Overview

iOS 15 - iOS 26.x, SwiftUI, Xcode 26.1.1 (rewritten without links) I’m attempting to add the capability to export a file from CoreData. Since ShareLink requires iOS16+, I found an article showing how to create a UIKit wrapper for 'UIActivityViewController' This does work, but I end up with multiple files instead of one. How do I merge this into one file? Note: I don’t think I want to write to the app’s document directory – rather I’d like to allow the user to export to iCloud. Eventually, I’d like to share a list of dates with descriptions and if someone puts a sensitive date in there – I don’t want it to be left in a directory. I would include a warning that the file that they export needs to be handled with care if there are any sensitive dates. Some might consider birthdays as private information, right? I'd also like to be able to name the file - so far when the share sheet comes up, I select "Save to Files" and it uses a default name of text.txt My next step is to be able to import a CSV file (roundtrip) - could you point me to resources for how to do that?

Hello, Does app review depend on app reviewers availability? And holidays etc? IS there a maximum number of days that an app has to be reviewed before end of that period? In other words: if an app is posted, a review HAS TO HAPPEN before x days, is a rule (hopefully) or no? Once an an app has been reviewed once, and you send a new build (that addresses the fixes) for example you add the "sign in with Apple" if you forgot to add it next to "sign in with another method", does the second round of review have to be done by the SAME REVIEWER first time or can it be done by a second reviewer? I have posted and have been waiting since 5 days now (since 5 march) Are we allowed to post many apps at once? I mean as a developer I can take time working in multiple apps, then suddenly deciding to publish them all, that is okay right? Are their limitation or expected "published flow" to have? Once an app has been approved and published, will the waiting times for updates (new versions of the app) reviews smaller hopefully? or how was your experience? Is there a general rule you have seen? Thank you

Issue: after going through configuration steps for app clips, when I scan my QR code, my app clip does not appear, instead safari attempts to open the url as a web page. note: my aasa endpoint is never even getting called when scanning the QR code. Setup: App uninstalled in accordance with Apple Documentation "Users don’t install App Clips, and App Clips don’t appear on the Home Screen. Similarly, testers don’t install the beta version of your App Clip" testflight installed in accordance with Apple Documentation My app's Build 1.51.9 (1) uploaded and greenlit in testflight. My apple email is added as an internal tester is the same as my Apple ID for the device used. I have provided an aasa for the path: .well-known/apple-app-site-association. Here is my full url: https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/.well-known/apple-app-site-association. { "appclips": { "apps": [ "8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1.Clip" ] }, "applinks": { "details": [ { "components": [ { "/": "/appClips/referral/venueToUser" } ], "appIDs": [ "8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1" ] } ] } } Here are my entitlements for my parent target: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>aps-environment</key> <string>development</string> <key>com.apple.developer.applesignin</key> <array> <string>Default</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.associated-domains</key> <array> <string>applinks:akin-server-side.onrender.com</string> <string>applinks:akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com</string> <string>appclips:akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com</string> <string>appclips:akin-server-side.onrender.com</string> </array> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1</string> </array> </dict> </plist> Here are the entitlements for my app clip target: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>com.apple.developer.associated-domains</key> <array> <string>applinks:akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com</string> <string>applinks:akin-server-side.onrender.com</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.parent-application-identifiers</key> <array> <string>$(AppIdentifierPrefix)com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1</string> </array> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1</string> </array> </dict> </plist> On App Store Connect in the Testflight section for this project and build: Build 1.51.9 (1), Test Information -> App Clip Invocations I have the following: copy pasted for convenience: "no variables":"https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/appClips/referral/venueToUser", "Jeff referral":"https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/appClips/referral/venueToUser?venueID=ChIJVaPxJnCej4ARyxiB9Tt2tG8&referrerName=Jeff" Here is the QR code I attempted to scan, https://akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com/appClips/referral/venueToUser?venueID=ChIJVaPxJnCej4ARyxiB9Tt2tG8&referrerName=Jeff

By analysis the log, seems the following 3 calls has been ended by system callkit (Not mainly trigger the end call): @apple Do you have similar report that the iOS CallKit End the call withtour user action? Device info: iPhone18,1（iPhone 16 Pro） iOS 26.2 RCAppMobile/25.4.30.995 CTRadioAccessTechnologyNR（5G NR）

Hello, I am facing a critical issue where the Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement is not being applied to my app extensions, despite the main app ID being approved. Main App ID: com.hayashikento.focuspact (Approved on March 13) Extension ID 1: com.hayashikento.focuspact.ShieldActionExtension (Pending/Not visible) Extension ID 2: com.hayashikento.focuspact.ShieldConfigurationExtension (Pending/Not visible) I have submitted requests multiple times, but the entitlement does not appear in the "Capability Requests" for these extensions in the Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles portal. Furthermore, I am unable to contact Developer Support because the "Contact Us" form on the developer website consistently shows a "Request error" or freezes on the submission page. Since I am completely blocked from TestFlight distribution, could someone from Apple please look into my account (Team ID: UHG4J7F7NH) and manually sync these entitlements? Thank you for your help.

We have implemented offline Fairplay playback and it works fine.But at times when trying to playback the offline downloaded content, we get the following error"An unknown error occured (-42650)"Tried looking up the error in the documentation but couldnt find anything relevant.What could possibly be creating this error?

Does the App Review process have access to Apple-Hosted Asset Packs during review? My app uses Asset Packs to offer a library of data to the end-user (with a workaround, if unavailable), but I am frequently seeing the workaround screen in App Review with errors I haven't seen elsewhere. The latest error I encountered (via the App Review team's feedback) was: "A server with the specified hostname could not be found." thrown from (to my belief) AssetPackManager.shared.ensureLocalAvailability. This is unexpected to me, as both this code as well as the asset packs have already been released and are working reliably in production. Has anyone else experienced these issues?

Really, for how long will apps continue to get stuck in the 'review queue'? This is demoralizing and bad for organizations and developers behind these projects. Our app has been stuck in the 'waiting for review' zone for over 3 weeks+ now, and despite several emails, nothing has been done. No feedback whatsoever. Are we going to get a reply? Is this just an Apple thing, like work culture?

I use spm manage swift package, now i want my macos app support arm64e,so i add arm64e in Build Srtting -> Architectures. but i got error Could not find module 'SwiftyJSON' for target 'arm64e-apple-macos'; found: arm64-apple-macos, x86_64-apple-macos Apparently, if no limit in Package.swift, SPM will only compile versions for x86 and ARM64 architectures by default. now, how should I configure SPM to compile the arm64e version? thanks

Hi, I submitted a Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement request on March 9, 2026 for my iOS app, but I still have not received any approval, rejection, or other status update. At this point, I’m mainly trying to understand: whether this waiting time is currently normal, whether there is any way to check if the request is actually under review, and whether Apple provides any follow-up if more information is needed. This is blocking my progress, because the app depends on the Screen Time / Family Controls APIs. Has anyone recently experienced similar delays, and is there any recommended next step besides waiting? Thanks. Imi

‌Using Xcode 26, the built package encounters device compatibility issues — while it installs successfully on supported iPhone devices, but it crashes immediately upon launch and cannot run normally.‌‌In previous versions of Xcode, the same "minimum deployment" setting in the project did not cause such compatibility issues.‌ The app built with Xcode 26 shows the following behavior when installed and tested on various devices:‌ iPhone6p iOS12.5.8 fails to run 2.iPhone6 iOS11 fails to run 3.Iphone6 iOS12.5.7 fails to run 4.iPhone7 iOS12.1.3 ok 5.iPhoneX iOS 12.2 ok 6.iphone6s plus iOS10.3.1 ok 7.iphoneXS. iOS 12.1.4 ok 8.iPhone11 iOS 13.6.1 ok 9.iPhone7. iOS 13.7 ok We have tested and found that an iPhone 6s Plus running iOS 10.3.1 can normally run the app. We would like to know whether apps built with Xcode 26 are inherently incompatible with iPhone 6 and older devices. Has Xcode 26’s underlying build environment removed full support for the A8 chip, resulting in binary files containing instructions or memory models that older devices cannot parse? ‌Looking forward to your reply‌.

Hello My app got rejected with the message "We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences." In short, my app is a vpn app built entirely by me. In Russia almost all vpn protocols are blocked: wireguard, openvpn etc. And the only protocol they could not block was vless. It was hard to implement it, i spent like 3 weeks on it writing my own package on flutter. The app first was uploaded to android and shared through testflight with some of my friends. And everyone switched to my app, because it works perfect for their needs: accessing instagram, twitter etc. Those apps are blocked here. So on my first attempt publishing i got 2 errors: Vpn should be published on the account that is organization Spam rejection I registered a company and switched from individual account to a company. I also changed the ui of the app (although i agree most vpns share the same concept design). I got rejected again with only "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam". I appealed with a question why was it it rejected, explaining that the app was built by me, and of course, i use some libraries. I got the same roboting response. After that i added some features: Built in private browser Network connection speed Today submitted the new version hoping it would pass, but yet again got "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam". I'm really frustrated, because i spent 3 months developing the app. I understand there are dozens of vpns. But vpn is not exactly the simple feature app. Some are bad, some are good, and some doesn't work at all. My app doesn't have any ads and paid subscriptions. I also renamed my app to "Incognito - Browser, VPN". But can't get pass. Would like to get some advices. Please help P.S. Sorry for my bad grammar

I am trying to migrate an app to use Network framework for p2p connection. I came across this great article for migrating to Network framework however this doesnt use the new structured concurrency. This being introduced with iOS 26, there doesnt seem to be any sample code available on how to use the new classes. I am particularly interested in code samples showing how to add TLS with PSK encryption support and handling of switching between Wifi and peer to peer interface with the new structured concurrency supported classes. Are there any good resources I can refer on this other than the WWDC video?

Dear Apple App Review Team, I am writing to formally escalate a situation that has become completely unacceptable. My application has been under review since February 4th at 20:21 — over one month ago — with no resolution and no meaningful communication from your team. I paid $99/year for an Apple Developer subscription specifically to publish and operate my application on the App Store. This is not a free service. I have paid for the right to distribute my app, and Apple is currently preventing me from doing so — for over 30 days — without any justification or timeline. This means I am paying for a service I am not receiving. That is, by any definition, a breach of the agreement between Apple and its developers. For reference, the application details are as follows: App Name: Daddy Tales App ID: 6758725133 I expect this matter to be treated with the urgency it deserves and to be taken care of immediately. I have already waited far too long. Sincerely

I’m working on a product that includes TLS inspection capability. TLS inspection using a local MitM requires installing a trusted root certificate which is then used to create masquerade certificates to intercept and forward TLS traffic through the proxy. For manual installation the end user is required to authenticate as an administrator to modify the trust settings on our internal CA’s root certificate. My question concerns the options for enterprise deployment using an MDM. We want the generated root certificate to be unique to each endpoint so that if a private key is compromised it can’t be used to intercept traffic anywhere else. We can install a “certificate trust” configuration profile from the MDM but this requires a base64 encoded string of the root certificate. In effect the MDM needs to obtain the certificate from the endpoint and then send it back in the form of a configuration profile. I’m not aware that MDMs like Jamf can be configured to do this directly so we’re looking for any other mechanism to have macOS trust a locally generated certificate via MDM based on some non endpoint-unique criteria? One option might be to use an external CA with a trusted certificate to sign an intermediate endpoint certificate but this creates a significant risk if the external trusted certificate were ever compromised. Is this a common industry practice? So my question remains is there a better way to trust our per endpoint root certificate via MDM without needing to install a unique per endpoint configuration profile?

Hello, Is it possible for a Network Extension (running in its sandbox) to act as a client for an XPC service hosted by a Launch Daemon (e.g., to offload data processing)? Are there any specific sandbox restrictions or entitlement requirements for this type of XPC communication? Thank you in advance!

Hello, I am experiencing the same severe delays as many other developers on the forum recently. I have multiple apps ( 6759218500 and 6758253704)that have been completely stuck in the "Waiting for Review" status, with one sitting there since mid-February. I have already tried reaching out via the "Contact Us" form multiple times, but my open support case (Case ID: 102828235824) has received no follow-up or resolution. Could someone from the app review team please look into this, any assistance would be greatly appreciated, as the standard support channels seem to be unresponsive. Thank you.

I've read several topics on cancelling subscriptions in sandbox environment, but it seems to me that it could not be applied to TestFlight. I can cancel sandbox subscriptions through Settings > App Store > Sandbox account But since TestFlight does not use sandbox account I cannot cancel a sub from there. Also, TF purchase does not appear in the list of regular subscriptions (Settings > Profile > Media & Purchases). So my question is: is there any way to manually cancel auto-renewable subscription bought in TestFlight build of the app?

Hi Apple Developer Forums, I am experiencing a repeated issue with auto-renewable subscriptions during App Review for my iOS app. The app uses RevenueCat for subscription management. The subscription products exist in App Store Connect and are correctly configured, but they remain in "Waiting for Review". During App Review, the reviewer attempts to access the subscription paywall and receives an error stating that subscriptions are unavailable. This appears to happen because StoreKit cannot fetch the products while they are still waiting for review. This creates a loop: Subscriptions exist in App Store Connect and are in "Waiting for Review" App Review installs the app StoreKit cannot return the subscription products yet RevenueCat returns an "offerings_fetch_failed" error The reviewer sees "subscriptions unavailable" The app is rejected before the subscriptions are approved We have thoroughly verified the configuration: • Subscription group exists • All products are inside the group • Product IDs match exactly between App Store Connect and RevenueCat • RevenueCat is correctly configured with the Apple App Store API key • Offerings and packages are correctly configured in RevenueCat • The app correctly handles missing offerings and displays a fallback message • The latest TestFlight build shows a diagnostic message confirming the issue originates from StoreKit not returning products • The app build itself installs and runs normally This has now happened multiple review cycles and we have verified all configuration options. At this stage the only remaining explanation appears to be the order of the review process. It seems the subscriptions must be approved before StoreKit can return them, but the app is being evaluated before the subscriptions have been processed. Because of this, the reviewer sees the "subscriptions unavailable" message and rejects the app before the subscriptions have been approved. Is there a recommended process for submitting the first app version with auto-renewable subscriptions to avoid this situation? Specifically: • Should the subscriptions be approved before the app review begins? • Or is there a specific way to attach the subscriptions to the version when the "Add" option is not visible on the version page? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated as we have now thoroughly checked all configuration and believe this may be a review workflow issue rather than a configuration problem. Thank you.

I developed a cloud drive using fskit, but after mounting it, it did not appear in the Finder sidebar and the disk tool could not list it. How should I adapt? The mounting looks successful, and you can also open and see the fixed files I wrote in the code. I have also turned on the Finder sidebar settings function