Overview

Hi, posting here since I cannot get in touch with anyone through Support. I've sent few requests in a week but never heard back. I am trying to get the app 6745905294 approved from the Review team. The last blocker is that This app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps on the App Store This turns out to be because I used to have this app under a different team 3 years ago (app number 1592985083). The app was already out of the store in a long time since I didn't renew that team membership but apparently that's not enough. The Review team suggested me to Remove the old app. But...I can't. Please see the screenshot attached Any idea what can I do? I am completely blocked. I want to submit the app in the store with the new team I am in. The Review team says it can't help me. The Appstore Connect Support team doesn't reply Thanks, Alessandro

I'm using MusicKit for DRM track playback in my iOS app and a third party library to play local user-owned music on the file system and from the music library. This app is also supporting accessory devices that offer Bluetooth remote media control. The wish is to achieve parity between how the remote interacts with user owned music and the DRM / cloud / Apple Music tracks in my application music player. Track navigation, app volume (rather than system volume), and scrubbing need to work consistently on a mix of tracks which could alternate DRM and cloud status within one album or playlist. Apple Music queue and track pickers are not useful tools in my app. How can I support playing DRM and Apple Music tracks while not surrendering the remote control features to the system?

Hi everyone, I’m facing an issue with CloudKit sync getting stuck during initial device migration in my SwiftData-based app. The app follows a local-first architecture using SwiftData + CloudKit sync, and works correctly for: ✔ Incremental sync ✔ Bi-directional updates ✔ Small datasets However, when onboarding a new device with large historical data, sync becomes extremely slow or appears stuck. Even after two hours data is not fully synced. ~6900 Transactions 🚨 Problem When installing the app on a new iPhone and enabling iCloud sync: • Initial hydration starts • A small amount of data syncs • Then sync stalls indefinitely Observed behaviour: • iPhone → Mac sync works (new changes sync back) • Mac → iPhone large historical migration gets stuck • Reinstalling app / clearing container does not resolve issue • Sync never completes full migration This gives the impression that: CloudKit is trickling data but not progressing after a certain threshold. The architecture is: • SwiftData local store • Manual CloudKit sync layer • Local-first persistence • Background push/pull sync So I understand: ✔ Conflict resolution is custom ✔ Initial import may not be optimized by default But I expected CloudKit to eventually deliver all records. Instead, the new device remains permanently in a “partial state”. ⸻ 🔍 Observations • No fatal CloudKit errors • No rate-limit errors • No quota issues • iCloud is available • Sync state remains “Ready” • Hydration remains “mostlyReady” Meaning: CloudKit does not report failure — but data transfer halts. ⸻ 🤔 Questions Would appreciate guidance on: Is CloudKit designed to support large initial dataset migration via manual sync layers? Or is this a known limitation vs NSPersistentCloudKitContainer? ⸻ Does CloudKit internally throttle historical record fetches? Could it silently stall without error when record volume is high? ⸻ Is there any recommended strategy for: • Bulk initial migration • Progressive hydration • Forcing forward sync progress ⸻ Should initial migration be handled outside CloudKit (e.g. via file transfer / backup restore) before enabling sync? ⸻ 🎯 Goal I want to support: • Large historical onboarding • Multi-device sync • User-visible progress Without forcing migration to Core Data. ⸻ 🙏 Any advice on: • Best practices • Debugging approach • CloudKit behavior in such scenarios would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Hello, I am seeing sever delay in app review completion of my app. The version I submitted for review is pending since Feb 15th. This is the first time it happened like this as earlier it was quicker. I tried to contact apple through support email but have not received any update. Any suggestions on what I can do? Thank you.

Hello everyone, I’m currently experiencing a very long review time and wanted to ask for your advice or hear about your experiences. I submitted my two apps for their initial release 23 days ago. Ever since then, they have been stuck in the "Waiting for Review" status. Yesterday, I realized that my "Paid Apps Agreement" and Tax Forms (W-8BEN, etc.) were incomplete in App Store Connect. I immediately filled them out, and now all my banking, tax, and agreement statuses are successfully marked as "Active". My questions to the community are: Since the agreements are now active, will my apps automatically fall into the review queue, or do I need to trigger something? I submitted an "App Review Status" contact form to Apple Support today. Should I just wait for their response, or is it better to "Remove from Review" and resubmit them? (I am afraid of losing my place in the queue). Any insights or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Best, Berkay

Reading all the docs(1) I was under the impression that handling this error is well managed... Until I hit it and found out that the recommended handling options hide a crucial fact: in the catch block you can not do anything?! It's too late - everything is lost, no way to recover... All the docs mislead me that I can apply the Transcript trick in the catch block until I realised, that there is nothing there !!! This article here(2) enlightened me on the handling of this problem, but I must say (and the author as well) - this is a hack! So my questions: is there really no way to handle this exception properly? if not, can we have the most important information - the count of the context exposed through the official API (at least the known ones)? https://developer.apple.com/documentation/Technotes/tn3193-managing-the-on-device-foundation-model-s-context-window#Handle-the-exceeding-context-window-size-error-elegantly https://zats.io/blog/making-the-most-of-apple-foundation-models-context-window/

Recursive and Self-Referential Data Structures Combining recursive and self-referential data structures with frameworks like Accelerate, SwiftMacros, and utilizing SwiftUI hooks can offer significant benefits in terms of performance, maintainability, and expressiveness. Here is how Apple Intelligence breaks it down. Benefits: Natural Representation of Complex Data: Recursive structures, such as trees and graphs, are ideal for representing hierarchical or interconnected data, like file systems, social networks, and DOM trees. Simplified Algorithms: Many algorithms, such as traversals, sorting, and searching, are more straightforward and elegant when implemented using recursion. Dynamic Memory Management: Self-referential structures can dynamically grow and shrink, making them suitable for applications with unpredictable data sizes. Challenges: Performance Overhead: Recursive algorithms can lead to stack overflow if not properly optimized (e.g., using tail recursion). Self-referential structures can introduce memory management challenges, such as retain cycles. Accelerate Framework Benefits: High-Performance Computation: Accelerate provides optimized libraries for numerical and scientific computing, including linear algebra, FFT, and image processing. It can significantly speed up computations, especially for large datasets, by leveraging multi-core processors and GPU acceleration. Parallel Processing: Accelerate automatically parallelizes operations, making it easier to take advantage of modern hardware capabilities. Integration with Recursive Data: Matrix and Vector Operations: Use Accelerate for operations on matrices and vectors, which are common in recursive algorithms like those used in machine learning and physics simulations. FFT and Convolutions: Accelerate's FFT functions can be used in recursive algorithms for signal processing and image analysis. SwiftMacros Benefits: Code Generation and Transformation: SwiftMacros allow you to generate and transform code at compile time, enabling the creation of DSLs, boilerplate reduction, and optimization. Improved Compile-Time Checks: Macros can perform complex compile-time checks, ensuring code correctness and reducing runtime errors. Integration with Recursive Data: DSL for Data Structures: Create a DSL using SwiftMacros to define recursive data structures concisely and safely. Optimization: Use macros to generate optimized code for recursive algorithms, such as memoization or iterative transformations. SwiftUI Hooks Benefits: State Management: Hooks like @State, @Binding, and @Effect simplify state management in SwiftUI, making it easier to handle dynamic data. Side Effects: @Effect allows you to perform side effects in a declarative manner, integrating seamlessly with asynchronous operations. Reusable Logic: Custom hooks enable the reuse of stateful logic across multiple views, promoting code maintainability. Integration with Recursive Data: Dynamic Data Binding: Use SwiftUI's data binding to manage the state of recursive data structures, ensuring that UI updates reflect changes in the underlying data. Efficient Rendering: SwiftUI's diffing algorithm efficiently updates the UI only for the parts of the recursive structure that have changed, improving performance. Asynchronous Data Loading: Combine @Effect with recursive data structures to fetch and process data asynchronously, such as loading a tree structure from a remote server. Example: Combining All Components Imagine you're building an app that visualizes a hierarchical file system using a recursive tree structure. Here's how you might combine these components: Define the Recursive Data Structure: Use SwiftMacros to create a DSL for defining tree nodes. @macro struct TreeNode { var value: T var children: [TreeNode] } Optimize with Accelerate: Use Accelerate for operations like computing the size of the tree or performing transformations on node values. func computeTreeSize(_ node: TreeNode) -> Int { return node.children.reduce(1) { $0 + computeTreeSize($1) } } Manage State with SwiftUI Hooks: Use SwiftUI hooks to load and display the tree structure dynamically. struct FileSystemView: View { @State private var rootNode: TreeNode = loadTree() var body: some View { TreeView(node: rootNode) } private func loadTree() -> TreeNode<String> { // Load or generate the tree structure } } struct TreeView: View { let node: TreeNode var body: some View { List(node.children, id: \.value) { Text($0.value) TreeView(node: $0) } } } Perform Side Effects with @Effect: Use @Effect to fetch data asynchronously and update the tree structure. struct FileSystemView: View { @State private var rootNode: TreeNode = TreeNode(value: "/") @Effect private var loadTreeEffect: () -> Void = { // Fetch data from a server or database } var body: some View { TreeView(node: rootNode) .onAppear { loadTreeEffect() } } } By combining recursive data structures with Accelerate, SwiftMacros, and SwiftUI hooks, you can create powerful, efficient, and maintainable applications that handle complex data with ease.

I have migrated my code to use SMAppService but am running into trouble deleting the old SMJobBless launchd registration using launchd remove. I am invoking this from a root shell when I detect the daemon and associated plist still exist, then also deleting those files. The remove seems to work (i.e. no errors returned) but launchd list shows the service is registered, with a status code of 28 I am using the same label for SMAppService as previously and suspect this is the reason for the problem. However, I am reluctant to change the label as there will a lot of code changes to do this. If I quit my application, disable the background job in System Settings and run sudo launchd remove in the Terminal then it is removed and my application runs as expected once the background job is re-enabled. Alternatively, a reboot seems to get things going. Any suggestions on to how I could do this more effectively welcome.

I have made an app using Xcode 26.3 Release Candidate 2 for my Apple Watch that runs successfully on the simulator. Xcode comes with the IoS 26.2 and WatchOS SDK 26.2. However, when I do try to connect to my device that have IoS 26.3 and watchOS 26.3, I see a succesful connection to my iPhone but I see the the world symbol and wheel keeps trying to connect on my Apple Watch. I also tried Xcode 26.4 beta 2 with no luck. I reviewed the WatchOS Release Notes: The watchOS 26.2 SDK provides support to develop watchOS apps for Apple Watch devices running watchOS 26.3. The SDK comes bundled with Xcode 26.2, available from the Mac App Store. I also tried Xcode 26.2 but no luck. Any suggestions?

Our app, BeeBot (app ID 6451085742) has been in review since January 26th. We've done the following: Submitted a support ticket (no answer) Requested expedited review (no response, expedited review window came and went) Called support (no help, just told us to wait) This is an just an update, not a new app submission. I've been doing iOS dev for over 10 years and I never have seen review times this long. There's been no communication from Apple. What's going on?

Since macOS 26.4 Beta 1, virtual HID devices created via DriverKit can no longer intercept key events from the built-in MacBook keyboard. External keyboards still work. This is confirmed and tracked here: https://github.com/pqrs-org/Karabiner-Elements/issues/4402 One possible lead (from LLM-assisted analysis of Apple's open-source IOHIDFamily code and cross-referencing community reports): macOS 26.4 Beta may have introduced or modified a security policy referred to as com.apple.iohid.protectedDeviceAccess, which could block IOHIDDeviceOpen for the Apple Internal Keyboard connected via SPI transport (AppleHIDTransportHIDDevice). This appears related to a "GamePolicy" check in IOHIDDeviceClass.m that gates whether processes can open HID devices. This has not been independently verified and may or may not be the root cause. This has far-reaching consequences. Karabiner-Elements alone has over 21,000 GitHub stars and is used by hundreds of thousands of macOS users for keyboard customization, accessibility workflows, ergonomic setups, and multilingual input. This change completely breaks its core functionality on any MacBook. Beyond Karabiner, this affects every developer building keyboard remapping, input customization, or accessibility tooling via DriverKit virtual HID devices — including commercial applications currently in development. I'd argue that the power and flexibility of keyboard customization on macOS is a genuine competitive advantage for the platform. Developers and power users choose Macs partly because tools like this exist. Restricting this capability would be detrimental to the ecosystem and to Apple's appeal among professional users. I'd like to understand: is this an intentional security change or a regression? If intentional, is there a migration path?

Hello, I am trying to upload a watchOS standalone app to App Store Connect using Xcode 26.3, but Organizer does not show the “App Store Connect” upload option. It only displays: • Release Testing (Ad Hoc) • Enterprise • Debugging Project setup • Target type: watchOS App (standalone, not companion) • PRODUCT_TYPE = com.apple.product-type.application • PRODUCT_BUNDLE_PACKAGE_TYPE = APPL • WRAPPER_EXTENSION = app • SUPPORTED_PLATFORMS = watchos watchsimulator • Archive configuration: Release • Base SDK: watchOS The app does not depend on iOS. Bundle ID Originally: com.example.app.watchkitapp Recreated as: com.example.app HealthKit capability enabled in: • Developer Portal • Xcode (Signing & Capabilities) Signing • Apple Distribution certificate active • App Store provisioning profile created • Manual signing configured for Release (Apple Distribution + App Store profile) • Also tested Automatic signing • Deleted old Ad Hoc profiles • Cleared Derived Data and regenerated archive App Store Connect • App created successfully using bundle ID com.example.app • Account role: Account Holder • No pending Agreements, Tax, or Banking items Despite a valid Release archive signed with Apple Distribution, Organizer only allows Ad Hoc distribution and never shows “App Store Connect”. Is this a known issue in Xcode 26 affecting independent watchOS apps, or is there an additional configuration step required? Thank you.

Hello, I am reaching out regarding my latest update, which has remained in “Waiting for Review” status for an extended period. In the past, my updates have generally proceeded through review without significant delays, and I would normally be willing to wait if this were part of a broader backlog. However, based on recent experiences shared by fellow developers, it appears that this delay may not be affecting all accounts equally. For this reason, I would like to confirm whether there might be any specific issue with my submission. I have already submitted an expedited review request and contacted Developer Support, but I have not yet received any response. At this point, I would greatly appreciate confirmation on the following: Whether there are any issues blocking the review of this submission Whether any additional information is required from my side Or whether the app is simply still pending reviewer assignment I fully understand that the App Review team may be handling a high volume of submissions. If possible, I would sincerely appreciate it if someone could kindly take a look at my case. Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

I am writing a DriverKit driver for the first that uses the USBSerialDriverKit. The driver its purpose is to expose the device as serial interface (/dev/cu.tetra-pei0 or something like this). My problem: I don't see any logs from that driver in the console and I tried like 40 different approaches and checked everything. The last message I see is that the driver get successfully added to the system it is in the list of active and enabled system driver extensions but when I plug the device in none of my logs appear and it doesn't show up in ioreg. So without my driver the target device looks like this: +-o TETRA PEI interface@02120000 <class IOUSBHostDevice, id 0x10000297d, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (13 ms), retain 30> | { | "sessionID" = 268696051410 | "USBSpeed" = 3 | "UsbLinkSpeed" = 480000000 | "idProduct" = 36886 | "iManufacturer" = 1 | "bDeviceClass" = 0 | "IOPowerManagement" = {"PowerOverrideOn"=Yes,"DevicePowerState"=2,"CurrentPowerState"=2,"CapabilityFlags"=32768,"MaxPowerState"=2,"DriverPowerState"=0} | "bcdDevice" = 9238 | "bMaxPacketSize0" = 64 | "iProduct" = 2 | "iSerialNumber" = 0 | "bNumConfigurations" = 1 | "UsbDeviceSignature" = <ad0c16901624000000ff0000> | "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface" | "locationID" = 34734080 | "bDeviceSubClass" = 0 | "bcdUSB" = 512 | "USB Address" = 6 | "kUSBCurrentConfiguration" = 1 | "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"9dc7b780-9ec0-11d4-a54f-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"} | "UsbPowerSinkAllocation" = 500 | "bDeviceProtocol" = 0 | "USBPortType" = 0 | "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb")) | "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc." | "Device Speed" = 2 | "idVendor" = 3245 | "kUSBProductString" = "TETRA PEI interface" | "kUSBAddress" = 6 | "kUSBVendorString" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc." | } | +-o AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice <class AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice, id 0x100002982, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 5> | { | "IOProbeScore" = 50000 | "CFBundleIdentifier" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice" | "IOProviderClass" = "IOUSBHostDevice" | "IOClass" = "AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice" | "IOPersonalityPublisher" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice" | "bDeviceSubClass" = 0 | "CFBundleIdentifierKernel" = "com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice" | "IOMatchedAtBoot" = Yes | "IOMatchCategory" = "IODefaultMatchCategory" | "IOPrimaryDriverTerminateOptions" = Yes | "bDeviceClass" = 0 | } | +-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostDeviceUserClient, id 0x100002983, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 7> | { | "IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent" | "IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes | } | +-o IOUSBHostInterface@0 <class IOUSBHostInterface, id 0x100002986, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (5 ms), retain 9> | | { | | "USBPortType" = 0 | | "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"2d9786c6-9ef3-11d4-ad51-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"} | | "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc." | | "bcdDevice" = 9238 | | "USBSpeed" = 3 | | "idProduct" = 36886 | | "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb")) | | "bInterfaceSubClass" = 0 | | "bConfigurationValue" = 1 | | "locationID" = 34734080 | | "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface" | | "bInterfaceProtocol" = 0 | | "iInterface" = 0 | | "bAlternateSetting" = 0 | | "idVendor" = 3245 | | "bInterfaceNumber" = 0 | | "bInterfaceClass" = 255 | | "bNumEndpoints" = 2 | | } | | | +-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostInterfaceUserClient, id 0x100002988, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 6> | { | "UsbUserClientBufferStatistics" = {"IOMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOBufferMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOSubMemoryDescriptor"=0} | "IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent" | "UsbUserClientBufferAllocations" = {"Bytes"=0,"Descriptors"=0} | "IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes | } | +-o IOUSBHostInterface@1 <class IOUSBHostInterface, id 0x100002987, registered, matched, active, busy 0 (5 ms), retain 9> | { | "USBPortType" = 0 | "IOCFPlugInTypes" = {"2d9786c6-9ef3-11d4-ad51-000a27052861"="IOUSBHostFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/IOUSBLib.bundle"} | "USB Vendor Name" = "Motorola Solutions, Inc." | "bcdDevice" = 9238 | "USBSpeed" = 3 | "idProduct" = 36886 | "IOServiceDEXTEntitlements" = (("com.apple.developer.driverkit.transport.usb")) | "bInterfaceSubClass" = 0 | "bConfigurationValue" = 1 | "locationID" = 34734080 | "USB Product Name" = "TETRA PEI interface" | "bInterfaceProtocol" = 0 | "iInterface" = 0 | "bAlternateSetting" = 0 | "idVendor" = 3245 | "bInterfaceNumber" = 1 | "bInterfaceClass" = 255 | "bNumEndpoints" = 2 | } | +-o lghub_agent <class AppleUSBHostInterfaceUserClient, id 0x10000298a, !registered, !matched, active, busy 0, retain 6> { "UsbUserClientBufferStatistics" = {"IOMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOBufferMemoryDescriptor"=0,"IOSubMemoryDescriptor"=0} "IOUserClientCreator" = "pid 1438, lghub_agent" "UsbUserClientBufferAllocations" = {"Bytes"=0,"Descriptors"=0} "IOUserClientDefaultLocking" = Yes } more details in my comment.

I have a submission that required to be release asap since it's a showstopper for users at the moment. Can I please request for the app to be reviewed soon ? I sent an expedite request 2 hours ago. Submission ID 4d687ac2-a4a2-494d-a635-b3845adf86bc

When I create an archive file and attempt to upload the app using the "Distribute App" button, the upload fails with the error "Automatic signing cannot update bundle identifier...". (The detailed message is below.) When creating an archive file in Xcode, I unchecked "Automatically Manage Signing" and proceeded with the archive. The message says "Font Enumeration," but other apps with the same option enabled upload successfully. Therefore, I believe the "Font Enumeration" option is not the issue. I tried creating a new provisioning file, but it still doesn't work. I deleted all DerivedData files from my Mac storage, restarted Xcode, and tried again, but it still doesn't work. This keeps happening only for certain targets (specific apps) in Xcode. Does anyone know how to fix this? Xcode is the latest version. Message: Automatic signing cannot update bundle identifier "com.xxxxxx.xxxxxx". Automatic signing cannot update your registered bundle identifier to enable Font Enumeration. Update your bundle identifier on https://developer.apple.com/account and then try again.

It seems like every time an IOS update is installed, the camera app file formats get reset to defaults. This setting is not available to manage at the MDM level. Many people need the the most compatible settings for the purpose of file sharing. So, now we have nearly 1,000 devices with a complete mix of photo and video formats. And IT has wasted MANY hours converting files for people. Feature Request: Please either stop resetting the camera app file formats or allow us to manage those settings at the MDM level. Respectfully, Robert

Looking for any guidance on how to duplicate the Display Settings under "Display & Brightness" more specifically the Display Zoom.

My iOS app “TaskCal: Task Manager” (version 1.2.8) has been stuck in “Waiting for Review” for more than 3 weeks, and I’m not sure what else I can do at this point. I’d like to know if there’s anything wrong with my submission, or if there’s any other way to get more clarity from App Review. Here are the key dates (GMT+8): Jan 30, 2026 – Version 1.2.3 was approved and marked “Ready for Distribution”. Jan 31 – Feb 8, 2026 – I submitted version 1.2.8 multiple times. Several submissions were later marked as “Removed” in App Store Connect. Feb 9, 2026, 12:39 AM – I submitted version 1.2.8 again. This submission has been in “Waiting for Review” ever since. Today is Mar 3, 2026 (Taipei time) – The status is still “Waiting for Review” with no change. Because of this, I contacted Apple Developer Support multiple times through Contact Support. I only received one reply, on Feb 21, 2026, which said: Hello Alan, Thank you for reaching out to Developer Support about your app, “TaskCal: Task Manager.” I understand that you’re concerned. After reviewing your app’s submission history, I can confirm that your app is still in the “Waiting for Review” status as of February 8th 2026. To address your concern about the duration of the review, I’ve contacted the review team to bring this to their attention. At this time, there’s no further action required from your end. If the review team needs any additional information to complete the review, they’ll reach out to you directly. We appreciate your patience during this process. Your case number is 20000107493507. Stephanie Developer Support Since then, there has been no visible progress and no follow‑up messages. The App Review page still shows: Version: iOS 1.2.8 Status: Waiting for Review Case ID: 20000107493507 I completely understand that review times can vary, but: My previous version (1.2.3) was reviewed and approved normally. This is a relatively small productivity app with no major policy changes. It’s been over 3 weeks in “Waiting for Review” for this specific submission, with multiple earlier submissions of the same version being “Removed” without clear explanation in the UI. My questions: Is there anything I may have done wrong in the submission process (for example, causing multiple “Removed” submissions) that could block or delay this review? Is there any other official channel I can use to get more clarity beyond contacting Developer Support (which only confirmed that it’s “Waiting for Review”)? Has anyone here experienced a similar long “Waiting for Review” state recently, and if so, how was it resolved? I’m worried that there might be some issue with this build or with my account that I’m not seeing in App Store Connect. At the same time, I don’t want to keep canceling and re‑submitting if that could make the situation worse. Any advice from Apple or other developers who have gone through something similar would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Alan

I'm submitting a native macOS app (Swift/SwiftUI, arm64) that includes Sparkle.framework for auto-updates. All binaries are signed with a Developer ID Application certificate using --options runtime and --timestamp. I've submitted 12+ times over the past two days, both from local notarytool submit and from GitHub Actions CI. Every submission uploads successfully and returns a valid submission ID, but then stays at "In Progress" indefinitely — none have resolved to Accepted or Invalid. Two early submissions did eventually come back "Invalid" — Apple's rejection log showed the Sparkle nested binaries had ad-hoc signatures (they were being signed as individual Mach-O files instead of bundle directories). I fixed this with proper inside-out bundle signing. Since the fix, local codesign --verify --deep --strict passes cleanly, but all ~10 subsequent submissions remain stuck at "In Progress". 9UT54V24XG Would appreciate any guidance, or if someone from the notary team could check our queue. Happy to provide specific submission IDs.