Overview

My team has a robust digital accessibility program and processes for WCAG conformance in our apps. Because of this, there are definitely accessibility defects that get caught and addressed in order of impact and business priority like any other bug. Obviously we want to aim for 100% accessibility for our users, but it's a continual work in progress as new enhancements or changes are released. I'm stuck on the appropriate measurement to indicate support. If we have 50 common tasks and the most central 10 tasks are solid but some supporting (but also common) tasks have a contrast fail or accessibleLabel missing, does that make the whole app not supporting the feature? If "completing the task" is the rubric there are a whole range of interpretations for that. In a complex app, I anticipate that a group like ours will have strong support for many of the Accessibility Nutrition Labels accessibility features across tasks and devices, but realistically never be 100% free of defects for a given Apple Accessibility feature, even among core tasks. As I consider the next steps for Nutrition Labels, I do not see anything in the documentation that gives a sort of baseline or measurement for inclusion. We plan to test all steps to complete a task, and log defects accordingly with an assigned timeline for fixing them (as would be true for functional defects).

Hello, I am working to integrate the new com.apple.developer.networking.carrier-constrained.app-optimized entitlement in my iOS 26 app so that my app can use a carrier-provided satellite network, and want to confirm my understanding of how to detect and optimize for satellite network conditions. (Ref: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entitlements/com.apple.developer.networking.carrier-constrained.app-optimized ) My current approach: I plan to set the entitlement to true once my app is optimized for satellite networks. To detect if the device is connected to a satellite network, I intend to use the Network framework’s NWPath properties: isUltraConstrained — I understand this should be set to true when the device is connected to a satellite network. (Ref: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/network/nwpath/isultraconstrained ) linkQuality == .minimal — I believe this will also be set in satellite scenarios, though it may not be exclusive to satellite connections. (Ref: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/network/nwpath/linkquality-swift.enum/minimal ) Questions: Is it correct that isUltraConstrained will reliably indicate a satellite connection? Should I also check for linkQuality == .minimal, or is isUltraConstrained sufficient? Are there any additional APIs or best practices for detecting and optimizing for satellite connectivity that I should be aware of? Thank you for confirming whether my understanding and approach are correct, and for any additional guidance.

"Use location, address and addressRepresentations instead" Is it possible to know what kind of "Address" a MapItem is representing (State, County, Neighborhood etc) after a MKGeocodingRequest? Is it possible to find out the CLRegion or similar of an map item. (Now when we cannot read it from the Placemark)

Hi everyone, We just received another App Store rejection under Guideline 3.1.3 - Business - Payments - Other Purchase Methods, stating that we are using in-app purchases to sell physical goods — specifically, a physical QR code sent to the user. However, in our latest build, this issue was already addressed: All physical QR code purchases are now handled entirely through Stripe Checkout, outside of the app. No consumable IAPs are used for physical goods. The purchase flow is completely optional - users can tap “Continue” to skip it and still use the app without ever engaging with Stripe or purchasing anything physical. We’re a small team trying to launch and are stuck in a loop where it seems like the rejection feedback might not reflect the latest build with not clear feedback from Apple. Has anyone experienced something similar? Would really appreciate any guidance or insight — or if anyone from Apple is here, we’re happy to jump on a call to clarify. Thanks in advance!

Dear Apple Support, I am writing to report a payment issue with my App Store Connect developer account. The latest payment is marked as "Paid" in the Payments and Financial Reports section, but as of today, more than 3 business days have passed and the funds have not yet arrived in my bank account. I have double-checked that my banking information is accurate and up to date. I would appreciate it if you could investigate this issue and provide further clarification on the current status of the payment. Thank you in advance for your support.

I've been able to submit my app without issue so far until today, but it looks like app icon requirements either changed or being enforced differently? Validation failed Missing required icon file. The bundle does not contain an app icon for iPhone / iPod Touch of exactly '120x120' pixels, in .png format for iOS versions >= 10.0. To support older versions of iOS, the icon may be required in the bundle outside of an asset catalog. Make sure the Info.plist file includes appropriate entries referencing the file. See https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/information_property_list/user_interface. (ID: 954a36b1-b212-4d7f-8a12-db2d6abe83e2) Validation failed Missing required icon file. The bundle does not contain an app icon for iPad of exactly '152x152' pixels, in .png format for iOS versions >= 10.0. To support older operating systems, the icon may be required in the bundle outside of an asset catalog. Make sure the Info.plist file includes appropriate entries referencing the file. See https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/information_property_list/user_interface. (ID: 7ded4fb3-a0f0-4542-9373-a3dcf9ace3ef) Validation failed Missing app icon. Include a large app icon as a 1024 by 1024 pixel PNG for the 'Any Appearance' image well in the asset catalog of apps built for iOS or iPadOS. Without this icon, apps can't be submitted for review. For details, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/configuring-your-app-icon. (ID: 43a6785a-3917-4ac9-90b1-dc85d5b2fdd8) Contents.json I already have a 1024x1024 PNG for 'Any Apperance' so not sure what that one is about. The others I cannot find slots for, to provide a generic icon even though they wont be used since my app is only for iOS18+ I attempted adding a new icon set "App Icon" with the 120x120 PNG but that did not seem to work so I removed it. Any suggestions? *note I am also using the .Icon file created by Icon Composer (v3)

I have sent in a feedback report (FB18222398) but I have no idea if anyone has looked at it. I know from past experiences that Apple devs do look at these forums. This applies to each of the betas, 1, 2 and 3. I have created a new Personal Voice with each beta. I create a personal voice in English. When it's done processing, I tap Preview and it says in English what is expected. But after some time, an hour or a day, the language of the voice file changes languages and no longer works properly. If I press Preview it is no longer intelligible. I have a text to speech app and initially the created voice works but then when the language of the file changes, it no longer works. I have run an app on my iphone through Xcode that prints to the console the voices installed on the device with the language. Currently this is the voice file: Voice Identifier: com.apple.speech.personalvoice.AAA9C6F2-9125-475F-BA2F-22C63274991D Language: es-MX and on a second device the same personal voice is in a different language: Voice Identifier: com.apple.speech.personalvoice.AAA9C6F2-9125-475F-BA2F-22C63274991D Language: zh-CN Although, a previous personal voice file that listed as Spanish-Mexican played in English with a Spanish accent or when playing Spanish text, it sounded almost perfect. This current personal voice doesn't do that, and is unintelligible. Previous attempts have converted to Chinese. I hope someone can look into this.

We have a Java application built for macOS. On the first launch, the application prompts the user to allow local network access. We've correctly added the NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription key to the Info.plist, and the provided description appears in the system prompt. After the user grants permission, the application can successfully connect to a local server using its hostname. However, the issue arises after the system is rebooted. When the application is launched again, macOS does not prompt for local network access a second time—which is expected, as the permission was already granted. Despite this, the application is unable to connect to the local server. It appears the previously granted permission is being ignored after a reboot. A temporary workaround is to manually toggle the Local Network permission off and back on via System Settings > Privacy & Security, which restores connectivity—until the next reboot. This behavior is highly disruptive, both for us and for a significant number of our users. We can reproduce this on multiple systems... The issues started from macOS Sequoia 15.0 By opening the application bundle using "Show Package Contents," we can launch the application via "JavaAppLauncher" without any issues. Once started, the application is able to connect to our server over the local network. This seems to bypass the granted permissions? "JavaAppLauncher" is also been used in our Info.plist file

I work on a universal app that targets both iPhone and iPad. Our iPad app currently requires full screen. When testing on the latest iPadOS 26 beta, we see the following warning printed to the console: Update the Info.plist: 1) `UIRequiresFullScreen` will soon be ignored. 2) Support for all orientations will soon be required. It will take a fair amount of effort to update our app to properly support presentation in a resizable window. We wanted to gauge how urgent this change is. Our testing has shown that iPadOS 26 supports our app in a non-resizable window. Can someone from Apple provide any guidance as to how soon “soon” is? Will UIRequiresFullScreen be ignored in iPadOS 26? Will support for all orientations be required in iPadOS 26?

Hello everyone, I'm a developer who has been facing a significant issue with my Apple Developer account and the app submission process. I hope to get some guidance or assistance from the community or Apple support. Timeline of Events Four months ago: I prepared an app and submitted it to TestFlight for review. Initial rejection: The app was rejected due to technical issues such as screenshots, app description, and insufficient permission explanations for features like location, camera, and microphone. Resubmission after fixes: I carefully addressed all the issues mentioned by the Apple review team and resubmitted the app. Second rejection: This time, the app was rejected citing general policy violations related to copyright issues. The rejection was vague, and I couldn’t understand the exact problem. Further attempts: To resolve the issue, I removed all video, photo, and media content from the app and resubmitted it. However, it was still rejected for the same reason. I went through this process about 7-8 times, each time getting rejected without clarity on the root cause. Account deletion notice: Eventually, I received an email stating that my account was set to be deleted in 30 days. This was alarming because I had been diligently trying to comply with Apple’s policies for months. Deleting the app: To prevent any harm to my account, I decided to delete the app from my account within the 30-day period, effectively abandoning the project. Account still deleted: Despite deleting the app, my account was still deleted after 30 days. Discovery of similar app name: Later, I noticed that there was another app on the App Store with a name very similar to mine. For example, my app was named "ABcdefgh," and the existing app was "AB.cdefgh," with the only difference being the "." I believe this name similarity might have been the cause of the copyright issue, but it was too late as my account had already been deleted. Contact with Apple Turkey: I reached out to Apple Turkey, and they were very attentive, spending about 40 minutes trying to help me. However, they ultimately informed me that they couldn’t intervene and that the issue could only be resolved through Apple America. Attempts to contact Apple America: I tried filling out forms multiple times to contact Apple, but since I had deleted the app, I couldn’t see the responses from the team. Impact of the Issue This situation has been very distressing as I’ve lost my developer account and the ability to publish apps. My users are constantly inquiring about the iOS versions of my apps, and I’m unable to provide them due to this issue. Request for Assistance I’m seeking advice on how to resolve this issue. Specifically: Has anyone else experienced a similar issue with app name similarity leading to account deletion? Are there any specific steps I can take to appeal the account deletion? Is there a direct way to contact Apple America for developer account issues? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for taking the time to read my post. I appreciate any help or suggestions you can provide. Best regards.

Hello! I am experiencing some strange bugs around DeviceActivityEvents: When creating a DeviceActivityEvent we can assign a threshold and applicationTokens. The idea is, that after the user has spent said threshold on said apps, eventDidReachThreshold is called. includesPastActivity is set to false. On iOS 26 however, it happens (quite reliably after updating to a new beta seed) quite often that eventDidReachThreshold is called immediately (after a couple of seconds) instead of waiting for the threshold to be met. Is anyone else seeing similar issues on iOS 26? Only workaround I have found is to ask users to re-grant Screen Time permissions. This only holds for about two weeks though or at most until the next iOS 26 beta update is installed. Feedback filed under: FB18061981 FB18927456

I am using the MatterSupport extension to commission devices for my own ecosystem. I use the extension to do the initial connection to the device (BLE, PASE, bring device onto wifi/thread) and then use the method commissionDevice(in home: MatterAddDeviceRequest.Home?, onboardingPayload: String, commissioningID: UUID) in MatterAddDeviceExtensionRequestHandler to send a request to my own hub on the local network where it then connects to the device via wifi/thread and fully commissions the device. This flow is working correctly for wifi enabled devices, however it fails for thread devices. For some context, I am using my own border router (and have already added the router's credentials to the phone using THClient's storeCredentials). Here are some device-specific results: ESP32 (WIFI): successful commission ESP32 (THREAD): failure Matter Certified ONVIS smart plug (THREAD): failure The ESP32's are running espressif matter examples. Example border router is a running OTBR docker container I believe that the entire PASE session is established and the device gets onto the thread network, but the process seems to stall after that. I have verified that selectThreadNetwork(...) and validateDeviceCredential(...) get called but the commissioning process seems to stall before it can get to commissionDevice(...) I am limited to 7k characters, but I'll try to include as many relevant log lines as I can near the error if anyone has any ideas. I've already created a bug report with ID: FB18985348 which includes the full logs from the esp32 and a sysdiagnose from an iPhone 12 Pro (iOS 18.5) using the following log profiles: Home app/HomeKit HomeThread ThreadNetwork When commissioning directly from my hub, the entire commissioning completes successfully 100% of the time. This failure only happens when I use MatterSupport to initiate commissioning for Matter over Thread devices specifically. Very condensed homed log overview for uncertified ESP32 thread example Next: 'SecurePairing' -> 'ReadCommissioningInfo' Step: 'ReadCommissioningInfo' Sending read requests for commissioning information NetworkCommissioning Features: has Thread. endpointid = 0 <MTRDeviceController_Concrete: ..., uuid: F9BB9F53-BF73-4B82-B00B-045E7709530E...> completed for nodeID 0x0000000055d193ec with status: Success ✔ 'ReadCommissioningInfo' Next: 'ReadCommissioningInfo' -> 'ArmFailSafe' Step: 'ArmFailSafe' ✔ 'ArmFailSafe' Next: 'ArmFailSafe' -> 'ConfigRegulatory' Step: 'ConfigRegulatory' ✔ 'ConfigRegulatory' Next: 'ConfigRegulatory' -> 'ConfigureTCAcknowledgments' Step: 'ConfigureTCAcknowledgments' ✔ 'ConfigureTCAcknowledgments' Next: 'ConfigureTCAcknowledgments' -> 'SendPAICertificateRequest' Step: 'SendPAICertificateRequest' ✔ 'SendPAICertificateRequest' Next: 'SendPAICertificateRequest' -> 'SendDACCertificateRequest' Step: 'SendDACCertificateRequest' ✔ 'SendDACCertificateRequest' Next: 'SendDACCertificateRequest' -> 'SendAttestationRequest' Step: 'SendAttestationRequest' ✔ 'SendAttestationRequest' Next: 'SendAttestationRequest' -> 'AttestationVerification' Step: 'AttestationVerification' Error on commissioning step 'AttestationVerification': Internal error Next: 'AttestationVerification' -> 'AttestationRevocationCheck' Step: 'AttestationRevocationCheck' (with error) Device attestation error: Integrity check failed. Continue commissioning (ignore attestation failure: YES) ✔ 'AttestationRevocationCheck' Next: 'AttestationRevocationCheck' -> 'SendOpCertSigningRequest' Step: 'SendOpCertSigningRequest' ✔ 'SendOpCertSigningRequest' Next: 'SendOpCertSigningRequest' -> 'ValidateCSR' Step: 'ValidateCSR' ✔ 'ValidateCSR' Next: 'ValidateCSR' -> 'GenerateNOCChain' Step: 'GenerateNOCChain' ✔ 'GenerateNOCChain' Step: 'SendTrustedRootCert' ✔ 'SendTrustedRootCert' Next: 'SendTrustedRootCert' -> 'SendNOC' Step: 'SendNOC' ✔ 'SendNOC' Next: 'SendNOC' -> 'ThreadNetworkSetup' Step: 'ThreadNetworkSetup' ✔ 'ThreadNetworkSetup' Next: 'ThreadNetworkSetup' -> 'FailsafeBeforeThreadEnable' Step: 'FailsafeBeforeThreadEnable' ✔ 'FailsafeBeforeThreadEnable' Next: 'FailsafeBeforeThreadEnable' -> 'ThreadNetworkEnable' Step: 'ThreadNetworkEnable' ✔ 'ThreadNetworkEnable' Next: 'ThreadNetworkEnable' -> 'kEvictPreviousCaseSessions' Step: 'kEvictPreviousCaseSessions' ✔ 'kEvictPreviousCaseSessions' Next: 'kEvictPreviousCaseSessions' -> 'kFindOperationalForStayActive' Step: 'kFindOperationalForStayActive' Error: Timeout Next: 'kFindOperationalForStayActive' -> 'Cleanup' Step: 'Cleanup' (with timeout error) ✔ 'Cleanup' Commissioning complete for node ID 0x0000000055D193EC with timeout error

I’m facing an issue with my macOS app after code signing and notarization. The app is signed with my Developer ID and notarized using xcrun notarytool. Everything works fine on the machine where the signing was done — Gatekeeper accepts it, no warning appears, and codesign/spctl checks pass. However, when running the same .app on other Macs, users receive a Gatekeeper warning saying the app is "malicious software and cannot be opened". The signature is valid and the notarization log shows status: Accepted. What I've tried: Verified signature with codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=2 Checked notarization status via xcrun notarytool log Assessed Gatekeeper trust with spctl --assess --type execute Everything passes successfully on the development machine. Why would the app be treated as malicious on other systems even after notarization? I'm happy to share logs and technical details if needed.

When creating an icon using icon composer, I cant upload a build to testflight/App Store connect. Running on device from Xcode works fine, but as soon as I archive and upload to App Store Connect, I get an error saying the icon contains an alpha channel

The documentation for CLGeocoder states Geocoding requests are rate-limited for each app, so making too many requests in a short period of time may cause some of the requests to fail. (When the maximum rate is exceeded, the geocoder returns an error object with the CLError.Code.network error to the associated completion handler.) And it provides helpful guidance on how and when to submit geocoding requests. The documentation for MKReverseGeocodingRequest does not mention requests are rate-limited. Does this mean it is not rate-limited? If it is rate-limited, is it similar to CLGeocoder, what is its behavior? It is important to understand behavior of the API in order to understand impact on my app’s use case and how users will be affected should I change the implementation. Thanks!

Using SwiftUI on macOS, how can I add a toolbar item on the right-most (trailing) edge of the window's toolbar when an Inspector is used? At the moment, the toolbar items are all left-of (leading) the split view tracking separator. I want the inspector toolbar item to be placed similar to where Xcode's Inspector toolbar item is placed: always as far right (trailing) as possible. NavigationSplitView { // ... snip } detail: { // ... snip } .inspector(isPresented: $isInspectorPresented) { InspectorContentView() } .toolbar { // What is the correct placement value here? ToolbarItem(placement: .primaryAction) { Button { isInspectorPresented.toggle() } label: { Label("Toggle Inspector", systemImage: "sidebar.trailing") } } } See the attached screenshot. When the InspectorView is toggled open, the toolbar item tracks leading the split view tracking separator, which is not consistent with how Xcode works.

My app is currently using CLGeocoder to get a CLPlacemark, then using placemark.postalAddress with CNPostalAddressFormatter to get an attributed string for the full address, I then enumerate its attributes to pull out specific elements like just the street or state or zip etc. This is deprecated in iOS 26 with MKReverseGeocodingRequest being the intended replacement. This API returns an MKMapItem which doesn’t provide a CNPostalAddress - you can get a full address as a String but not structured address data that I’m seeing. Am I missing some way to get the postal address? Or is it a non-goal to provide that anymore? Thanks!

Apologies if this is not the correct topic to post under. EpochField 5.2 is our application. It's a .NET MAUI application built against XCode 16. A customer of ours uses another app, TN3270, to connect to a mainframe host. After installing our app on an iPad and restarting the device, the TN3270 app will disconnect when suspended. Uninstalling our app (EpochField) will allow the TN3270 to suspend without disconnecting. We have tried removing background services, setting UIRequiresFullScreen to false or removing it entirely, and several other ideas. The only remedy seems to be uninstalling EpochField. On an iPad device: Install MochaSoft’s TN3270 app (free version is fine). Create a connection to ssl3270.nccourts.org, port 2023, SSL/TLS turned on, keep alive turned on. Verify that you can connect. Suspend the app by swiping up or choosing another app. Go back to TN3270 and verify that the app has not disconnected. Install EpochField 5.2. Do not run or configure the app, just install it. Repeat step 2. Restart the device. Open EpochField 5.2. You do not need to configure the app or login. Sometimes it isn't necessary to ever open EpochField to get the disconnects, but this is the most reliable way to reproduce the situation. Repeat step 2. The TN3270 app will now disconnect when suspended, even if EpochField is closed. You may need to wait a few seconds after suspending. Uninstall EpochField 5.2. Repeat step 2: the TN3270 app will now remain connected when suspended.

I’m implementing StoreKit External Purchase Custom Links (EU) and so far it is really painful. I am running into a strange, device-specific issue. On 3/4 devices it works. On one device I never get a token at launch nor before a transaction. isEligible is true everywhere. All devices have versions 18.5 and are located in Germany. Info.plist: SKExternalPurchaseCustomLinkRegions is set to EU storefront codes and I have followed every step in the documentation: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/externalpurchasecustomlink Good device: At launch → ACQUISITION = nil, SERVICES = token present. Works consistently. Faulty device: At launch → ACQUISITION = nil, SERVICES = nil. Same before transaction. No token ever reaches my server from this device. isEligible is true on both devices. Any experts or help on the matter?

When setting new entitlements com.apple.developer.networking.carrier-constrained.appcategory and com.apple.developer.networking.carrier-constrained.app-optimized, I have a question about how URLSession should behave. I notice we have a way to specify whether a Network connection should allow ultra-constrained paths via NWParameters allowUltraConstrainedPaths: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/network/nwparameters/allowultraconstrainedpaths There does not appear to be a similar property on URLSessionConfiguration. In an ultra-constrained (eg. satellite) network, should we expect all requests made through an URLSession to fail? Does all network activity when ultra-constrained need to go through a NWConnection or NetworkConnection specifically configured with allowUltraConstrainedPaths, or can URLSession ever be configured to allow ultra-constrained paths?