Over the past two days, we've observed an unusual spike in requests from some iOS users to our server endpoint responsible for verifying App Store purchase receipts. After sampling and analyzing the data, we found that the cause is related to the behavior of StoreKit2.Transaction.updates. Specifically, when listening for transaction updates, the system returns a large number of historical transactions — some dating back as far as one year. These callbacks are interpreted as "new" transactions, which in turn trigger repeated calls to Apple’s receipt verification servers, leading to an abnormal surge in traffic and putting pressure on our backend services. This behavior is ongoing and is something we've never encountered in our previous experience. It appears to be outside of expected behavior, and we suspect it may be due to some kind of abnormality or unintended usage scenario. We would appreciate guidance on the following: Is this a known behavior or issue with StoreKit2? Are there specific device states or conditions that could cause the system to emit historical transactions in bulk? Are there any recommended practices for mitigating or filtering such transaction floods? We have attached logs for reference. Any help identifying the root cause or suggestions for investigation would be greatly appreciated. 2025-07-24 12:39:58.594 +0400 listenForTransactions :{ "appTransactionId" : "704289572311513293", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1713445834000, "originalTransactionId" : "430001791317037", "purchaseDate" : 1713445834000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1753346396278, "storefrontId" : "143481", } 2025-07-24 12:39:58.594 +0400 listenForTransactions :{ "appTransactionId" : "704289572311513293", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "c4f79de2-a027-4b34-b777-6851f83f7e64", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1713445849000, "originalTransactionId" : "430001791317270", "purchaseDate" : 1713445849000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1753346396278, "storefrontId" : "143481", "transactionId" : "430001791317270", } 2025-07-24 12:39:58.594 +0400 listenForTransactions :{ "appTransactionId" : "704289572311513293", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "02f305d7-0b2d-4d55-b427-192e61b99024", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1713511999000, "originalTransactionId" : "430001792218708", "purchaseDate" : 1713511999000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1753346396278, "storefrontId" : "143481", "transactionId" : "430001792218708", } 2025-07-24 12:39:58.598 +0400 [INFO] [MKPaymentService:23]: [XLPay] listenForTransactions :{ "appTransactionId" : "704289572311513293", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "5ca85907-1ab6-4160-828e-8ab6d3574d6f", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1713512034000, "originalTransactionId" : "430001792219189", "purchaseDate" : 1713512034000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1753346396278, "storefrontId" : "143481", "transactionId" : "430001792219189", } 2025-07-24 12:39:58.599 +0400 listenForTransactions :{ "appTransactionId" : "704289572311513293", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "04869b50-b181-4b69-b4ff-025175e9cf14", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1713512049000, "originalTransactionId" : "430001792219440", "purchaseDate" : 1713512049000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1753346396278, "storefrontId" : "143481", "transactionId" : "430001792219440", }

Hello everyone, For example, our app currently has one subscription group in App Store Connect with 5 plans (2 annual, 2 monthly, and 1 quarterly). By default, users can go into Apple Subscriptions in Settings and freely switch between all of these plans. However, our business requirement is to only allow users to stay on one annual plan and one quarterly plan. We don’t want them to switch to the other plans. My questions are: Is there any best practice or recommended approach to restrict subscription switching within the same group? Would removing the unwanted products from sale be the correct approach, or are there any risks/downsides with this method? Has anyone faced a similar situation and found a practical solution? Any guidance or shared experience would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Description of the Issue We are encountering issues with App Store Server Notifications, where the notification type received does not align with our expectations for subscription changes. Specifically, we receive DID_RENEW notifications in scenarios involving downgrades or intra-tier upgrades, which disrupts our backend subscription management logic and may lead to incorrect user subscription states and billing errors. Below are two reproducible scenarios with associated transaction data. Scenario 1: Downgrade from Premium Yearly (with 7-Day Trial) to Standard Yearly Steps to Reproduce: A user purchases the Premium Yearly subscription with a 7-day free trial (initial transaction ID: 700002116066502). On the day before the trial ends, the user downgrades to the Standard Yearly subscription via the App Store’s subscription management interface. Expected Behavior: We expect to receive a DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS or a similar downgrade notification (e.g., DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_PREF) to indicate the subscription plan has been downgraded, enabling immediate updates to the user’s subscription status. Actual Behavior: Upon downgrade, our server receives a DID_RENEW notification instead of a downgrade-specific notification. This causes our system to incorrectly interpret the action as a renewal of the Premium subscription rather than a downgrade to Standard, with no subsequent downgrade confirmation received. Relevant Transaction Data: New Transaction ID: 700002122810952 Notification Type: DID_RENEW Notification UUID: 26de9b0e-5d61-4893-b679-0bd18ae3d208 Original Transaction ID (Trial): 700002116066502 Scenario 2: Intra-Tier Upgrade from Standard Monthly to Standard Yearly Steps to Reproduce: A user purchases the Standard Monthly subscription. On the day before the monthly subscription expires, the user switches to the Standard Yearly subscription via the App Store’s subscription management interface. Expected Behavior: The original Monthly subscription expires normally, with a DID_EXPIRE notification received. Upon expiration, we expect a DID_RENEW or SUBSCRIBED notification for the new Yearly subscription to confirm its activation, allowing seamless transition of the user’s subscription plan. Actual Behavior: Immediately after the upgrade, our server receives a DID_RENEW notification for the new Yearly plan. No further notifications are received, including no DID_EXPIRE for the original Monthly subscription. This leaves our system unable to confirm the expiration of the Monthly plan, potentially resulting in duplicate active subscriptions in our records. Relevant Transaction Data: Transaction ID: 70002902074491 Notification Type: DID_RENEW Notification UUID: 3d35bc2f-e769-4549-bf50-d84d41b10342 Impact These notification discrepancies disrupt our subscription lifecycle management, potentially causing incorrect user entitlements, over-billing, and a degraded user experience. Requested Assistance Please confirm the correct notification types for these scenarios as per Apple’s documentation (e.g., App Store Server Notifications V2). Provide guidance on handling these edge cases, including any recent changes to notification logic. If this is a backend issue, please investigate the provided transaction IDs and Notification UUIDs. Thank you for your prompt assistance. We look forward to your response to help resolve this issue for our users. 问题描述： 我们在处理 App Store 订阅变更通知时发现，服务器接收到的通知类型与预期不符，具体表现为降级或同级升级场景下错误接收到 DID_RENEW 通知。这影响了我们后端订阅管理的逻辑，可能导致用户订阅状态和计费出现偏差。以下是两个可重现的场景及相关交易数据。 场景 1：高级年费（含 7 天试用）降级至标准年费 重现步骤： 用户购买高级年费订阅并开启 7 天免费试用（初始交易 ID：700002116066502）。 在试用期结束前一天，用户通过 App Store 的订阅管理界面降级至标准年费订阅。 预期行为： 我们预期会收到 DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS 或类似的降级通知（如 DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_PREF），以表明订阅计划已降级，从而允许我们立即更新用户订阅状态。 实际行为： 降级后，服务器立即收到 DID_RENEW 通知，而非降级相关通知。这导致系统误认为高级订阅仍在续订，而非降级为标准订阅，且后续未收到任何降级确认通知。 相关交易数据： 新交易 ID：700002122810952 通知类型：DID_RENEW 通知 UUID：26de9b0e-5d61-4893-b679-0bd18ae3d208 原始交易 ID（试用）：700002116066502 场景 2：标准月费订阅升级为标准年费订阅 重现步骤： 用户购买标准月费订阅。 在月费订阅到期前一天，用户通过 App Store 的订阅管理界面切换至标准年费订阅。 预期行为： 原月费订阅正常到期，预期收到 DID_EXPIRE 通知。 月费到期后，预期收到新年费订阅的 DID_RENEW 或 SUBSCRIBED 通知，以确认年费订阅开始，方便我们无缝切换用户订阅计划。 实际行为： 升级后，服务器立即收到新年费订阅的 DID_RENEW 通知。 后续未收到任何通知，包括原月费订阅的 DID_EXPIRE 通知。这导致我们无法确认月费订阅的到期状态，可能在记录中出现重复的活跃订阅。 相关交易数据： 交易 ID：70002902074491 通知类型：DID_RENEW 通知 UUID：3d35bc2f-e769-4549-bf50-d84d41b10342 影响： 这些通知异常干扰了我们的订阅生命周期管理，可能导致用户权益错误、潜在的重复计费以及用户体验下降。 请求协助： 请确认根据 Apple 文档（例如 App Store Server Notifications V2）在上述场景中应返回的正确通知类型。 请提供处理此类边缘场景的指导，包括通知逻辑的任何最新变更。 如果这是后端问题，请调查提供的交易 ID 和通知 UUID。 感谢您的及时协助，期待您的回复以帮助我们为用户解决问题。

Hello, I have 2 subscription group. Each group have different plans and promotional offer. I was set 1 month free promotional offer in all plans. While I subscribe any plan IAP sheet is not showing 1 month free promotional offer. I already used with new sandbox account. How can I get promotional offer in IAP sheet?

We are experiencing a critical issue where StoreKit 2 is returning empty products when using Product.products(for:), specifically on devices running iOS 18.4.

 This issue does not occur on iOS 18.3 or earlier.

 Steps:

 Created a subscription product (e.g. "upm1") in App Store Connect
 Confirmed the product is active, localised, and part of a valid subscription group
 Call the following Swift code using StoreKit 2:
 Task { do { let products = try await Product.products(for: ["upm1"]) print(products) } catch { print("Error: (error)") } } 4. Result: products is an empty list.

 This regression is blocking subscription testing on iOS 18.4. 

 Kindly someone please advise on a potential fix or workaround.

Use the following method to fetch： let appProducts = try await Product.products(for: productIdentifiers) The following checks have been carried out ✅ Must-check points App ID capabilities Subscription product status (ready to submit) Why The result is an empty array?

Hello All, We continue to receive post backs for campaigns which were run 6 months back. Our understanding is post back window is only 3 months, so checking to see if this is expected or any documentation will help. We are on SKAN4.0

I have three questions about verify receipt I use this api （https://buy.itunes.apple.com/verifyReceipt）to verify receipt is success or not. But since last month, this interface has started to return an error(21002). I see this document (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstorereceipts/verifyreceipt) say its Deprecated. My question is, is the error suddenly returned recently because the interface has been deprecated or for some other reason? (I haven't modified my code about this recently) I can not understand this document: （https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstorereceipts/validating_receipts_on_the_device） Does this mean that in the new version, as long as the app returns a payment success (purchaseDetails.status == PurchaseStatus.purchased), the payment is guaranteed to be successful, and my server does not need to request payment result verification from Apple's server? I try to use this (https://github.com/apple/app-store-server-library-java) to get TransactionInfo, but I dont konw to get Transaction status to know is success or not. my java server code : AppStoreServerAPIClient client = new AppStoreServerAPIClient(encodedKey, keyId, issuerId, bundleId, environment); TransactionInfoResponse response = client.getTransactionInfo(transactionId); (bug i can note get transaction status, how do i konw this Transaction is success or not)

I am attempting to test non-consumable sandbox purchases, however I am unable to select the "Approve Transaction" option after initiating a purchase. Leaving the transaction in a permanent pending state. I can view the transaction in the transaction manager by navigating to Debug -> Storekit -> Manage Transactions.. but the only available options to select are "Refund Transaction" or "Delete Transaction". What am I missing about Xcode or my environment that is preventing me from testing this purchase flow? Some more information about my set up. I have a .storekit file synced to AppStore Connect with my product Id. There's a StoreKitTestCertificate.cert saved in the project. I've tried running the build on my phone as Debug, Release and ReleaseForRunning all with the same behavior after making a purchase. My phone is logged into a sandbox test user apple account in the developer iOS settings

The documentation mentions the following: Verify your receipt first with the production URL; then verify with the sandbox URL if you receive a 21007 status code. This approach ensures you don’t have to switch between URLs while your app is in testing, in review by App Review, or live in the App Store. This way, you can use one server environment to handle both Sandbox and Production environments. It is necessary to pass App Review. However, I'm not manually hitting these URLs - I'm using Apple's libraries. Specifically, the environment is used in SignedDataVerifier and AppStoreServerAPIClient. (I can't link to these because, for some reason, the domain apple.github.io is not allowed. The documentation for these is only found there. You can find it quickly by searching these terms and the domain.) Here is how SignedDataVerifier is being used: const verifier = new SignedDataVerifier( appleRootCertificates, APPLE_ENABLE_ONLINE_CHECKS, APPLE_ENVIRONMENT, APPLE_BUNDLE_ID, APPLE_APP_ID ) const verifiedNotification: ResponseBodyV2DecodedPayload = await verifier.verifyAndDecodeNotification(signedPayload) if (!verifiedNotification) { // Failure return } Here is how AppStoreServerAPIClient is being used: const appStoreServerAPIClient = new AppStoreServerAPIClient( SIGNING_KEY, APPLE_IAP_KEY_ID, APPLE_IAP_ISSUER_ID, APPLE_BUNDLE_ID, APPLE_ENVIRONMENT ) const statusResponse: StatusResponse = await appStoreServerAPIClient.getAllSubscriptionStatuses(originalTransactionId, [Status.ACTIVE]) In the source code for SignedDataVerifier.verifyAndDecodeNotification, I can see that it throws a VerificationException(VerificationStatus.INVALID_ENVIRONMENT) error . So for SignedDataVerifier is it as simple as wrapping my code in a try/catch and checking that the error's status code is 21007? I'm unsure about this because if you scroll to the bottom of the linked source code file, you can see the enumeration VerificationStatus, but it's unclear if this member has a value of 21007. The source code for AppStoreServerAPIClient only says that it throws an APIException if a response could not be processed, so I'm not too sure about how to handle this one.

I'm running into a refund issue when testing in-app purchases in sandbox mode. I'm able to successfully purchase items but roughly 1 out of 3 times, when the refund window pops up, it says it cannot connect even though our webhook servers can verify the transaction id sent from apple. My internet connection is good and I've varied the wait period from purchase to refund from 15mins to 2 hours. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi All i have developed an app but when I go to download the paywall appears as it’s subscription only but it shows no prices for the subscription I get an endless swirl. I checked the product id etc and it’s correct but the subcription on my App Store Connect shows as approved. is there another status it needs to reach before it becomes like like ready for sale? https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/gameaware-pro/id6751592563

Hello! We are implementing consumable IAP for iOS using StoreKit 2 together with our own server backend. Our happy path looks like this: 1. Call /prepare on our server • We only allow one purchase at a time, so this fails if a pending transaction already exists. 2. Call /purchase via StoreKit 3. If successful, call /complete on our server 4. Call .finish() on the Transaction ⸻ The Problem Some users report being charged by Apple but not receiving coins. I suspect this happens in rare cases where the purchase flow throws an exception: • Every time we throw, we immediately cancel the transaction on our server. • However, some errors may actually be temporary. StoreKit seems to recover by later sending an update through Transactions.updates. • When that happens, since the transaction was already canceled on our server, we cannot match it. As a result, we just call .finish() without granting consumables. ⸻ Additional Observations From user logs, the issue tends to appear when the following errors are reported: • リクエストを完了できません。 • Triggered by: StoreKit.notEntitled • Triggered by: StoreKit.unknown • ヘルパーアプリケーションと通信できませんでした。 I was not able to reproduce the last one, even when testing all possible StoreKit configuration errors. Some sources suggest this may be a rare case where the app cannot communicate with the App Store itself. Additionally, affected users often seem to be using non-standard payment methods (PayPay, gift cards, carrier billing, etc.) rather than credit cards. ⸻ My Question What is the best practice for handling StoreKitError and PurchaseError? Specifically: • Should some of these errors be treated as temporary instead of final? • How should we ensure users always receive their consumables in such cases? ⸻ Code do { let result = try await wrapper.product.purchase() switch result { case .success(let result): let transaction = try StoreKitVerifier.checkVerified(result) let iOSPurchase = IOSPurchase(transaction: transaction, jws: result.jwsRepresentation) return .Success(purchase: iOSPurchase) case .userCancelled: return .Canceled() case .pending: return .Pending() @unknown default: return .Error( message: "Purchase result doesn't match with anything. This must not be executed") } } catch { return .Error(message: error.localizedDescription) }

I use [[SKPaymentQueue defaultQueue] restoreCompletedTransactions]. Works on my App which is in the store (compiled pre-iOS 26). If I compile the same App now, same codebase with Xcode Version 26.0, restore does not work. Nothing happens. Tested on real device (iOS 26). Documentation says its deprecated, but my deployment target is iOS 12. Anyone has similar issues? Any recommendations?

Hello all, Posting here before I put in a support ticket to see if there are any ideas. The previous beta issues seem to have been resolved, but now we are having intermittent problems with sandbox purchases. We do not know if this will affect real purchases. This is happening on beta 9 in both public and dev channels for us, most often on iPad Pro 4th. gen (Though idk if that is relevant). Sometimes running TestFlight builds on iOS 26 beta 9 devices we will have attempts to make sandbox purchases just go into a black hole. We do not get a "Do you want to buy this" popup, or the credentials screen. It just pauses for a bit in the section of our code that would be akin to: let result = try await product.purchase( options: [.appAccountToken(accountUUID) ] ) Then wait a couple seconds, and then nothing. The game returns to normal flow as if it was a pending purchase, but nothing more ever happens. We have not been able to get a local debug build to do this, so it's hard for us to tell if it is going into the pending bucket, the userCancelled bucket, or the unverified bucket, etc. If we take a device in this state and remove the app and reinstall from TestFlight we will get a credentials popup on the first attempt after install to buy, and after putting in our info we will get the " "You've already purchased this In-App Purchase...", but nothing ever his our listener and we return to the broken state. Has anyone else seen issues like this? P.S. Our StoreKit logic code is currently widely distributed, so if it was reproducible in the live version on iOS 18 we would know about it. Thanks, Chris

login sandbox account at setting > app store > sandbox account. download my app from testflight purchase subscription is fine. stop renew subscription. after subscription expired, delete app, then download from testflight again. tried to restore purchase, the result count always zero

We’ve been approved for the Advanced Commerce API and are setting up the generic product identifiers per the guide: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/advancedcommerceapi/setting-up-your-project-for-advanced-commerce#Set-up-generic-product-identifiers We have multiple auto-renewable subscriptions (for simplicity: Product 1, Product 2, etc.). We created a new subscription group for Advanced Commerce and are about to add the subscription(s) inside that group. Should we create one auto-renewable subscription (generic, e.g. subscription.ac) to represent all of our subscriptions, or one generic per product family (e.g., product1.ac, product2.ac, …)? If the answer depends on whether subscribers can hold multiple products simultaneously, please advise which structure supports that (e.g., separate groups). Reporting identifiers / segmentation: In Sales and Trends and Payments & Financial Reports, which identifier(s) will appear after migration: the legacy StoreKit product_id, the new generic product id, and/or the SKU? If we use a single generic subscription for all products, what’s Apple’s recommended way to segment revenue by product (Product 1 vs. Product 2)? If SKUs don’t surface in these reports, should we prefer multiple generics/groups to preserve report-level segmentation?

Hello Developer support, In one of our live application we have seen that users are purchasing weekly subscription and automatically they shifted to yearly product. Due to this we have received high revenue and also refunds afterwards. To prevent this we removed our yearly product from the sale. In App Store Connect we have seen activations for weekly product and convert to standard prices are yearly products. Also we have seen weird behavior of user getting trial for same product for three times. For developer support people I am sharing my app id - 1320373866 , and here is the video of our issue - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DBHw8ivgql4eNoo8NC3xo5v4wgr8Oh7x/view?usp=sharing , Also attaching trial behavior screenshot.

After game restart first purchase is contained in receipt but the next ones is the same as first one so new purchases is not added. I afraid players can be charged for purchase but on my server I will not receive new purchases instead receipt with old one so they can do not receive in game currency. Will in production I receive a receipts with new consumable every time player purchase it? I use Unity3d In-app purchasing 5.0.1.

Problem Summary Apple's provisioning servers are not generating the com.apple.developer.storekit entitlement for App ID com.driftnotes.app (Team ID: 43Y6AG5NPY), making it impossible to build iOS apps for physical devices despite all configurations being correct. Environment macOS: 15.3.1 (24D70) Xcode: 16.1 (xcode-select version 2409) Flutter: 3.35.2 • channel stable Account: Individual Developer (Kazakhstan) Bundle ID: com.driftnotes.app Team ID: 43Y6AG5NPY Error Message Error (Xcode): Provisioning profile "iOS Team Provisioning Profile: com.driftnotes.app" doesn't include the com.apple.developer.storekit entitlement. /Users/vyacheslavkuzin/Desktop/FlutterProjects/DriftNotesDart/ios/Runner.xcodeproj Steps to Reproduce Configure App ID with In-App Purchase capability (✅ verified in Developer Portal) Add In-App Purchase capability in Xcode project (✅ done) Configure entitlements file with StoreKit keys (✅ done) Enable automatic signing in Xcode (✅ done) Run: flutter build ios --release Build completes successfully ("Xcode build done. 13,8s") but fails at signing stage Expected vs Actual Result Expected: Provisioning profile should include com.apple.developer.storekit entitlement Actual: Profile is created WITHOUT the entitlement, despite all configurations being correct Configuration Details Developer Portal App ID com.driftnotes.app has In-App Purchase capability enabled ✅ All agreements are active in App Store Connect ✅ Xcode Project In-App Purchase capability added via Signing & Capabilities ✅ Automatically manage signing: Enabled ✅ Team: 43Y6AG5NPY (Vyacheslav Kuzin) ✅ Entitlements File (ios/Runner/Runner.entitlements) <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>com.apple.developer.in-app-payments</key> <array> <string>merchant.com.driftnotes.app</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.storekit</key> <true/> </dict> </plist> Build Settings CODE_SIGN_ENTITLEMENTS: Runner/Runner.entitlements ✅ PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER: com.driftnotes.app ✅ DEVELOPMENT_TEAM: 43Y6AG5NPY ✅ Troubleshooting Attempted Multiple Attempts Profile Recreation: Manual and automatic profiles recreated dozens of times Cache Cleanup: Complete removal of: ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/* ~/Library/MobileDevice/Provisioning\ Profiles/* Flutter clean & pod cache clean Signing Methods: Tested both manual and automatic signing management Wait Periods: 48+ hours for server propagation Complete Profile Deletion: Removed ALL profiles from Developer account per Apple Support Apple Support Workaround Following Senior Advisor recommendation: ✅ Deleted all provisioning profiles from account ✅ Confirmed IAP capability in project ✅ Created StoreKit Configuration File for testing ✅ Verified automatic signing management ✅ Multiple "Try Again" attempts in Xcode Result: Problem persists Apple Support Reference Case #102680105923 - Senior Advisor Simone confirmed after internal team consultation that this requires engineering team attention and directed to Developer Forums. Technical Analysis What Works Flutter build completes successfully Pod install executes without issues (25,9s) Xcode build finishes successfully (13,8s) All dependencies resolve correctly What Fails Provisioning profile generation: Server creates profile but omits StoreKit entitlement All profile types affected: Both manual and automatic profiles Consistent across configurations: Debug, Release, Profile all fail identically Root Cause This appears to be a server-side bug where Apple's provisioning systems are not properly correlating the App ID's In-App Purchase capability with the StoreKit entitlement generation for this specific App ID (com.driftnotes.app). The issue is NOT in client-side configuration - all settings match Apple's official documentation exactly. The problem occurs during the server-side provisioning profile generation process. Request for Engineering Team This issue requires attention from Apple's provisioning infrastructure team to resolve the server-side entitlement generation bug for App ID com.driftnotes.app. Impact Critical: Complete inability to build iOS app for physical devices Business: Blocking app deployment and updates Developer Experience: Extensive time spent on troubleshooting correctly configured setup All configurations have been verified multiple times and match Apple's official documentation. The issue has been escalated through Apple Support (Case #102680105923) and requires engineering team intervention.