Overview

I’m using MFMailComposeViewController to send emails from my app. Since updating to iPadOS 26.4, there is no way to cancel the mail composer because the “X” button in the top-left corner has disappeared. On iPhone with iOS 26.4, everything still seems to work as expected. Is this a known issue, or am I missing something? Has anyone else experienced this, or found a workaround?

I have an application that includes custom artwork for the album cover and text details setup with the MPRemoteCommandCenter.shared() reference. I need the user to have a full featured "now playing" display to see all of this. My experience is that cannot find a set of parameters for AVAudioSession.setCategory() that route audio successfully, and display the full featured now playing deck. If I use .playAndRecord, the audio I send out plays out on the radio. But, the now-playing deck is empty and nothing I do with the command center seems to change that. If I instead use .playback, I cannot use .defaultToSpeaker option which is the only way I've found to cause the "now-playing" navigation button to appear so that the full featured deck will display. But, of course setCategory() fails with an error about .defaultToSpeaker only available with .playAndRecord, so some default or intermediate state is entered and I see the full featured deck, but no audio goes out to the radio. What combination is supposed to be used here and is this more likely a problem with thread use (@MainActor) and/or some ordering of operations that I've overlooked?

I'm unclear on the implications of Apple's App Review Guideline 5.2.2: If your app uses, accesses, monetizes access to, or displays content from a third-party service, ensure that you are specifically permitted to do so under the service’s terms of use. Authorization must be provided upon request. If a paid subscription app uses a licensed search API to retrieve and display links to publicly available third-party web content, is the API license generally enough for compliance? Or does Apple expect separate authorization from each underlying website whose content appears in the search results?

I’m trying to complete my Apple Developer Program enrollment, and I’ve now been stuck in this process for about a month. The main issue is that the passport upload step in the Apple Developer app fails almost immediately every time with the same error, so I can’t complete identity verification and move forward. I’ve already gone through a very long back-and-forth with Apple Developer Support. At first, my enrollment through the website failed, and I was told to continue through the Apple Developer app instead. Then I ran into the passport upload issue in the app. Support asked me to upload identification documents through secure links, and I uploaded the requested documents, including my passport. I also updated my Apple Account name to match my official identification. During this process, one support representative, James, was helping me and there was a lot of back-and-forth. At one point it seemed like the case was being escalated and moving somewhere, but after that the responses became slower and then basically stopped. Since then I’ve been left waiting without a clear resolution, even though I’ve tried to follow every instruction carefully. This has become really frustrating and exhausting. I’m not trying to do anything unusual — I’m just trying to enroll in the Apple Developer Program so I can publish my app, and instead I’ve been stuck in a loop for weeks. Has anyone here had the passport upload fail immediately in the Apple Developer app, especially after already providing documents directly to Apple Support? Did anything help move the case forward? Thanks a lot.

We have an app with the default email entitlement that was granted several years ago. During our latest deployment, we received an error from our pipeline. When testing a manual submission in Xcode, we saw this error: Entitlement com.apple.developer.mail-client not found and could not be included in profile. This likely is not a valid entitlement and should be removed from your entitlements file. We checked the provisioning profile, and the default email entitlement is still present. It is visible on the certificate portal and also in the embedded.mobileprovision file. Can you suggest what we can do to release a new version of our app?

I’m working on an iOS Network Extension where a NEPacketTunnelProviderconfigures a local HTTP/HTTPS proxy usingNEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings.proxySettings. Per NEProxySettings.exceptionList docs: If the destination host name of an HTTP connection matches one of these patterns then the proxy settings will not be used for the connection. However, I’m seeing two distinct issues: Issue A (exception bypass not working): HTTPS traffic to a host that matches exceptionList still reaches the proxy. Issue B (domain-scoped proxy not applied): When matchDomains is set to match a specific domain (example: ["googlevideo.com"]), I still observe its traffic in some apps is not proxied. If I remove the domain from matchDomains, the same traffic is proxied. Environment OS: iOS (reproduced with 26.4 and other versions) Devices: Reproduced with several iPhones (likely iPads as well) Xcode: 26.3 Extension: NEPacketTunnelProvider Minimal Repro (code) This is the minimal configuration. Toggle between CONFIG A / CONFIG B to reproduce each issue. import NetworkExtension final class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { override func startTunnel( options: [String : NSObject]? = nil, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void ) { let proxyPort = 12345 // proxy listening port let settings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "8.8.8.8") let proxySettings = NEProxySettings() proxySettings.httpEnabled = true proxySettings.httpsEnabled = true proxySettings.httpServer = NEProxyServer(address: "1.2.3.4", port: proxyPort) // proxy listening address proxySettings.httpsServer = NEProxyServer(address: "1.2.3.4", port: proxyPort) // proxy listening address // CONFIG A: proxy all domains, but exclude some domains // proxySettings.matchDomains can be set to match all domains // proxySettings.exceptionList = ["*.cdninstagram.com", "cdninstagram.com"] // CONFIG B: proxy only a specific domain // proxySettings.matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"] settings.proxySettings = proxySettings setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) { error in completionHandler(error) } } } Repro steps Issue A (exceptionList bypass not working) Enable the VPN configuration and start the tunnel with CONFIG A (exceptionList = ["*.cdninstagram.com", "cdninstagram.com"]). Open the Instagram app to trigger HTTPS connections to *.cdninstagram.com Inspect proxy logs: cdninstagram.com traffic is still received by the proxy. Safari comparison: If I access URLs that trigger the same *.cdninstagram.com hosts from Safari, it can behave as expected. When the traffic is triggered from the Instagram app, the excluded host still reaches the proxy as CONNECT, which is unexpected. Issue B (matchDomains not applied for YouTube traffic) Start the tunnel with CONFIG B (matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"]). Open the YouTube app and start playing a video (traffic typically targets *.googlevideo.com). Inspect proxy logs: googlevideo.com traffic is not received by the proxy. Remove the host from matchDomains and observe that googlevideo.com traffic is received by the proxy. Safari comparison: If I access a googlevideo.com host from Safari while matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], it behaves as expected (proxied). In contrast, the YouTube app’s googlevideo.com traffic is not proxied unless I match all domains. Expected Issue A Connections to *.cdninstagram.com in the Instagram app should not use the proxy and should not reach the local proxy server. Issue B With matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], traffic to *.googlevideo.com (YouTube video traffic) should be proxied and therefore reach the local proxy. Actual Issue A The local proxy still receives the request as: CONNECT scontent-mad1-1.cdninstagram.com:443 HTTP/1.1 So the bypass does not happen. Issue B With matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], I still observe googlevideo.com traffic in the YouTube app that is not delivered to the proxy. When all traffic is proxied, the same traffic is delivered to the proxy.

Hi, I received this message recently, but after completing the process and uploading the KRS document for my company in Poland, it doesn’t seem to save. The same message keeps appearing again. I’ve tried around 50 times, but it just loops back to the same step. All agreements, tax forms, and compliance requirements are already active. I contacted the support but no reply. Anyone have any suggestion ?

Hi, I'm investigating whether 18MP photo capture from the front camera on iPhone 17 Pro is available to third-party apps using AVFoundation. I first inspected all available AVCaptureDevice formats, but I could not find any format corresponding to ~18MP resolution (e.g., around 4896×3672). for format in device.formats { let desc = format.formatDescription let dims = CMVideoFormatDescriptionGetDimensions(desc) print("Format: (dims.width) x (dims.height)") } All reported formats appear to be limited to resolutions such as 4032×3024 (12MP) or below. Question: Is 18MP front camera capture actually available to third-party apps via AVFoundation on iPhone 17?

Hi there, We're implementing Apple's DeviceCheck App Attest for production iOS authentication. The public documentation defines DCError cases but doesn't specify which errors are expected per API method or recommend retry/remediation strategies. We need Apple's guidance to implement robust, production-aligned error handling before rollout. 1. Error Surface per API Method Question: Can you confirm the complete, officially expected set of DCError values for each method? We understand the following errors are possible across App Attest APIs: invalidKey invalidInput featureUnsupported serverUnavailable unknownSystemFailure Specifically, please confirm which errors can occur for: DCAppAttestService.generateKey() DCAppAttestService.attestKey(_:clientData:) DCAppAttestService.generateAssertion(keyID:clientData:) Are there any additional undocumented or edge-case errors we should handle? 2. Retry Strategy & Remediation Matrix Question: For each API method and error code, please help us with proposal around which errorCode is retriable, whats the remediation pre retry, retry cap and backoff strategy: Kindly also help with errors that are not covered here: Specific sub-questions: invalidKey handling: When this error occurs: Should the app delete the key and call generateKey again? Or should it fail the entire flow? serverUnavailable handling: Should we retry immediately, or wait before retrying? Is exponential backoff recommended? What's the recommended max retry count? Backoff strategy: Which errors (if any) qualify for exponential backoff? Recommended base delay, max delay, and jitter approach? When should we give up and fail the request? unknownSystemFailure: Is this retriable or should we fail? Any known causes or mitigations? 3. Simulator Testing Questions: Simulator API behavior: Can App Attest APIs be called normally on iOS Simulator? If not, is there a way to simulate for testing. Do they complete successfully with simulated attestations, or do they fail? Thanks, Nirekshitha

I published the latest update of my AppKit app in September with macOS 26.0. I just wanted to create a new update, but compiling on macOS 26.4 now fails because of the symbol NSTextAttachment.character which is referenced in my code. The error is Type 'NSTextAttachment' has no member 'character' I've never experienced before that a symbol suddenly is not available anymore without even a deprecation notice from one OS release to the next, let alone a minor release. Is this a bug in macOS or Xcode, or should I start worrying about symbols becoming unavailable anytime?

I’m trying to submit the first release of my iOS app together with the app’s first consumable in-app purchases, and I’m stuck in what looks like an App Store Connect state issue. My app was already rejected by App Review because the in-app purchases did not appear inside the app when the reviewer opened the paywall. Current setup: First app release Current app version page: iOS App Version 1.0.2 Current attached build: 5 App has never been released before 4 consumable IAPs: com.glowup.credits.100 com.glowup.credits.500 com.glowup.credits.1000 com.glowup.credits.2500 What I see in App Store Connect: All 4 IAPs show Waiting for Review On the iOS App Version 1.0.2 page, the In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section does not appear at all Because of that, I cannot explicitly select or attach the IAPs from the version page What I’ve already done: Uploaded a new build and attached build 5 to version 1.0.2 Removed my local StoreKit configuration file so the app now uses live App Store / StoreKit only Confirmed RevenueCat is configured correctly and sees the offering/packages RevenueCat logs show the products exist remotely, but StoreKit cannot fetch any live products and returns an “offerings empty / none of the products could be fetched” type error RevenueCat also reports the products are still in WAITING_FOR_REVIEW My questions: If the IAPs already show Waiting for Review, are they automatically linked to the current app submission? Is it expected that the In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section can disappear from the app version page in this state? For a first-release app that was already rejected, is attaching a new build and clicking Update Review enough, or is there another step required to associate the IAPs with the resubmission? Has anyone seen App Review reject an app for missing IAPs while the IAPs were still pending review and not yet fetchable from StoreKit? Any guidance from someone who has dealt with this exact first-release + first-IAP submission flow would help a lot.

Development environment: Xcode 26.4, macOS 26.3.1 Run-time configuration: iOS 18.7.6 and higher We have an application running on supervised devices, with an MDM profile typically deployed via jamf. The profile enables a Content Filter, with the two flags "Socket Filter" and "Browser Filter" set to true. On the device side, we implement the content filter as a network extension via: a class FilterDataProvider extending NEFilterDataProvider, a class FilterControlProvider extending NEFilerControlProvider. For the record, the FilterDataProvider overrides the handle*() methods to allow all traffic; the handleNewFlow() simply reports the new connection to FilterControlProvider for analysis. Problem: some customers reported that after a reboot of their device, they would not get access to the internet for up to 60s/90s. We have not been able to reproduce the problem on our own devices. What we see is that, even with our app uninstalled, without any Content Filter, it takes roughly 20s to 25s for a device to have internet access, so we can probably consider this 20s delay as a baseline. But would you be aware of a reason that would explain the delay observed by these customers? More details: We have conducted some tests on our devices, with extended logging. In particular: we have added an internet probe in the app that is triggered when the app starts up: it will try to connect to apple.com every 2s and report success or failure, we also have a network monitor (nw_path_monitor_set_update_handler) that reacts to network stack status updates and logs the said status. A typical boot up sequence shows the following: the boot time is 7:59:05, the app starts up at 7:59:30 (manually launched when the device is ready), the probe fails and keeps failing, the content filter is initialized/started up 7:59:53 and is ready at 7:59:55, the network monitor shows that the network stack is connected (status = nw_path_status_satisfied) right after that, and the probe succeeds in connecting 2s later. In other words, internet is available about 50s after boot time, 25s after app startup (i.e. after the device is actually ready). For some customers, this 25s delay can go up to 60/90s.

We are a development team building an application targeted specifically for the Southeast Asian market. We have been caught in a frustrating review cycle and are hoping to get some guidance on how to move forward. The Situation Our application is intentionally unavailable in the United States. Per Apple's guidance, we implemented a "We are currently not available in your country" error screen that displays when a user's location falls outside our supported regions. This is intentional, expected behavior — not a bug. The Problem Despite providing detailed testing instructions and dedicated test accounts tied to the correct region, our Reviewers consistently: Do not use the test accounts we created for them Do not follow the regional setup instructions we provided Access the app from a US-based location See the geographic restriction screen (the one Apple instructed us to build) Flag it as a bug and reject the submission We have confirmed this is the root cause, as the rejection notes reference the exact screen that Apple previously instructed us to implement. The reviewer spends fewer than 10 seconds in the app before rejecting. What We Need We are stuck in a loop with no clear path out. We are asking for: Escalation to a reviewer who will follow the provided testing instructions and use the correct region/account Clarification on how to properly communicate geographic restrictions to the review team so this is not flagged as a defect We have put significant effort into complying with every piece of guidance we have received, and we are committed to meeting Apple's standards. We just need a reviewer to spend more than a few seconds with our app using the correct credentials. Any help escalating this or pointing us to the right process would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. App Name: Hustla App ID: 6756264790

I'm trying to sign my application but the build times out after 90 minutes waiting for notarytool to return. This seems to be getting worse and worse. I have now updated the timeout to 10hours, to see if I can get a response at all. Something is very wrong with the tool. This was working fine up until about the 28th March 2026.

Hello everyone, My app (ID: 6756186616) was submitted on Mar 15, 2026, and has been stuck in "Waiting for Review" status for over 17 days. I contacted Developer Support (case #20000111565861) and received confirmation that it's proceeding normally, but no update since. On average, Apple reviews 90 percent of apps within 24 hours. However, there might be cases that need more review time, but mine exceeds two week. Any recent experiences with long queues? Thanks!

Hello, I am requesting guidance regarding an unresolved Apple Developer Program renewal issue. My Individual membership expired on July 10, 2021. I previously submitted support requests, including Case #102854085591, but I still do not have a clear resolution as of April 1, 2026. Details: Team ID: C69P64A2ZN Membership type: Individual Expiration date: July 10, 2021 Previous case number: 102854085591 Could Apple please clarify: Whether this membership can still be renewed Whether any action is required from my side Whether I must re-enroll instead of renew Any guidance would be appreciated, as this has been blocking my development work for a long time. Thank you.

hi there, i installed the app and paid for developer program in 26 march 2026, today is 1st april 2026 but there's no acces and i cant see anything, there's no refund, i can't refund because it's apple's subscription, what is going on? support didn't answered my questions almost 3 days

Hello, I am seeking guidance regarding a Pending Termination Notice received on March 18, 2026 for the developer account of Kaagapay Platform Inc. Background: Our app, CreditKaagapay: Score & Report (App ID: 6744999391), is a credit report and loan matching platform operating in the Philippines in partnership with the Credit Information Corporation (CIC). The app maintained a 4.8-star rating with over 4,000 reviews. No prior warnings were issued before the notice. Notice Details: The notice cited Guideline 5.6 and Section 3.2(f), alleging dishonest or fraudulent activity related to account information. Timeline: • March 18: Received the Pending Termination Notice. Submitted two appeals (App Removal + Pending Account Termination) on the same day. Both received on-screen confirmation. • March 25: Submitted a follow-up through the App Review Status contact form. • March 26: Developer Support confirmed the appeal was forwarded to the App Review Board (Case ID: 30000003321343). • April 1 (today, Day 14): No response received from the App Review Board. Questions: Is there a way to confirm that our appeals are currently under review by the App Review Board? Are there any additional steps we should take to bring this to the Board's attention? Is there any mechanism to submit supplementary documentation, as the appeal form did not support attachments? We remain fully committed to compliance and ready to provide any additional information requested. Thank you for any guidance. Yifu Zhang, Account Holder Case ID: 30000003321343

I am working on a large-scale e-commerce application and we are trying to solve a specific issue regarding push notifications and user experience. We have a use case where we need to send a standard push notification to the user, but under certain local conditions on the device, we want to intercept that notification via a Notification Service Extension and suppress/drop it so it does not alert the user. We understand that the com.apple.developer.usernotifications.filtering entitlement allows a Notification Service Extension to drop notifications. However, looking at the entitlement request form, the categories seem strictly limited to: End-to-end encrypted messaging Earthquake warnings Education/learning platforms Enterprise healthcare apps My questions for the community and Apple staff: Is it possible for an e-commerce or retail app to be approved for this entitlement if we have a highly specific, valid use case that improves user experience. If this entitlement is strictly off-limits for our domain, what is the Apple-recommended architecture to achieve this? Thank you in advance for any insights or guidance!

Hello team, I have implemented sample project for URL Filtering as well as setup PIR server at backend but currently I am facing a major issue, If PIR server is re started then the app shows error code 9 every time until. and unless I disconnect and connect it back to internet