Hi, I found In-App purchase feature is restricted even with User-based VPP. I understand Device-based VPP does not accept In-App purchase, however User-based VPP accept In-App purchase. (It works on iOS 15 device actually.) When I tried subscribe ChatGPT on iOS 26 device using User-based VPP, an error dialog is shown that explains In-App purchase is not allowed. sysdiagnose shows logs belog: 情報 2025-10-26 23:58:22.350841 -0700 storekitd [Client] (ChatGPT) Initializing client デフォルト 2025-10-26 23:58:22.353982 -0700 storekitd [Client] (ChatGPT) Initialized with server Production bundle ID com.openai.chat and request bundle ID com.openai.chat] デフォルト 2025-10-26 23:58:22.354020 -0700 storekitd [CanMakePayments] In-app purchase disabled because app com.openai.chat has MID based SINF In iOS 15 device, no storekitd logs are found and appstored and several processes seem to handle In-App purchase. Does In-App purchase no longer work with User-based VPP? Thank you.

Hello Apple Developer Community, I am implementing the "Return to Service" feature with app preservation in our MDM solution (iOS 26+). My goal is to use the EraseDeviceCommand to securely erase user data while preserving managed apps, and then have the device automatically re-enroll without user interaction. What I am doing: The device is supervised and successfully enrolled in Automated Device Enrollment (ADE). The device has generated and escrowed a bootstrap token to our MDM server (SetBootstrapToken received). I am sending the EraseDeviceCommand to the device via MDM with the necessary parameters for Return to Service with app preservation. The command payload includes: Enabled: true The previously escrowed BootstrapToken (as Base64 data). WiFiProfileData (as Base64 data) to ensure connectivity post-erase. Example Payload Structure (Simplified): <key>ReturnToService</key> <dict> <key>Enabled</key> <true/> <key>BootstrapToken</key> <data>YOUR_BASE64_TOKEN</data> <key>WiFiProfileData</key> <data>YOUR_BASE64_WIFI_PROFILE</data> </dict> The observed behavior: The erase command is successful. The device performs the secure user data erase. Crucially, the managed applications are preserved and automatically installed again after the reboot (confirming app preservation is working). The device connects to the Wi-Fi network successfully. The issue: I am not seeing the GetBootstrapToken request from the device hit our MDM server's check-in URL during the post-erase setup assistant phase. The re-enrollment seems to complete, but this specific request is missing from our server logs. My questions: Is the GetBootstrapToken request an explicit check-in message type, or is it an implicit part of the general CheckIn process during ADE re-enrollment when the token is used? If the device successfully re-enrolls and preserves apps, is the explicit GetBootstrapToken request still expected? Or does the token included in the EraseDeviceCommand payload satisfy all authentication needs for this workflow? What specific conditions or capabilities on the MDM server side might prevent the device from sending this specific request, even if the overall process succeeds? Any insights from Apple engineers or other developers who have successfully implemented this flow would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Hi, We're having problems starting an Ad Hoc ipa on an iPad with iOS 12.7.7 and 12.7.8. The iPad's UUID has been added to the provisioning profile. The iPad that we are trying to start the app on is online, so Apple's certificate validation server should be reachable. We don't have any problems with iOS versions above iOS 12. The .ipa was built using the latest version of Xcode (26.2, build 17C52). Here is the anonymised and reduced console log (only the app launch / bootstrap part): default 07:29:35.683108+0100 SpringBoard Icon touch began: <private> default 07:29:35.752640+0100 SpringBoard Icon tapped: <private> default 07:29:35.768538+0100 trustd cert[0]: SubjectCommonName =(leaf)[]> 0 default 07:29:35.791500+0100 SpringBoard Trust evaluate failure: [leaf IssuerCommonName LeafMarkerOid SubjectCommonName] default 07:29:35.793654+0100 trustd cert[0]: IssuerCommonName =(path)[]> 0 default 07:29:36.043497+0100 assertiond Submitting new job for "<APP_BUNDLE_ID>" on behalf of SpringBoard (pid: 48) default 07:29:36.044393+0100 SpringBoard Bootstrapping <APP_BUNDLE_ID> with intent foreground-interactive error 07:29:36.045124+0100 SpringBoard [<APP_BUNDLE_ID>] Bootstrap failed with error: domain: BKSProcessErrorDomain, code: 1 (bootstrap-failed), reason: "Failed to start job" error 07:29:36.045214+0100 SpringBoard Bootstrapping failed for <APP_BUNDLE_ID> (pid: -1): Error Domain=BKSProcessErrorDomain Code=1 "Unable to bootstrap process with bundleID <APP_BUNDLE_ID>" NSLocalizedFailureReason=Failed to start job NSUnderlyingError=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=3 "No such process" BKLaunchdOperation=launch_get_running_pid_4SB BKLaunchdJobLabel=<LAUNCHD_JOB_LABEL> BKSProcessJobLabel=<LAUNCHD_JOB_LABEL> default 07:29:36.046078+0100 assertiond Submitted job with label: <LAUNCHD_JOB_LABEL> default 07:29:36.046442+0100 assertiond Unable to get pid for '<LAUNCHD_JOB_LABEL>': No such process (3) error 07:29:36.046542+0100 assertiond Failed to start job: NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=3 "No such process" default 07:29:36.046607+0100 assertiond Deleted job with label: <LAUNCHD_JOB_LABEL> default 07:29:36.081068+0100 SpringBoard Application process state changed for <APP_BUNDLE_ID>: pid: -1; taskState: Not Running

Hi everyone, I submitted this feature request through Apple’s Feedback Assistant and wanted to share it here, because many families run into the same issue and Apple prioritizes features based on the number of reports they receive. Current limitation: Screen Time only allows one single Downtime period per day for child accounts. For families with separate school hours and bedtime, this is very impractical. My real-world use case: • Downtime 1: 08:00–13:00 (school) • Downtime 2: 20:00–06:00 (bedtime) Both serve completely different purposes, but are not possible to combine with the current system. My suggestions to Apple: Support multiple Downtime periods per day for child accounts. Allow custom exceptions per Downtime block (e.g., allow Phone app). Provide more flexibility overall for families using Screen Time. If you would benefit from this too, it would be great if you could submit the same request via the Feedback app – the more reports Apple receives, the higher the chance for implementation. My Feedback ID: FB21265678 Thank you! 🙏 Hallo zusammen, ich habe über die Feedback-App einen Vorschlag an Apple eingereicht und wollte ihn hier teilen, weil viele Familien dasselbe Problem haben und Apple mehr Rückmeldungen braucht, um das Thema zu priorisieren. Aktuelles Problem: In Bildschirmzeit kann für Kinder aktuell nur eine einzige Auszeit pro Tag eingerichtet werden. Für Familien mit getrennten Schul- und Schlafenszeiten ist das extrem unpraktisch. Mein Anwendungsfall: • Auszeit 1: 08:00–13:00 (Schule) • Auszeit 2: 20:00–06:00 (Schlafenszeit) Beides erfüllt unterschiedliche Zwecke, ist aber nicht kombinierbar. Mein Vorschlag an Apple: Mehrere Auszeiten pro Tag für Kinderaccounts. Pro Auszeit eigene Ausnahmen festlegen (z. B. Telefon erlauben). Allgemein mehr Flexibilität im Screen-Time-System für Familien. Wenn ihr das ebenfalls hilfreich findet, wäre es super, wenn ihr es auch über die Feedback-App meldet – je mehr, desto besser. Feedback-ID meines Vorschlags: FB21265678 Danke euch! 🙏

Hello everyone, I recently changed the phone number associated with my Apple ID (about 4 days ago), but I’m still receiving the two-factor authentication verification codes on my old number instead of the new one. Has anyone experienced this? Is there a delay on Apple’s side, or is there something else I need to do to complete the update?

Hello, this may not be the correct place to ask this question so I apologize in advance if this is the case. We are currently having some issues when attempting to restore device back ups via iCloud that where previously enrolled to our MDM solution, as upon the restore no app data seems to be persisted over (we have tested restoring the backup on the same device and we have been able to have data persist between wipes) On the initial device we have ensured that the restrictions allowCloudKeychainSync allowManagedAppsCloudSync are set to true, and can see that the initial devices back up has the app data backed up, yet despite this data is not persisted when restoring from back up on a new device. On the device where the back up was initially done when restoring the applications are applied but indicated that they must be re-installed via our management console, once the app has been uninstalled and reinstalled the old data does show up, when applied to the new device our mdm solution pushes down the app.managed config but the device treats it as a new install. Could this possibly be due to us using Device Licensing when assigning apps? Or is it due to the intial device only performing a token update request when restoring and the new device going through the entire checkin proccess? Both devices are provisioned via DEP, and applications where assigned initially via VPP Any insight on this would be useful (For reference this is an MDM solution of our own making so we are attempting to sus out if there is a configuration issue we could be overlooking).

How to test ManagedAppConfigurationProvider without MDM ? Task { /* Configuration provider task */ for await configuration in configurationProvider.configurations(MyAppConfiguration.self) { self.configuration = configuration ?? MyAppConfiguration.defaultConfiguration } } Can the existence of a configuration be simulated, e.g. by storing a mocked configuration in UserDefaults? The UserDefaults key "com.apple.configuration.managed" seems not relevant here.

m personal iPhone is managed by an Unauthorized and Unknown mdm management team, The profile isn’t showing up in VPN Settings and I can’t remove them from having Remote access and control over my Personal Device! I’ve SPENT MANY MONTHS TRYING TO GET SUPPORT VIA EMAILING APPLE DEVELOPER AND SPEAKING TO APPLE SUPPORT WHICH HAS BEEN EXTREMELY EXHAUSTING AND HUMILIATIN! I’ve resorted to contacting Internet crime websit, the federal trade commissio, Better business bureau and Consumer Affairs to file an online complaint against Apple for not complying with their Security and Privacy policy for consumers accounts! Because of this unauthorized and unknown mdm device management profile I don’t have COMPLETE CONTROL OVER MY OWN IPHONE! ! Unable to find a team with the given Team II 'L95TAW5KWP' to which you belong. Pleas Developer Program Support. https://developer.apple.com/support I contacted developer support via email and also tried calling but they don’t respond!

Issue Using the DeviceInformationCommand API, the following device information can no longer be retrieved on iOS/iPadOS 26 and later. IMEI ICCID PhoneNumber This issue does not occur on devices running iOS/iPadOS 18.x or earlier. We would appreciate it if you could advise us on a solution to enable the retrieval of this information. Request XML <?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"> <plist version=\"1.0\"> <dict> <key>CommandUUID</key> <string><!-- Here is CommandUUID --></string> <key>Command</key> <dict> <key>RequestType</key> <string>DeviceInformation</string> <key>Queries</key> <array> <string>IMEI</string> <string>ICCID</string> <string>PhoneNumber</string> </array> </dict> </dict> </plist>

Hello world! First post here. Developing my first app. It primarily targets supervised and MDM managed devices. A few questions: For supervised devices, is serial number available? I want to get the number and use it for app auto activation Is MDM required for supervised devices? Or, as long as a device is enrolled through Apple Business Manager? Which capacity shall I request for the app? Thanks so much!

I am a developer working on iOS apps. I would like to report an issue occurring in iOS 26 beta 2. Our company has Enterprise account, and we are developing apps. When we distribute these apps, and install them on a device running iOS 26 beta2, apps install successfully, but apps crashed immediately after being launched. MDM Install Application When I install the app via Xcode and trust it, apps will run. Launchd job spawn failed This issue does not occur on versions prior to iOS 26. I would like to know if this is a problem that will be resolved in future updates, or if it is a policy change.

Background / Objective We are currently developing a solution to centrally manage Apple OS updates (major and minor) across managed macOS devices. Before implementing at scale, we need Apple’s guidance on supported and future-proof update mechanisms under MDM. Questions / Ask (Apple Guidance Requested) Apple recommended method What is Apple’s recommended approach to perform: Minor updates (e.g., macOS X.Y → X.Z) Major upgrades (e.g., Ventura → Sonoma) in an enterprise fleet? Support boundary Is macOS update management only supported via MDM (including any newer declarative workflows), or are local mechanisms (installer + command-line tooling) also considered supported for enterprise automation? Use of startosinstall Can we leverage the existing utility: /Applications/Install macOS .app/Contents/Resources/startosinstall for automated upgrades in enterprise environments? If yes, are there recommended flags/workflows Apple endorses for unattended or minimally interactive upgrades? Long-term support / stability Does startosinstall have any form of long-term support / stability guarantees across future macOS releases? Are there any known deprecations planned (or guidance that customers should transition to MDM/DDM workflows)? MDM interaction / interference When using startosinstall, can MDM policies (software update deferrals/restrictions, update enforcement, etc.) interfere with or block the upgrade? If interference is expected, what is the correct supported way to coordinate: MDM software update settings local startosinstall execution to avoid failures and ensure compliance? What We Need From Apple (Desired Outcome) A clear statement of recommended and supported update workflow(s) for enterprise managed macOS: for minor updates for major upgrades Guidance on whether startosinstall is acceptable for long-term automation, or whether we should only use MDM/DDM-driven workflows. Any best practices or reference documentation Apple recommends for implementing this safely and reliably.

Hey folks, I work as a software development consultant. We develop enterprise applications for our clients, and the apps we create are usually for internal use. We've ran into a bit of a conundrum with a client who doesn't have their own Apple Enterprise account, and neither do we as we don't meet the criteria, but they're wanting to distribute an application we've built for them via their own MDM software. We are not entirely sure how to provide them with a distribution ready .ipa file that isn't AdHoc and will be recognized as a secure app. We've looked into generating a Developer ID provisioning profile and accompanying cert, however we're running into a problem where the platform of our app (iOS) doesn't match the platform required by the Developer ID profile (macOS). I've also come across the idea of resigning an .ipa, but again, the client doesn't have a Apple Developer account and expects the working .ipa to be included in the service rendered. Any suggestions or advice or documentation around the subject would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Ale

Hello ! Currently, we have customers who use about 5,000 devices. In the case of ios26, the phone number is not acquired overall, and 18.x, 17.x, and 16.x are all acquired in half and not acquired in half. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/deviceinformationcommand/command-data.dictionary/queries-data.dictionary It seems that it is the right behavior not to acquire it on the specification sheet. However, I wonder when it became impossible to acquire. (There are devices that can be acquired and devices that can't be acquired in the same os version.) Will the devices that are being acquired be blocked someday? When it was developed in 2019, it was in a state that could be acquired in full. I would also like to ask if there is an alternative way to get your phone number. Thank you.

Hi, We're having problems starting an Ad Hoc ipa on an iPad with iOS 12.7.7 and 12.7.8, probably iOS 12 in general. The iPad's UUID is added to the certificate. And we don't have problems with iOS versions > iOS 12. Here is the anonymized Console Log: default 09:05:12.088994+0100 SpringBoard immediate edge swipe: failed default 09:05:12.095189+0100 SpringBoard Icon touch began: <private> default 09:05:12.096204+0100 SpringBoard Found a reasonable launch image for <private>, not pre-warming SplashBoard. Load image into the snapshot instance. default 09:05:12.117737+0100 powerd Activity changes from 0x2 to 0x1. UseActiveState:1 default 09:05:12.118572+0100 powerd hidActive:1 displayOff:0 assertionActivityValid:0 now:0xcb6 hid_ts:0xcb6 assertion_ts:0x0 default 09:05:12.145354+0100 backboardd [HID] [MT] dispatchEvent Dispatching event with 1 children, _eventMask=0x23 _childEventMask=0x3 Cancel=0 Touching=0 inRange=0 default 09:05:12.152820+0100 SpringBoard Icon tapped: <private> default 09:05:12.158236+0100 dasd Trigger: <private> is now [1] default 09:05:12.159538+0100 dasd Don't have <private> for type 1 default 09:05:12.170128+0100 trustd cert[0]: SubjectCommonName =(leaf)[]> 0 default 09:05:12.170407+0100 trustd cert[0]: LeafMarkerOid =(leaf)[]> 0 default 09:05:12.182388+0100 trustd OCSPSingleResponse: nextUpdate 0.54 days ago default 09:05:12.186084+0100 trustd OCSPSingleResponse: nextUpdate 0.62 days ago default 09:05:12.187067+0100 SpringBoard Trust evaluate failure: [leaf IssuerCommonName LeafMarkerOid SubjectCommonName] default 09:05:12.238604+0100 trustd Task <TASK_UUID_REDACTED_1>.<1> resuming, QOS(0x19) default 09:05:12.240650+0100 trustd TIC TCP Conn Start [12:0xADDR_REDACTED] default 09:05:12.241136+0100 trustd [C12 Hostname#HASH_REDACTED:80 tcp, pid: PID_REDACTED, url hash: HASH_REDACTED] start default 09:05:12.245884+0100 trustd TIC TCP Conn Start [13:0xADDR_REDACTED] default 09:05:12.246361+0100 trustd [C13 Hostname#HASH_REDACTED:80 tcp, pid: PID_REDACTED, url hash: HASH_REDACTED] start default 09:05:12.256520+0100 trustd nw_connection_report_state_with_handler_locked [C12] reporting state failed error Network is down error 09:05:12.256978+0100 trustd TIC TCP Conn Failed [12:0xADDR_REDACTED]: 1:50 Err(50) error 09:05:12.262697+0100 trustd Task <TASK_UUID_REDACTED_1>.<1> HTTP load failed (error code: -1009 [1:50]) error 09:05:12.271646+0100 trustd Task <TASK_UUID_REDACTED_1>.<1> load failed with error Error Domain=NSURLErrorDomain Code=-1009 "The Internet connection appears to be offline." default 09:05:12.271898+0100 trustd Failed to download ocsp response http://ocsp.apple.com/ocsp03-wwdrg311/... with error Error Domain=NSURLErrorDomain Code=-1009 "The Internet connection appears to be offline." default 09:05:12.280643+0100 SpringBoard Activating <private> from icon default 09:05:12.281399+0100 CommCenter #I CTServerConnection from pid PID_REDACTED has closed (conn=0xADDR_REDACTED) default 09:05:12.513629+0100 SpringBoard Bootstrapping com.example.myapp with intent foreground-interactive default 09:05:12.514084+0100 assertiond Submitting new job for "com.example.myapp" on behalf of <BKProcess: 0xADDR_REDACTED; SpringBoard; com.apple.springboard; pid: PID_REDACTED; ...> default 09:05:12.514909+0100 assertiond Submitted job with label: UIKitApplication:com.example.myapp[REDACTED][REDACTED] error 09:05:12.516769+0100 SpringBoard [com.example.myapp] Bootstrap failed with error: <NSError: 0xADDR_REDACTED; domain: BKSProcessErrorDomain; code: 1 (bootstrap-failed); reason: "Failed to start job"> error 09:05:12.516935+0100 SpringBoard Bootstrapping failed for <FBApplicationProcess: 0xADDR_REDACTED; com.example.myapp; pid: -1> with error: Error Domain=BKSProcessErrorDomain Code=1 "Unable to bootstrap process with bundleID com.example.myapp" default 09:05:12.517589+0100 SpringBoard <FBApplicationProcess: 0xADDR_REDACTED; com.example.myapp; pid: -1> exited. default 09:05:12.542638+0100 SpringBoard Application process state changed for com.example.myapp: <SBApplicationProcessState: 0xADDR_REDACTED; pid: -1; taskState: Not Running; visibility: Unknown> default 09:05:13.072994+0100 SpringBoard Front display did change: <SBApplication: 0xADDR_REDACTED; com.example.myapp> Is there any know problem with running Ad Hoc ipas on iOS 12? Thanks Christian

We are having issues working with bypass codes the server creates when initiating Activation Lock through MDM. We are able to use the device-generated bypass codes without issue. When using the end point to request activation lock as specified in https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/creating-and-using-bypass-codes/ we get a 200 response. But when using the endpoint to bypass the activation lock, we get a 404 response. If we try to manually input the activation lock bypass code, it also does not work. Both of these methods work with the device-generated bypass codes. Just to clarify when testing the server generated codes, we ensured that we did not test the device-generated codes. All of this was tested on iOS devices. Created feedback ticket FB21365819 with device specific details.

Hi, My client has already developed an ios app and they need an enterprise account to publish the app. What are the procedures to create enterprise account?

I found a new Payload attribute LegacyAppConfigAssetReference in AppManaged introduced in iOs 18.4 beta. So I tried it, however no configuration is discoverted in the installed app. -- configuration { "Identifier": "8c2af0b6-5ae0-5927-a1cd-bab5e4148bb8", "Type": "com.apple.configuration.app.managed", "Payload": { "InstallBehavior": { "Install": "Required", "License": { "Assignment": "Device", "VPPType": "Device" } }, "AppStoreID": "535886823", "LegacyAppConfigAssetReference": "ac35558f-aefc-5faf-8f64-1faaff993b96" }, "ServerToken": "2abdc89492d89ca1a213ca61318ae0651c2b8de660c2847a44a3fb8ad9d9a8ad" } -- declaration/asset/ac35558f-aefc-5faf-8f64-1faaff993b96 { "Identifier": "ac35558f-aefc-5faf-8f64-1faaff993b96", "Type": "com.apple.asset.data", "Payload": { "Reference": { "DataURL": "https://i3-oreore-ios-mdm.azurewebsites.net/asset_files/eyJpZCI6IjNkOTg2YWVjNzQ1MWJiYWZlZjJmZGU1NmZmYmJlYjdkLnBsaXN0Iiwic3RvcmFnZSI6InN0b3JlIiwibWV0YWRhdGEiOnsiZmlsZW5hbWUiOiJFbmNvZGVkQ2hyb21lUG9saWN5RXhhbXBsZS5wbGlzdCIsInNpemUiOjMyMjUsIm1pbWVfdHlwZSI6ImFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL29jdGV0LXN0cmVhbSJ9fQ", "ContentType": "application/plist" } }, "ServerToken": "7433f7c0c991a1943636ff7bd8949e88738c684ecbde347ac8a9c5b5c19dda14" } -- And the data type of the managed app configuration is application/plist http https://i3-oreore-ios-mdm.azurewebsites.net/asset_files/eyJpZCI6IjNkOTg2YWVjNzQ1MWJiYWZlZjJmZGU1NmZmYmJlYjdkLnBsaXN0Iiwic3RvcmFnZSI6InN0b3JlIiwibWV0YWRhdGEiOnsiZmlsZW5hbWUiOiJFbmNvZGVkQ2hyb21lUG9saWN5RXhhbXBsZS5wbGlzdCIsInNpemUiOjMyMjUsIm1pbWVfdHlwZSI6ImFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL29jdGV0LXN0cmVhbSJ9fQ HTTP/1.1 200 OK Accept-Ranges: bytes Cache-Control: max-age=31536000 Content-Length: 3225 Content-Type: application/plist Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 22:59:40 GMT X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC '-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN' 'http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd'> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>EncodedChromePolicy</key> <string>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</string> </dict> </plist> Please note that this example plist is the same content as is described here: https://www.chromium.org/administrators/ios-mdm-policy-format/ After applying the declaration, the app GoogleChrome is successfully installed but no managed app configuration seems applied. MDMAppManagement.plist in the sysdiagnose is like below: plutil -p logs/MCState/Shared/MDMAppManagement.plist { "metadataByBundleID" => { "com.google.chrome.ios" => { "Attributes" => { "Removable" => 0 } "flags" => 1 "source" => "Declarative Device Management" "state" => 7 } "com.microsoft.skype.teams" => { "Attributes" => { "Removable" => 0 } "flags" => 1 "source" => "Declarative Device Management" "state" => 7 } } } I also tried with our private apps and not applied... How can we use this feature or check the configuration is applied? Thank you,

Details: Device: iPhone 12 Pro Max System: iOS 26.1 beta 2 Issue Description: When testing MDM device restriction capabilities on iOS 26.1 beta 2, I found that the allowCamera restriction does not work as expected. Observed Behavior: • On a BYOD device: When allowCamera is set to false, the Camera and FaceTime apps disappear from the Home Screen, as expected. However, third-party apps (such as WeChat) can still access the camera and take photos. • On earlier versions (e.g. iOS 26.0.1): Setting allowCamera to false correctly blocks all apps, including third-party apps, from accessing the camera. Initially, I assumed Apple might have changed this restriction behavior so that allowCamera only applies to supervised devices. However, after testing on supervised devices, I found that even there, when allowCamera is set to false, the Camera and FaceTime apps are hidden, but third-party apps can still use the camera. This indicates that the restriction is not functioning correctly in iOS 26.1 beta 2. Expectation: When allowCamera is set to false, all camera access — including third-party apps — should be blocked. Request: Could someone from Apple’s development or MDM team confirm whether this is an expected behavior change or a potential bug in iOS 26.1 beta 2?

Recently, we have encountered some users who have been unable to open the enterprise signature application after upgrading to version 18.3.2, without an IPS file. Through system logs, we found that signature verification has occurred SecKeyVerifySignature failed: Error Domain=NSOSStatusErrorDomain Code=-50 "rsa_pub_crypt failed, ccerr=-7" UserInfo={numberOfErrorsDeep=0, NSDescription=rsa_pub_crypt failed, ccerr=-7} Waiting for the information, I will provide the obtained system logs below. The application package name that crashed is com. mobile. moa aa.txt new