I have found a possible performance issue with the Network Extension related to NEFilterPacketProvider. When a packet filter is disabled, my Mac gets the expected Internet upload speed. When an NEFilterPacketProvider is enabled, outbound/upload throughput drops substantially. The interesting part is that this is reproducible with a deliberately minimal test provider. The test provider only: receives packets; parses headers of several common protocols; writes diagnostic information using Unified Logging; allows all captured packets. It does not intentionally delay, modify, or drop packets, and it does not perform any other heavy processing or network activity. Reproduction Run a speed test at https://yandex.ru/internet/ with the packet filter disabled; Record the outbound/upload speed; Enable the NEFilterPacketProvider; Run the same test again; The outbound speed drops significantly; Disable the provider and repeat the test — the speed returns to the previous level; The effect is particularly noticeable on the outbound/upload direction; download performance is much less affected. For example: Configuration Download Upload Packet filter disabled ~700 Mbps ~600 Mbps Packet filter enabled ~700 Mbps ~110 Mbps I've submitted a Feedback Assistant report with a minimal reproducible sample - FB24686601. The sample is attached to the feedback. Has anyone else observed a similar outbound throughput reduction when NEFilterPacketProvider is enabled? I'm particularly interested in whether this is expected overhead of the packet-filtering architecture, a known limitation, or a possible macOS/Network Extension regression.

PDF files previewed from government websites are having passwords restrictions applied to all functions - view, print etc., this was a known error a few versions back but it seems to have been reintroduced in the iPadOS27 beta. It is reproducible and I have used a Linux machine to access the same file with no errors.

I'm encountering an issue with front camera video recordings via browser (Safari/Chrome) on devices running iOS/iPadOS 18 and above: On iPad, the recorded video appears upside down. On iPhone, the recorded video is rotated 90 degrees. The rear camera functions correctly without orientation issues. This problem seems specific to browser-based recordings, as the native Camera app records videos with the correct orientation. Has anyone else experienced this behavior? Is there a known workaround or fix? The preview while recording is fine, the recorded video is oriented incorrectly.

Hello Apple engineers and developers, I’m the owner/developer of https://mated.uz/, a legitimate SaaS platform for businesses in Uzbekistan. We have been experiencing a serious issue with Safari for approximately one month: Safari incorrectly displays a red “Fraudulent Website Warning” for our website. The important part is that the problem appears to be Safari-specific. The website works normally in: Chrome Microsoft Edge Firefox other browsers The website is a legitimate business platform and does not contain phishing pages, malware, deceptive content, or attempts to impersonate Apple or another service. What we have already done We have repeatedly submitted the domain for review through Apple’s website review process, including several requests over the past month. However, the warning is still present and we have not received a clear explanation of what is triggering the classification. We have also checked the website and its infrastructure for common causes: HTTPS / TLS certificate is valid No intentional redirects to suspicious domains No phishing or credential-harvesting pages No malware No deceptive content The website works correctly in other browsers The domain is actively used by a real operating business The problem This is becoming a real business issue because users who open our website from an iPhone or Mac using Safari may see a warning that effectively tells them our business is fraudulent. For a SaaS company, this significantly damages user trust and can prevent potential customers from accessing the platform. We would really appreciate guidance from Apple engineers on the following: How can we determine why Safari has classified our domain as fraudulent? Does Safari use an independent reputation database for this warning, separate from Google Safe Browsing? Is there any technical information or diagnostic data that website owners can use to identify the reason for the classification? Is there another escalation/review channel when the standard Website Review requests do not resolve a false positive? Are there specific DNS, hosting, redirect, TLS, domain-reputation, or third-party-script signals that we should investigate? We are happy to provide screenshots, domain information, security scan results, or any other technical information required. This appears to be a false positive affecting Safari only, and we would really appreciate any guidance on how to get the domain reviewed and the warning removed. Thank you.

We’re suddenly seeing valid Apple Wallet .pkpass files blocked inside Instagram and Messenger, with a “connection is not secure” warning. The exact same file works perfectly in Safari and outside Meta apps. We’ve reproduced it with a known-valid .pkpass hosted independently, so this doesn’t appear to be related to the pass file or hosting infrastructure. Has anyone else seen this since the latest Instagram / Messenger updates? Instagram/Messenger in-app browser → blocked Safari → works Interested to hear from anyone working with Apple Wallet / .pkpass / WKWebView.

I’m packaging a Safari Web Extension using the web-based Safari Web Extension Packager in App Store Connect. The ZIP uploads successfully, the manifest is accepted, and the Packager automatically creates the related Extension identifier. However, every build fails during export with: Exporting for App Store Distribution failed. Please download the logs artifact for more information. It also shows: Exporting for Development Distribution failed. Please download the logs artifact for more information. There is no Logs, Artifacts, or Download button on the build or issue page. To isolate the problem, I tested: Manifest V2 and Manifest V3 A minimal extension containing only HTML and icons No JavaScript, permissions, host permissions, APIs, or external dependencies A completely new App Store Connect app A new explicit Bundle ID A name-matched extension ZIP Multiple version and build numbers Every test produced exactly the same export errors. The App Store Connect agreement is active, and the Account Holder has access to cloud-managed distribution certificates. Because even a clean minimal extension and a newly created app fail identically, this appears to happen during cloud signing, provisioning, or archive export—not while parsing the extension. Questions: How can I download the logs artifact requested by the error when the Packager interface does not provide it? Can Apple confirm whether the web-based Packager currently has an export or automatic-signing issue? Is there any required certificate, provisioning profile, App ID configuration, or account permission that the Packager does not create automatically?

I’m packaging a Safari Web Extension using the web-based Safari Web Extension Packager in App Store Connect. The ZIP uploads successfully, the manifest is accepted, and the Packager automatically creates the related Extension identifier. However, every build fails during export with: Exporting for App Store Distribution failed. Please download the logs artifact for more information. It also shows: Exporting for Development Distribution failed. Please download the logs artifact for more information. There is no Logs, Artifacts, or Download button on the build or issue page. To isolate the problem, I tested: Manifest V2 and Manifest V3 A minimal extension containing only HTML and icons No JavaScript, permissions, host permissions, APIs, or external dependencies A completely new App Store Connect app A new explicit Bundle ID A name-matched extension ZIP Multiple version and build numbers Every test produced exactly the same export errors. The App Store Connect agreement is active, and the Account Holder has access to cloud-managed distribution certificates. Because even a clean minimal extension and a newly created app fail identically, this appears to happen during cloud signing, provisioning, or archive export—not while parsing the extension. Questions: How can I download the logs artifact requested by the error when the Packager interface does not provide it? Can Apple confirm whether the web-based Packager currently has an export or automatic-signing issue? Is there any required certificate, provisioning profile, App ID configuration, or account permission that the Packager does not create automatically?

When a link contains a quote character the rendering looks off, for example https://example.com/a"b in a sentence. Is that expected behavior? Thanks.

We tested iOS 27 Public Beta 4 and encountered an issue with our web app, which runs on smartphones. There is no problem when displaying RGB images stored in our cloud system. However, when displaying CMYK images, they sometimes fail to render entirely and appear completely white. After refreshing the screen several times, the images may appear intermittently—sometimes displaying correctly and sometimes not. What could be causing this issue? Please help us.

Hi! I currently have a web extension sucessfully published to Firefox. And now I'm trying to make the same web extension available for Safari. But I am having some trouble. Steps to reproduce this issue: Through appstoreconnect I create a new app. Within the app I select the tab Xcode Cloud, and scroll down to the Safari Web Extension Packager. When I try to upload a .zip file of my extension I get the error message: "NetworkError when attempting to fetch resource." According to the docs this upload feature should be compatible with any browser. I'm using Firefox version 154 running on Linux Mint 22.3. Note to forum admins: I originally tried to post this under subtopic Web Extensions but for some reason I kept getting an error when hitting "Post". That's why I'm posting this issue under the sub-topic General.

I’m the owner of sofiaproduction.ru, a legitimate videography portfolio website. Safari on iPhone continues to display a red “Fraudulent Website Warning”. The warning is reproducible on multiple iPhones and networks. The website has no login, payments, downloads, deceptive redirects, or forms requesting personal or financial information. A technical audit found no malware, phishing content, credential collection, external scripts, or TLS/DNS problems. Google Safe Browsing currently classifies the domain as clean. I have already submitted multiple requests through Apple Website Review and filed Feedback Assistant report FB24432044 with a sysdiagnose captured immediately after reproducing the warning. Apple Support confirmed that phone support cannot handle Safari website-classification issues. A separate Security Research report was closed as out of scope without being routed to the responsible team. The warning remains. Could an Apple engineer please confirm the correct escalation path or help route FB24432044 to the team responsible for Safari Fraudulent Website Warning / Safe Browsing classification? I can provide any additional technical evidence required.

Hi , I have the DB 7 of Ios 27 on 17 Pro Max and Ipad Pro M5 . This alert appeared on my iPhone for the first time yesterday whilst I was reading an online article, and it reappeared this morning. On my iPad Pro, however, it doesn’t appear… I’m also running iOS 27, build 7, on my iPad Pro.