To learn how to develop/distribute a DriverKit driver (DEXT) and a UserClient app correctly, I am trying to run the following sample dext and app. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/driverkit/communicating-between-a-driverkit-extension-and-a-client-app?language=objc I walked throught steps in README.md included in the project and faced issues. First, I referred the "Configure the Sample Code Project" section in the README.md and configured the sample code project to build with automatic signing. I could run the app and activate the dext successfully and made sure the app could communicate with the dext. Next, I tried the manual signing. I followed steps described in the "Configure the Sample Code Project" section carefully. The following entitlements has already been assigned to my team account. DriverKit Allow Any UserClient Access DriverKit USB Transport - VendorID DriverKit I could build both app and dext and could run the app. However, when I clicked the "Install Dext" button to activate the dext, I got the following error: sysex didFailWithError: extension category returned error Am I missing something? I would also like to know detailed steps to publicly distribute my dext and app using our Developer ID Application Certificate, as README.md only shows how to configure the project for development. Xcode version: 16.3 (16E140) Development OS: macOS 15.5 (24F74) Target OS: macOS 15.5 (24F74)

So I just updated Xcode to 16.3 and updated a project to its recommended build settings which includes "Register App Groups". So I have an outside Mac App Store app that uses app groups. Here we have an action extension. I can't debug it, can't get it to run. Nothing useful in Xcode is displayed when I try... but it looks like a code signing issue when I run and have Console open. So I try to make a provisioning profile manually and set it...didn't work. I noticed now though in signing & capabilities the group id is in red...like it's invalid, or something? This was a "macOS styled" group without the "group." prefix. So am I supposed to switch it to have the group. prefix? It makes the red text go away (no warnings or anything about app groups here, just red text). So if I change it to group. prefix..does that make an entire new container?What happens on app update for installs that don't have group. prefix? Does the system transparently migrate the group? Or Am I supposed to migrate the entire group container to the identifier with group. prefix? Also how does this affect running on older version of macOS? If I go with the "group." prefix to make the red text go away,.. what happens on macOS 11.0? Got a little more than I bargained for here after midnight.

Hi, For the purposes of iteration speed in development builds, on an iPhone in development mode, I am attempting to use hot reloaded dylibs. The goal is that the app is rarely fully restarted and small code changes can be applied quickly, drastically reducing iteration speed. For this purpose I have a socket server on my Mac that sends changed dylibs to my app on my iPhone. This works great on Mac, however on iOS i am running into codesigning problems. I am using the following to codesign the dylib: codesign -f -s XXX --timestamp=none testlibrary-ios.dylib I am placing the downloaded dylib in this folder: const char* cachedirectoryPath = [NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(NSCachesDirectory, NSUserDomainMask, YES)[0] UTF8String]; dlopen gives me the following error: dlopen(/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/67A3D31B-6F72-4939-9E7F-665FC78CDC61/Library/Caches/testlibrary-ios.dylib, 0x000A): tried: '/usr/lib/system/introspection/testlibrary-ios.dylib' (no such file, not in dyld cache), '/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/67A3D31B-6F72-4939-9E7F-665FC78CDC61/Library/Caches/testlibrary-ios.dylib' (code signature invalid in <78A101AD-D756-3526-8754-8B7F4925DE90> '/private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/67A3D31B-6F72-4939-9E7F-665FC78CDC61/Library/Caches/testlibrary-ios.dylib' (errno=1) sliceOffset=0x00000000, codeBlobOffset=0x0000C2E0, codeBlobSize=0x00004990), .... Is loading a dylib like this on iPhones in development mode possible? Any idea what is going wrong with codesigning or installing the dylib? (Obviously this code is never deployed in an app that goes on the AppStore)

I'm about at my wit's end trying to figure out why I can sign and notarize code, but am unable to staple the notarization, no matter what I do. I've reinstalled Xcode, reinstalled certificates, and tried about every suggestion that I can find, but still no luck. 2023 M3 MacBook Pro, OS X 15.3.1, Xcode 16.2. I have created a very basic Xcode app to test this with. I am building the project: codegen generate && xcodebuild -project SimpleNotarizationTest.xcodeproj -scheme SimpleNotarizationTest -configuration Release clean build (see attached file for build log) build-log.txt The signature and entitlements verify: codesign -d --entitlements :- ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-*/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app Output: Executable=/Users/minter/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-ecqihdiubptfnldimmjgnqpjr xun/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app/Contents/MacOS/SimpleNotarizationTest warning: Specifying ':' in the path is deprecated and will not work in a future release <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "https://www.apple .com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"><plist version="1.0"><dict><key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key><true/><k ey>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-only</key><true/></dict></plist> I created a zip file: ditto -c -k --keepParent ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-*/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app SimpleNotarizationTest.zip I submitted the app for notarization and it was approved: xcrun notarytool submit SimpleNotarizationTest.zip --apple-id "$APPLE_ID" --password "$APPLE_APP_SPECIFIC_PASSWORD" --team-id "$APPLE_TEAM_ID" --wait Output: Conducting pre-submission checks for SimpleNotarizationTest.zip and initiating connection to the Apple notary service... Submission ID received id: d2c0d6b0-cd55-4fa6-b958-09767d562a33 Upload progress: 100.00% (23.6 KB of 23.6 KB) Successfully uploaded file id: d2c0d6b0-cd55-4fa6-b958-09767d562a33 path: /Users/minter/tmp/simple-app-stapling/SimpleNotarizationTest.zip Waiting for processing to complete. Current status: Accepted......... Processing complete id: d2c0d6b0-cd55-4fa6-b958-09767d562a33 status: Accepted I attempt to staple the app: xcrun stapler staple -v ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-*/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app And it fails. See verbose stapling log. verbose-stapling-log.txt The top line is that it finds and downloads the ticket, but can't/won't staple. Downloaded ticket has been stored at file:///var/folders/dd/cgm9_v3n399_zqqsphgzs5jh0000gn/T/1b7cb7d8-9a9e-462c-831b-09de1b896d9e.ticket. Could not validate ticket for /Users/minter/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-ecqihdiubptfnldimmjgnqpjrxun/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app The staple and validate action failed! Error 65. Wade-Minter~/tmp/simple-app-stapling(:|✔) % From my debugging, I can say: The code signature appears valid and includes a secure timestamp from Feb 23, 2025 The app is properly signed with Developer ID Application The notarization ticket is being successfully retrieved from Apple's servers (as shown in the verbose output) The ticket is being downloaded to a temporary location, but the stapler is failing to validate it with error 65 The app bundle structure appears complete with all required components The CDHash matches between the code signature and the notarization ticket: 604544b32d7074dd77e2e6f2070f6e2d41f6368d If I run: spctl -a -vv ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-*/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app The output is: Wade-Minter~/tmp/simple-app-stapling(:|✔) % spctl -a -vv ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-*/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotaspctlionTest.app /Users/minter/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/SimpleNotarizationTest-ecqihdiubptfnldimmjgnqpjrxun/Build/Products/Release/SimpleNotarizationTest.app: rejected source=Unnotarized Developer ID origin=Developer ID Application: Fourth Line LLC (6U2KJ5KDT4) To summarize: The app is being recognized as "Unnotarized Developer ID" despite successful notarization The stapler is able to retrieve the ticket but fails during validation The error code 65 consistently appears during stapling attempts All code signing and bundle integrity checks pass The notarization ticket is being successfully downloaded but not successfully attached Any insight will be appreciated, since I've exhausted every option that I can find.

Hi everyone, I applied for CarPlay Entitlements on [Date 04. 26, 2024] using CarPlay is Case ID "13045151". I haven't received any updates or responses regarding my application yet. It's been 7 days since the application. My service requires CarPlay integration with a Black Box device. The primary purpose of this integration is to allow users to configure device settings through CarPlay. Furthermore, we plan to utilize the "Communication" category of Entitlements to notify users of parking incidents detected by the Black Box device while parked. This functionality is crucial for alerting drivers to potential issues affecting their vehicles. Could anyone share their experience with the typical turnaround time for CarPlay Entitlements, especially for applications involving device integration and the "Communication" category? Is this delay normal? Is there any way to check the application status or contact the appropriate team to inquire about its progress? Thank you for any insights or advice you can provide! Sincerely,

I have a binary which I have signed with a valid developer certificate. Here is how I verify the signature was correctly applied: % codesign -dvv ./test_program.exe Executable=/Users/REDACTED/code_signing/test_program.exe Identifier=com.REDACTED.hello_world Format=Mach-O thin (arm64) CodeDirectory v=20500 size=489 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=9+2 location=embedded Signature size=9071 Authority=Mac Developer: REDACTED NAME (REDACTED_ID) Authority=Apple Worldwide Developer Relations Certification Authority Authority=Apple Root CA Timestamp=Apr 16, 2025 at 11:26:43 AM Info.plist=not bound TeamIdentifier=REDACTED Runtime Version=14.2.0 Sealed Resources=none Internal requirements count=1 size=192 ============================== Additionally, I have confirmed in keychain access that my certificate is valid. Here is the output from the GUI: Issued by: Apple Worldwide Developer Relations Certification Authority Expires: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 at 3:50:14 PM Eastern Daylight Time This certificate is valid ============================== When I zip then send the executable for notarization, I get an "Invalid" response. Here is the log from that response: % xcrun notarytool submit ./test_program.zip --keychain-profile REDACTED --wait Conducting pre-submission checks for test_program.zip and initiating connection to the Apple notary service... Submission ID received id: 0d64c285-eb59-4b34-b911-0e6cbb1dbc16 Upload progress: 100.00% (6.39 KB of 6.39 KB) Successfully uploaded file id: 0d64c285-eb59-4b34-b911-0e6cbb1dbc16 path: /Users/REDACTED/code_signing/test_program.zip Waiting for processing to complete. Current status: Invalid......... Processing complete id: 0d64c285-eb59-4b34-b911-0e6cbb1dbc16 status: Invalid =============================== And here is the log indicating the reason for the notarization failure: xcrun notarytool log "0d64c285-eb59-4b34-b911-0e6cbb1dbc16" --keychain-profile REDACTED "./log_file.txt" { "logFormatVersion": 1, "jobId": "0d64c285-eb59-4b34-b911-0e6cbb1dbc16", "status": "Invalid", "statusSummary": "Archive contains critical validation errors", "statusCode": 4000, "archiveFilename": "test_program.zip", "uploadDate": "2025-04-16T16:23:38.993Z", "sha256": "9e3bd03301f4930a0e4015873b435c8d64c291e7c63d0552f17652dc7ce16195", "ticketContents": null, "issues": [ { "severity": "error", "code": null, "path": "test_program.zip/test_program.exe", "message": "The binary is not signed with a valid Developer ID certificate.", "docUrl": "https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/notarizing_macos_software_before_distribution/resolving_common_notarization_issues#3087721", "architecture": "arm64" } ] } ============================== The notarization server saying that it's not signed by a valid developer certificate, but to the best of my ability I have confirmed that a valid developer certificate is being used.

I am trying to get a PKG installer through the Apple codesign and notarytool process. When I submit the PKG installer I get a status message of "Invalid" and when I review the log file it has 2 errors. For "status summary" it says: "Archive contains critical validation errors", and for "message" it says" "The binary is not signed". The installer contains a flat file that is installed in the "Users/Shared" folder via the PKG installer. Here are the steps I've taken to get the installer through the codesign and notarytool process. codesign the file that's placed in the "Users/Shared" folder: codesign --options=runtime --sign 'Developer ID Application: XYZ' -v /Users/.../Documents/folder/"flat file" which I get a message saying "signed generic". Create the PKG installer with the signed "flat file". Sign the PKG installer containing the signed "flat file": codesign --options=runtime --sign 'Developer ID Application: XYZ' -v /Users/.../Documents/folder/"flat file" which I get a message saying "signed generic". Submit the PKG file with notarytool: xcrun notarytool submit /Users/.../Documents/folder/"flat file" --verbose --apple-id username --password password --team-id ID# --progress It completes and provides the submission ID. I check the status and get the error message that it's invalid. When I check the full details via the log I get the error messages mentioned above. What am I missing or failing to do?

When I first tried to sign my local unit test with the identity generated by Xcode, it failed because the intermediate certificate was missing. In that case, the error message explained that the trust chain could not be completed. But after installing the correct intermediate, codesign still fails, but no longer gives any explanation: codesign -f -s '0EFE7E591A4E690842094B8EC5AFDFE059637D3C' build/Darwin-Xcode-arm64_obf/bin/Release/UNITTEST build/Darwin-Xcode-arm64_obf/bin/Release/UNITTEST: replacing existing signature build/Darwin-Xcode-arm64_obf/bin/Release/UNITTEST: errSecInternalComponent It's the same error line "errSecInternalComponent". Is there a log somewhere that might explain what exactly is the error?

I am trying to distribute my Unity app to test flight. Build works on iPhone locally, archiving also works but when I start distribution to test flight I get this Error codesign command failed (/var/folders/gn/ql1bht8j2z7b18b3xtt0j7rr0000gn/T/XcodeDistPipeline.~~~2gmyFJ/Root/Payload/TondoJigsaw2.app/Frameworks/UnityFramework.framework: replacing existing signature /var/folders/gn/ql1bht8j2z7b18b3xtt0j7rr0000gn/T/XcodeDistPipeline.~~~2gmyFJ/Root/Payload/TondoJigsaw2.app/Frameworks/UnityFramework.framework: invalid or corrupted code requirement(s) Requirement syntax error(s): line 1:152: unexpected token: sQuaricon ) I am not sure what is the problem Team name is: “sQuaricon” Name Surname s.p. Bundle ID is: com.Squaricon.TondoJigsaw2 When I change bundle ID to com.testasd.TondoJigsaw2 (I do this in Xcode before archiving) that error disappears and I reach the part where I have to pick language. Even though this is not the solution, I think it is interesting, it implies issue might be with Bundle ID but this bundle ID is correct. I am using "automatically manage signing", I did not create any provisioning profile or certificate manually.

Yes, this is very likely the completely wrong way to do things but I would like to ask regardless. Currently with windows/linux I can perform an in-situ upgrade of an application by performing a download of the binary 'foo' and then doing a rename-and-replace and subsequently requesting the licencee to restart the program and all is good. With macOS, as the binary is within the foo.app ( Contents/macOS/foo ) I imagine I cannot perform a similar operation without breaking the signing of the foo.app itself? ....or, can I individually sign the binary foo for macOS and perform the same type of operation? Download new foo as foo.new rename current foo.app/Content/macOS/foo -> foo.old rename foo.new -> foo Restart application Again, I know this is very likely an un-macOS way of performing the task but as you can imagine with supporting cross-platform development it's usually easier to maintain a consistent method even if it's "not ideal".

Hello, I am trying without luck to create a .dmg or .pkg for my electron app that can be opened by any user on a mac. Every time I fail. All is happening by the same pattern. Here is the last try with creating a .pkg instead of .dmg. The app is built and it is signed correctly (I suppose) codesign --verify --verbose=1 dist/mac-universal/VIVIDTIME.app dist/mac-universal/VIVIDTIME.app: valid on disk dist/mac-universal/VIVIDTIME.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement I created a .pkg pkgbuild --root "dist/mac-universal/VIVIDTIME.app" \ --install-location "/Applications/VIVIDTIME.app" \ --identifier "app.vividtime.mac" \ --version "1.1.0" \ --sign "Developer ID Installer: Pavel Bochkov-Rastopchin (2QKDCTR5Y3)" \ dist/VIVIDTIME.pkg pkgbuild: Inferring bundle components from contents of dist/mac-universal/VIVIDTIME.app pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/Mantle.framework pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/VIVIDTIME Helper.app pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/VIVIDTIME Helper (GPU).app pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/Electron Framework.framework pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/Squirrel.framework pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/VIVIDTIME Helper (Renderer).app pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/VIVIDTIME Helper (Plugin).app pkgbuild: Adding component at Contents/Frameworks/ReactiveObjC.framework pkgbuild: Using timestamp authority for signature pkgbuild: Signing package with identity "Developer ID Installer: Pavel Bochkov-Rastopchin (2QKDCTR5Y3)" from keychain /Users/innrvoice/Library/Keychains/login.keychain-db pkgbuild: Adding certificate "Developer ID Certification Authority" pkgbuild: Adding certificate "Apple Root CA" pkgbuild: Wrote package to dist/VIVIDTIME.pkg

Thanks in advance for any hint to solve the following account problem: I tried to store credentials for notarizing. Presumably with the wrong combination of entries (similar to signing) – using the name of my university instead of my Apple Account. xcrun notarytool store-credentials "notarytool-password" --apple-id "Berliner Hochschule fuer Technik" --team-id "8YAW3HL2QP" --password "my Apple-Account-pw" .. retried assuming a syntax error (like missing "). Got the error message: This process stores your credentials securely in the Keychain. You reference these credentials later using a profile name. Validating your credentials... `Error: HTTP status code: 401. Your Apple ID has been locked. Visit iForgot to reset your account (https://iforgot.apple.com), then generate a new app-specific password. Ensure that all authentication arguments are correct.` Happy to see: Signing is not affected and I still an can log in to my account on developer.apple.com. So notarizing “only” seems to be affected. But how to reset the account to resolve the issue? The iforgot.apple.com link does not help - I provided my iPhone-number but did not receive further messages – neither on the iPhone nor on my “developer” macbook. Many thanks in advance All the best Florian

Hi guys, I got an error about mac notarization result return 132. here is the stack trace on the logs: 2025-02-25 02:53:55,503 ERROR [org.ecl.cbi.ws.mac.not.xcr.not.NotarytoolNotarizer] (macos-notarization-service-pool-thread-13) Error while parsing the output after the upload of '/tmp/macos-notarization-service/pending-files/myapplication.dmg' to the Apple notarization service: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 1; Premature end of file. at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:204) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:178) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:400) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:327) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1465) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl$PrologDriver.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:1013) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:542) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:889) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:825) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:141) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1224) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:637) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:326) at java.xml/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:197) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.PListDict.fromXML(PListDict.java:134) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.notarytool.NotarytoolNotarizer.analyzeSubmissionResult(NotarytoolNotarizer.java:39) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.NotarizationTool.upload(NotarizationTool.java:50) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.lambda$uploadFailsafe$3(Notarizer.java:65) at net.jodah.failsafe.Functions.lambda$get$0(Functions.java:48) at net.jodah.failsafe.RetryPolicyExecutor.lambda$supply$0(RetryPolicyExecutor.java:66) at net.jodah.failsafe.Execution.executeSync(Execution.java:128) at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.call(FailsafeExecutor.java:379) at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.get(FailsafeExecutor.java:68) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.uploadFailsafe(Notarizer.java:65) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.NotarizationService.lambda$notarize$0(NotarizationService.java:192) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840) Do you know why? If you have any thread or documents telling about the details of return values of the command: 'xcrun notarytool submit'

All libraries are getting rejected with errors like: not valid for use in process: mapping process and mapped file (non-platform) have different Team IDs

Hi the best community! When I try to submit the app to Testflight I receive the following error: "codesign command failed (/var/folders/j9/yh_rkh114rbgvmglf4gycj8w0000gn/T/XcodeDistPipeline.~~~OW0Dwk/Root/Payload/Application.app/Frameworks/Alamofire.framework: replacing existing signature /var/folders/j9/yh_rkh114rbgvmglf4gycj8w0000gn/T/XcodeDistPipeline.~~~OW0Dwk/Root/Payload/Application.app/Frameworks/Alamofire.framework: invalid or corrupted code requirement(s) Requirement syntax error(s): line 1:155: unexpected token: NPH )" I have never stuck with this issue before. Xcode Version 16.0 I assume that there is something related to code signing and our company name in App Store connect: Medical Institution “NPH” (The company name has been anonymized for privacy purposes.) Appreciate any help. Thank you!

I am having the most difficult time trying to figure out the process for just getting my development .p12 figured out. Full disclosure, being a windows user does not make my life any easier. Seems fairly straightforward on a mac (which I do not have) So I thought I would come here and see if I could collect information on getting working certs and keys on windows pc. Here's what I have so far: -OpenSSL -openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout private_key.key -out cer_sign_request.csr Generates a key and a sign request. went to dev portal submit CSR --> recieved CER -back to OpenSSL -openssl x509 -in ios_development.cer -inform DER -out ios_development.pem -outform PEM CER-->PEM -openssl pkcs12 -export -inkey keyname.key -in ios_development.pem -out ios_development.p12 -"No cert in -in file 'ios_development.pem' matches private key" so here I am. Lost. Mind you I've tried the process in a few different ways and now I am on a mission to find my "private_key" somehow with no way to access keychain. I dunno feels convuluted. for good reason I am sure. If anyone has a streamlined version of how to get this done I will be forever indebted to you. Your time is greatly appreciated. for futher context I am just trying to get an eas build on my phone from expo. Thankyou!

Hi, I had an issue when I notarized myapplication.dmg with Process 'xcrun notarytool submit' exited with value '132'. Do you know how to solve it? Do you have any explanation about the response value when we execute 'xcrun notarytool submit'? Thank you very much! 2025-02-25 09:36:18,182 ERROR [org.ecl.cbi.ws.mac.not.xcr.not.NotarytoolNotarizer] (macos-notarization-service-pool-thread-14) Error while parsing the output after the upload of '/tmp/macos-notarization-service/pending-files/myapplication.dmg' to the Apple notarization service: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1; columnNumber: 1; Premature end of file. at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:204) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.fatalError(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:178) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:400) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:327) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLScanner.reportFatalError(XMLScanner.java:1465) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl$PrologDriver.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:1013) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentScannerImpl.next(XMLDocumentScannerImpl.java:605) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument(XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.java:542) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:889) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse(XML11Configuration.java:825) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:141) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(AbstractSAXParser.java:1224) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:637) at java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:326) at java.xml/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(SAXParser.java:197) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.PListDict.fromXML(PListDict.java:134) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.notarytool.NotarytoolNotarizer.analyzeSubmissionResult(NotarytoolNotarizer.java:39) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.NotarizationTool.upload(NotarizationTool.java:50) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.lambda$uploadFailsafe$3(Notarizer.java:65) at net.jodah.failsafe.Functions.lambda$get$0(Functions.java:48) at net.jodah.failsafe.RetryPolicyExecutor.lambda$supply$0(RetryPolicyExecutor.java:66) at net.jodah.failsafe.Execution.executeSync(Execution.java:128) at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.call(FailsafeExecutor.java:379) at net.jodah.failsafe.FailsafeExecutor.get(FailsafeExecutor.java:68) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.xcrun.common.Notarizer.uploadFailsafe(Notarizer.java:65) at org.eclipse.cbi.ws.macos.notarization.NotarizationService.lambda$notarize$0(NotarizationService.java:192) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:304) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)

The Codesign command adds extended attributes to files that previously had no extended attributes. In my case codesign add following extended attributes to text file in Frrameworks folder: com.apple.cs.CodeDirectory com.apple.cs.CodeRequirements com.apple.cs.CodeRequirements-1 com.apple.cs.CodeSignature Can I somehow prevent this behavior? Thank you.

We have a rather complex network of dependencies for our application stack and, from it, we create multiple unique executables that are placed into the Contents/MacOS directory of our bundle. MyApp.app `- Contents/ `- Frameworks/... `- MacOS/ `- exec_a `- exec_b `- Resources/... Both executables require the same dependencies (and use the same shared .dylib files built as targets in the same project) so it makes sense for them to be in the same place rather than in their own .app folder as I understand it. Qt Libs -> core_lib.dylib -> gui_lib.dylib -> exec_a `-> exec_b etc. We've confirmed build artifacts are correct and the rpath/dependencies are all clean. When in development, all executables run as expected and we can command exec_a (the executable we're listing in the primary Info.plist) to launch exec_b at any time. Once the bundle is signed, however, we cannot get exec_b to launch in any capacity. Even lldb dies right away because it can't attach to anything. We assume this is something in the gatekeeper area of blocking these additional executables. We get the following when trying to run those additional exes in any way: Trace/BPT trap: 5 We're using macdeployqt to finalize the bundle and bring in the correct packages - perhaps something it's doing is causing the additional executables to fail or we're missing an entitlement. We've submitted the app to TestFlights successfully even with these invalid executables to see if there was something the processing of the app would find but so far nothing. We've seen other example of applications with multiple executables in the same MacOS directory and are wondering what the difference is. Any hints or guidance would be great. Thank you!

I have some questions regarding App Group Id's and use of the FileManager during an Appstore iOS transfer. I've read a lot of the topics here that cover app groups and iOS, but it's still unclear exactly what is going to happen during transfer when we try to release an updated version of the app from the new account. We're using this method FileManager.default.containerURL(forSecurityApplicationGroupIdentifier: "group.com.foo.bar") to store files on the device that are important for app launch and user experience. Once we transfer the app and begin the process of creating a new version under the new account will we be able to read the files that are stored using this app group id under the new account? What steps do we need to take in order to handle this and continue being able to access these files? It seems like the app group is not transferred in the process? I've seen some users mention they removed the app group from the original account and created it again under the receiving account (with notes mentioning this is undocumented behavior). These conversations we're centered around Shared user defaults, and that applies as well but I'm more concerned with reading the values from the file system. Thanks!