I'm testing CloudKit Sharing (CKShare) in my app. My app uses CloudKit Sharing to share private data between users (this is not App Store Family Sharing or purchase sharing, it's app-level sharing via CKShare). To properly test this, I need three or four Apple Accounts with distinct roles in my app. This means I need three/four separate iCloud accounts signed in on test devices. Simulators are probably ok: two acting as "parents" (share owner and participant): parent1.sandbox@example.com parent2.sandbox@example.com, one or two as a "child" (participant) child1.sandbox@example.com child2.sandbox@example.com except obviously using my domain name. I attempted to create Sandbox Apple Accounts in App Store Connect, but these don't appear to work with CloudKit Sharing. I then created several standard Apple Accounts, but I've now hit a limit — I believe my mobile number (used for two-factor authentication on the test accounts) has been flagged or rate-limited for account creation, and I can no longer create or verify new accounts with it. It's also blocked the email addresses associated with those accounts from being used for new account creation. Can Apple or anyone advise on the recommended approach for testing CloudKit Sharing with multiple participants? are Sandbox accounts supposed to work for CKShare, or do I need full Apple Accounts? How do i create and verify these in the correct way to avoid hitting these limits or breaking terms of service?

I'm experiencing the following error with my SwiftData container when running a build: Code=134504 "Cannot use staged migration with an unknown model version." Code Structure - Summary I am using a versionedSchema to store multiple models in SwiftData. I started experiencing this issue when adding two new models in the newest Schema version. Starting from the current public version, V4.4.6, there are two migrations. Migration Summary The first migration is to V4.4.7. This is a lightweight migration removing one attribute from one of the models. This was tested and worked successfully. The second migration is to V5.0.0. This is a custom migration adding two new models, and instantiating instances of the two new models based on data from instances of the existing models. In the initial testing of this version, no issues were observed. Issue and Steps to Reproduce Reproduction of issue: Starting from a fresh build of the publicly released V4.4.6, I run a new build that contains both Schema Versions (V4.4.7 and V5.0.0), and their associated migration stages. This builds successfully, and the container successfully migrates to V5.0.0. Checking the default.store file, all values appear to migrate and instantiate correctly. The second step in reproduction of the issue is to simply stop running the build, and then rebuild, without any code changes. This fails to initialize the model container every time afterwards. Going back to the simulator after successive builds are stopped in Xcode, the app launches and accesses/modifies the model container as normal. Supplementary Issue: I have been putting up with the same, persistent issue in the Xcode Preview Canvas of "Failed to Initialize Model Container" This is a 5 in 6 build issue, where builds will work at random. In the case of previews, I have cleared all data associated with all previews multiple times. The only difference being that the simulator is a 100% failure rate after the initial, successful initialization. I assume this is due to the different build structure of previews. Lastly, of note, the Xcode previews fail at the same line in instantiating the model container as the simulator does. From my research into this issue, people say that the Xcode preview is instantiating from elsewhere. I do have a separate model container set up specifically for canvas previews, but the error does not occur in that container, but rather the app's main container. Possible Contributing Factors & Tested Facts iOS: While I have experienced issues with SwiftData and the complier in iOS 26, I can rule that out as the issue here. This has been tested on simulators running iOS 18.6, 26.0.1, and 26.1, all encountering failures to initialize model container. While in iOS 18, subsequent builds after the successful migration did work, I did eventually encounter the same error and crash. In iOS 26.0.1 and 26.1, these errors come immediately on the second build. Container Initialization for V4.4.6 do { container = try ModelContainer( for: Job.self, JobTask.self, Day.self, Charge.self, Material.self, Person.self, TaskCategory.self, Service.self, migrationPlan: JobifyMigrationPlan.self ) } catch { fatalError("Failed to Initialize Model Container") } Versioned Schema Instance for V4.4.6 (V4.4.7 differs only by versionIdentifier) static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(4, 4, 6) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Job.self, JobTask.self, Day.self, Charge.self, Material.self, Person.self, TaskCategory.self, Service.self] } Container Initialization for V5.0.0 do { let schema = Schema([Jobify.self, JobTask.self, Day.self, Charge.self, MaterialItem.self, Person.self, TaskCategory.self, Service.self, ServiceJob.self, RecurerRule.self]) container = try ModelContainer( for: schema, migrationPlan: JobifyMigrationPlan.self ) } catch { fatalError("Failed to Initialize Model Container") } Versioned Schema Instance for V5.0.0 static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(5, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [ JobifySchemaV500.Job.self, JobifySchemaV500.JobTask.self, JobifySchemaV500.Day.self, JobifySchemaV500.Charge.self, JobifySchemaV500.Material.self, JobifySchemaV500.Person.self, JobifySchemaV500.TaskCategory.self, JobifySchemaV500.Service.self, JobifySchemaV500.ServiceJob.self, JobifySchemaV500.RecurerRule.self ] } Addressing Differences in Object Names Type-aliasing: All my model types are type-aliased for simplification in view components. All types are aliased as 'JobifySchemeV446.<#Name#>' in V.4.4.6, and 'JobifySchemaV500.<#Name#>' in V5.0.0 Issues with iOS 26: My type-aliases dating back to iOS 17 overlapped with lower level objects in Swift, including 'Job' and 'Material'. These started to be an issue with initializing the model container when running in iOS 26. The type aliases have been renamed since, however the V4.4.6 build with the old names runs and builds perfectly fine in iOS 26 If there is any other code that may be relevant in determining where this error is occurring, I would be happy to add it. My current best theory is simply that I have mistakenly omitted code relevant to the SwiftData Migration.

I’m seeing an issue with CloudKit sharing in iOS 26.2.1: When I call CKShare(rootRecord:) with a brand-new record in a fresh custom zone, the share is created with no root attached (rootFromShare == nil). After saving both the root and share in a single CKModifyRecordsOperation, fetching the share from the server still shows no root reference (rootRecordID == nil). No errors are thrown, but sharing simply fails. Key facts: • Custom zone created and confirmed (sharing enabled, capsRaw=7/15) • Brand-new record type and fresh IDs each run • Never reusing records or shares • Saving both root and share together in one operation • No default zone usage; always custom private zone Tested: • Multiple devices, iCloud accounts, and app versions • Both simulator and physical device Debug logs consistently show: • SHARE_CREATE_SHARE_LOCAL ... rootFromShare=nil • After save/fetch: rootRecordID=nil on server Has anyone seen this? Is there a new CloudKit regression in iOS 26.x, or am I missing something subtle? Minimal sample project and full debug logs available if needed. Any insights or workarounds would be hugely appreciated!

We're in the process of migrating our app to the Swift 6 language mode. I have hit a road block that I cannot wrap my head around, and it concerns Core Data and how we work with NSManagedObject instances. Greatly simplied, our Core Data stack looks like this: class CoreDataStack { private let persistentContainer: NSPersistentContainer var viewContext: NSManagedObjectContext { persistentContainer.viewContext } } For accessing the database, we provide Controller classes such as e.g. class PersonController { private let coreDataStack: CoreDataStack func fetchPerson(byName name: String) async throws -> Person? { try await coreDataStack.viewContext.perform { let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest<Person>() fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "name == %@", name) return try fetchRequest.execute().first } } } Our view controllers use such controllers to fetch objects and populate their UI with it: class MyViewController: UIViewController { private let chatController: PersonController private let ageLabel: UILabel func populateAgeLabel(name: String) { Task { let person = try? await chatController.fetchPerson(byName: name) ageLabel.text = "\(person?.age ?? 0)" } } } This works very well, and there are no concurrency problems since the managed objects are fetched from the view context and accessed only in the main thread. When turning on Swift 6 language mode, however, the compiler complains about the line calling the controller method: Non-sendable result type 'Person?' cannot be sent from nonisolated context in call to instance method 'fetchPerson(byName:)' Ok, fair enough, NSManagedObject is not Sendable. No biggie, just add @MainActor to the controller method, so it can be called from view controllers which are also main actor. However, now the compiler shows the same error at the controller method calling viewContext.perform: Non-sendable result type 'Person?' cannot be sent from nonisolated context in call to instance method 'perform(schedule:_:)' And now I'm stumped. Does this mean NSManageObject instances cannot even be returned from calls to NSManagedObjectContext.perform? Ever? Even though in this case, @MainActor matches the context's actor isolation (since it's the view context)? Of course, in this simple example the controller method could just return the age directly, and more complex scenarios could return Sendable data structures that are instantiated inside the perform closure. But is that really the only legal solution? That would mean a huge refactoring challenge for our app, since we use NSManageObject instances fetched from the view context everywhere. That's what the view context is for, right? tl;dr: is it possible to return NSManagedObject instances fetched from the view context with Swift 6 strict concurrency enabled, and if so how?

Hi, I'm getting a very odd error log in my SwiftData setup for an iOS app. It is implemented to support schema migration. When starting the app, it simply prints the following log twice (seems to be dependent on how many migration steps, I have two steps in my sample code): CoreData: error: Attempting to retrieve an NSManagedObjectModel version checksum while the model is still editable. This may result in an unstable verison checksum. Add model to NSPersistentStoreCoordinator and try again. (Yes there is a mistyped word "verison", this is exactly the log) The code actually fully works. But I have neither CloudKit configured, nor is this app in Production yet. I'm still just developing. Here is the setup and code to reproduce the issue. Development mac version: macOS 15.5 XCode version: 16.4 iOS Simulator version: 18.5 Real iPhone version: 18.5 Project name: SwiftDataDebugApp SwiftDataDebugApp.swift: import SwiftUI import SwiftData @main struct SwiftDataDebugApp: App { var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { let schema = Schema([ Item.self, ]) let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: false, allowsSave: true) do { return try ModelContainer(for: schema, migrationPlan: ModelMigraitonPlan.self, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } }() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(sharedModelContainer) } } Item.swift: import Foundation import SwiftData typealias Item = ModelSchemaV2_0_0.Item enum ModelSchemaV1_0_0: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } } enum ModelSchemaV2_0_0: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(2, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date var tags: [Tag] = [] init(timestamp: Date, tags: [Tag]) { self.timestamp = timestamp self.tags = tags } } } enum ModelMigraitonPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan { static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [ModelSchemaV1_0_0.self] } static var stages: [MigrationStage] { [migrationV1_0_0toV2_0_0] } static let migrationV1_0_0toV2_0_0 = MigrationStage.custom( fromVersion: ModelSchemaV1_0_0.self, toVersion: ModelSchemaV2_0_0.self, willMigrate: nil, didMigrate: { context in let items = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<ModelSchemaV2_0_0.Item>()) for item in items { item.tags = Array(repeating: "abc", count: Int.random(in: 0...3)).map({ Tag(value: $0) }) } try context.save() } ) } Tag.swift: import Foundation struct Tag: Codable, Hashable, Comparable { var value: String init(value: String) { self.value = value } static func < (lhs: Tag, rhs: Tag) -> Bool { return lhs.value < rhs.value } static func == (lhs: Tag, rhs: Tag) -> Bool { return lhs.value == rhs.value } func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) { hasher.combine(value) } } ContentView.swift: import SwiftUI import SwiftData struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query private var items: [Item] var body: some View { VStack { List { ForEach(items) { item in VStack(alignment: .leading) { Text(item.timestamp, format: Date.FormatStyle(date: .numeric, time: .standard)) HStack { ForEach(item.tags, id: \.hashValue) { tag in Text("\(tag.value)") } } } } .onDelete(perform: deleteItems) } Button("Add") { addItem() } .padding(.top) } } private func addItem() { withAnimation { let newItem = Item(timestamp: Date(), tags: [Tag(value: "Hi")]) modelContext.insert(newItem) } do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Error saving add: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } private func deleteItems(offsets: IndexSet) { withAnimation { for index in offsets { modelContext.delete(items[index]) } } do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Error saving delete: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } } #Preview { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Item.self, inMemory: true) } I hope someone can help, couldn't find anything related to this log at all.

I have transitioned to CKSyncEngine for syncing data to iCloud, and it is working quite well. I have a question regarding best practices for modifying and saving a CKRecord which already exists in the private or shared database. In my current app, most CKRecords will never be modified after saving to the database, so I do not persist a received record locally after updating my local data model. In the rare event that the local data for that record is modified, I manually fetch the associated server record from the database, modify it, and then use CKSyncEngine to save the modified record. As an alternative method, I can create a new CKRecord locally with the corresponding recordID and the modified data, and then use CKSyncEngine to attempt to save that record to the database. Doing so generates an error in the delegate method handleSentRecordZoneChanges, where I receive the local record I tried to save back inevent.failedRecordSaves with a .serverRecordChanged error, along with the corresponding server CKRecord. I can then update that server record with the local data and re-save using CKSyncEngine. I have not yet seen any issues when doing it this way. The advantage of the latter method is that CKSyncEngine handles the entire database operation, eliminating the manual fetch step. My question is: is this an acceptable practice, or could this result in other unforeseen issues?

In the CloudKit logs I see logs that suggest users getting QUOTA_EXCEEDED error for RecordDelete operations. { "time":"21/07/2025, 7:57:46 UTC" "database":"PRIVATE" "zone":"***" "userId":"***" "operationId":"***" "operationGroupName":"2.3.3(185)" "operationType":"RecordDelete" "platform":"iPhone" "clientOS":"iOS;18.5" "overallStatus":"USER_ERROR" "error":"QUOTA_EXCEEDED" "requestId":"***" "executionTimeMs":"177" "interfaceType":"NATIVE" "recordInsertBytes":54352 "recordInsertCount":40 "returnedRecordTypes":"_pcs_data" } I'm confused as to what this means? Why would a RecordDelete operation have recordInsertBytes? I'd expect a RecordDelete operation to never fail on quotaExceeded and how would I handle that in the app?

I have some models in my app: [SDPlanBrief.self, SDAirport.self, SDChart.self, SDIndividualRunwayAirport.self, SDLocationBrief.self] SDLocationBrief has a @Relationship with SDChart When I went live with my app I didn't have a versioned schema, but quickly had to change that as I needed to add items to my SDPlanBrief Model. The first versioned schema I made included only the model that I had made a change to. static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [SDPlanBrief.self] } I had made zero changes to my model container and the whole time, and it was working fine. The migration worked well and this is what I was using: .modelContainer(for: [SDAirport.self, SDIndividualRunwayAirport.self, SDLocationBrief.self, SDChart.self, SDPlanBrief.self]) I then saw that to do this all properly, I should actually include ALL of my @Models in the versioned schema: enum AllSwiftDataSchemaV3: VersionedSchema { static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [SDPlanBrief.self, SDAirport.self, SDChart.self, SDIndividualRunwayAirport.self, SDLocationBrief.self] } static var versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(2, 0, 0) } extension AllSwiftDataSchemaV3 { @Model class SDPlanBrief { var destination: String etc... init(destination: String, etc...) { self.destination = destination etc... } } @Model class SDAirport { var catABMinima: String etc... init(catABMinima: String etc...) { self.catABMinima = catABMinima etc... } } @Model class SDChart: Identifiable { var key: String etc... var brief: SDLocationBrief? // @Relationship with SDChart init(key: String etc...) { self.key = key etc... } } @Model class SDIndividualRunwayAirport { var icaoCode: String etc... init(icaoCode: String etc...) { self.icaoCode = icaoCode etc... } } @Model class SDLocationBrief: Identifiable { var briefString: String etc... @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \SDChart.brief) var chartsArray = [SDChart]() init( briefString: String, etc... chartsArray: [SDChart] = [] ) { self.briefString = briefString etc... self.chartsArray = chartsArray } } } This is ALL my models in here btw. I saw also that modelContainer needed updating to work better for versioned schemas. I changed my modelContainer to look like this: actor ModelContainerActor { @MainActor static func container() -> ModelContainer { let schema = Schema( versionedSchema: AllSwiftDataSchemaV3.self ) let configuration = ModelConfiguration() let container = try! ModelContainer( for: schema, migrationPlan: PlanBriefMigrationPlan.self, configurations: configuration ) return container } } and I am passing in like so: .modelContainer(ModelContainerActor.container()) Each time I run the app now, I suddenly get this message a few times in a row: CoreData: error: Attempting to retrieve an NSManagedObjectModel version checksum while the model is still editable. This may result in an unstable verison checksum. Add model to NSPersistentStoreCoordinator and try again. I typealias all of these models too for the most recent V3 version eg: typealias SDPlanBrief = AllSwiftDataSchemaV3.SDPlanBrief Can someone see if I am doing something wrong here? It seems my TestFlight users are experiencing a crash every now and then when certain views load (I assume when accessing @Query objects). Seems its more so when a view loads quickly, like when removing a subscription view where the data may not have had time to load??? Can someone please have a look and help me out.

Here’s the situation: • You’re downloading a huge list of data from iCloud. • You’re saving it one by one (sequentially) into SwiftData. • You don’t want the SwiftUI view to refresh until all the data is imported. • After all the import is finished, SwiftUI should show the new data. The Problem If you insert into the same ModelContext that SwiftUI’s @Environment(.modelContext) is watching, each insert may cause SwiftUI to start reloading immediately. That will make the UI feel slow, and glitchy, because SwiftUI will keep trying to re-render while you’re still importing. How to achieve this in Swift Data ?

Hi everyone, I’m currently developing a SwiftUI app that uses SwiftData with CloudKit sharing enabled. The app works fine on my own Apple ID, and local syncing with iCloud is functioning correctly — but sharing with other Apple IDs consistently fails. Setup: SwiftUI + SwiftData using a ModelContainer with .shared configuration Sharing UI is handled via UICloudSharingController iCloud container: iCloud.com.de.SkerskiDev.FoodGuard Proper entitlements enabled (com.apple.developer.icloud-services, CloudKit, com.apple.developer.coredata.cloudkit.containers, etc.) Automatic provisioning profiles created by Xcode Error:<CKError 0x1143a2be0: "Bad Container" (5/1014); "Couldn't get container configuration from the server for container iCloud.com.de.SkerskiDev.FoodGuard"> What I’ve tried: Verified the iCloud container is correctly created and enabled in the Apple Developer portal Checked bundle identifier and container settings Rebuilt and reinstalled the app Ensured correct iCloud entitlements and signing capabilities Questions: Why does CloudKit reject the container for sharing while local syncing works fine? Are there known issues with SwiftData .shared containers and multi-user sharing? Are additional steps required (App Store Connect, privacy settings) to allow sharing with other Apple IDs? Any advice, experience, or example projects would be greatly appreciated. 🙏 Thanks! Sebastian

I have an app which uses ubiquitous containers and files in them to share data between devices. It's a bit unusual in that it indexes files in directories the user grants access to, which may or may not exist on a second device - those files are identified by SHA-1 hash. So a second device scanning before iCloud data has fully sync'd can create duplicate references which lead to an unpleasant user experience. To solve this, I store a small binary index in the root of the ubiquitous file container of the shared data, containing all of the known hashes, and as the user proceeds through the onboarding process, a background thread is attempting to "prime" the ubiquitous container by calling FileManager.default.startDownloadingUbiquitousItemAt() for each expected folder and file in a sane order. This likely creates a situation not anticipated by the iOS/iCloud integration's design, as it means my app has a sort of precognition of files it should not yet know about. In the common case, it works, but there is a corner case where iCloud sync has just begun, and very, very little metadata is available (the common case, however, in an emulator), in which two issues come up: I/O may hang indefinitely, trying to read a file as it is arriving. This one I can work around by running the I/O in a thread created with the POSIX pthread_create and using pthread_cancel to kill it after a timeout. Attempts to call FileManager.default.startDownloadingUbiquitousItemAt() fails with an error Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=257 "The file couldn’t be opened because you don’t have permission to view it.". The permissions aspect of it is nonsense, but I can believe there's no applicable "sort of exists, sort of doesn't" error code to use and someone punted. The problem is that this same error will be thrown on any attempt to access that file for the life of the application - a restart is required to make it usable. Clearly, the error or the hallucinated permission failure is cached somewhere in the bowels of iOS's FileManager. I was hoping startAccessingSecurityScopedResource() would allow me to bypass such a cache, as it does with URL.resourceValues() returning stale file sizes and last modified times. But it does not. Is there some way to clear this state without popping up a UI with an Exit button (not exactly the desired iOS user experience)?

I have an app that I signed and distribute between some internal testflight users. Potentially I want to invite some 'Public' beta testers which don't need to validate (_World have read rights in the public database) Question: Do I need to have a working public CloudKit , when users are invited through TestFlight, or are they going to test on the development container? I understand that when I invite beta-tester without authorization (external testers) they cannot access the developer container, so therefore I need to have the production CloudKit container up and running. I have tried to populate the public production container, but for whatever reason my upload app still goes to the development container. I have archived the app, and tried, but no luck. I let xcode manage my certificates/profiles. but what do I need to change to be able to use my upload file to upload the production container, instead of the development. I tried: init() { container = CKContainer(identifier: "iCloud.com.xxxx.xxxx") publicDB = container.publicCloudDatabase I got no error in the console, but data is always populated to the development database, instead the production. I tried to create a provisioning profile, but for some reason Xcode doesn't like it. Tried to create one a different provisioning profile manual through the developer portal, for the app. but xcode doesn't want to use that, and mentions that the requirement are already in place. What can I check/do to solve this.

Hello, I'm planning to had an onboarding to one of my apps. I am thinking about a way for a user to not see the onboarding again if he installs the app on another device. So for example, the user completes the onboarding on its iPhone, then downloads the app on its iPad and launch it, he doesn't see the onboarding a second time. I thought about using iCloud NSUbiquitousKeyValueStored to store the onboarding completion state. But I'm not sure when the data is synced to the other device logged into the same Apple account: Immediately even if the app is not installed on the other device (independent from the app, only iCloud thing)? At the same time as the app install on the other device? After the app is first launched on the other device? Of course synchronisation will depend on the Internet connection, speed, etc. so the app should handle the case where the data is not here but what would be the best case scenario? Thank you, Axel

LSUB always returns all the subscribed folders. For example lsub "" "test/*" returns a list of all the folders and not just subscribed folders that are subfolders of test. I.e, it returns the same folder list as lsub "" "*". For more details please see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1817707#c15

I have two different VersionedSchema accessed via two different and distinct in-memory ModelContainers. However, both schemas have a model named Item. LocalSchema.Item and RemoteSchema.Item have slightly different properties. If I create and save RemoteSchema.Item in one context then I cannot create and save LocalSchema.Item in a different context due to missing origin property. enum LocalSchema: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] = [ Item.self ] @Model class Item { @Attribute(.unique) var title: String var created: Date var modified: Date init(title: String, created: Date, modified: Date) { self.title = title self.created = created self.modified = modified } } } enum RemoteSchema: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier: Schema.Version = .init(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] = [ Item.self ] @Model class Item { var title: String var created: Date var modified: Date var origin: String init(title: String, created: Date, modified: Date, origin: String) { self.title = title self.created = created self.modified = modified self.origin = origin } } } In the above example, saving RemoteSchema.Item will cause LocalSchema.Item to fail. The error message I see is *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSUnknownKeyException', reason: '[<NSManagedObject 0xa120f3750> setValue:forUndefinedKey:]: the entity Item is not key value coding-compliant for the key "origin".' Test Code @Test func createLocalItemWithManualSave() async throws { let context = ModelContext(try localStore()) let item = LocalSchema.Item(title: "local", created: .now, modified: .now) context.insert(item) try context.save() } @Test func createRemoteItemWithManualSave() async throws { let context = ModelContext(try remoteStore()) let item = RemoteSchema.Item(title: "remote", created: .now, modified: .now, origin: "from space") context.insert(item) try context.save() } func localStore() throws -> ModelContainer { let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: LocalSchema.self) let config = ModelConfiguration("local", schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: true, allowsSave: true, cloudKitDatabase: .none) return try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: config) } func remoteStore() throws -> ModelContainer { let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: RemoteSchema.self) let config = ModelConfiguration("remote", schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: true, allowsSave: true, cloudKitDatabase: .none) return try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: config) } I have created FB22310365

I have a ModelActor that creates a hierarchy of models and returns a PersistentIdentifier for the root. I'd like to do that in a transaction, but I don't know of a good method of getting that identifier if the models are created in a transaction. For instance, an overly simple example: func createItem(timestamp: Date) throws -> PersistentIdentifier { try modelContext.transaction { let item = Item(timestamp: timestamp) modelContext.insert(item) } // how to return item.persistentModelID? } I can't return the item.persistentModelID from the transaction closure and even if I could, it will be a temporary ID until after the transaction is executed. I can't create the Item outside the transaction and just have the transaction do an insert because swift will raise a data race error if you then try to return item.persistentModelID. Is there any way to do this besides a modelContext.fetch* with separate unique identifiers?

Does the CloudKit participant limit of 100 include the owner?

I've been seeing something that I find odd when using two SwiftData models where if I have one model (book, in this case) that has an optional array of another model (page, in this case), the optional array starts out as set to nil, but after about 20 seconds it updates to being an empty array. I see it in Previews and after building. Is this expected behavior? Should I just assume that if there is an optional array in my model it will eventually be initialized to an empty array? Code is below. import SwiftUI import SwiftData @Model final class Book { var title: String = "New Book" @Relationship var pages: [Page]? = nil init(title: String) { self.title = title } } @Model final class Page { var content: String = "Page Content" var book: Book? = nil init() { } } struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query private var books: [Book] var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { List { ForEach(books) { book in NavigationLink { Text("\(book.title)") Text(book.pages?.debugDescription ?? "pages is nil") } label: { Text("\(book.title)") Spacer() Text("\(book.pages?.count.description ?? "pages is nil" )") } } } HStack { Button("Clear Data") { clearData() } Button("Add Book") { addBook() } } .navigationSplitViewColumnWidth(min: 180, ideal: 200) } detail: { Text("Select an item") } } private func clearData() { for book in books { modelContext.delete(book) } try? modelContext.save() } private func addBook() { let newBook = Book(title: "A New Book") modelContext.insert(newBook) } } @main struct BookPageApp: App { var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { let schema = Schema([Book.self, Page.self]) let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: false) do { return try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } }() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(sharedModelContainer) } } #Preview { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Book.self, inMemory: true) }

As of 2025-05-03, when a macOS user enables iCloud Drive synchronization for Desktop &amp; Documents in US region, does iCloud filter xattrs upon upload or later when downloading back to another macOS host? Or is it the case that iCloud has no filtering of third-party xattrs? Where can I find the technical document outlining exactly what iCloud does with xattrs set on macOS host files and folders synchronized with iCloud Drive?

I have a UIKit app where I've adopted SwiftData and I'm struggling with a crash coming in from some of my users. I'm not able to reproduce it myself and as it only happens to a small fraction of my user base, it seems like a race condition of some sort. This is the assertion message: SwiftData/DefaultStore.swift:453: Fatal error: API Contract Violation: Editors must register their identifiers before invoking operations on this store SwiftData.DefaultStore: 00CF060A-291A-4E79-BEC3-E6A6B20F345E did not. (ID is unique per crash) This is the ModelActor that crashes: @available(iOS 17, *) @ModelActor actor ConsumptionDatabaseStorage: ConsumptionSessionStorage { struct Error: LocalizedError { var errorDescription: String? } private let sortDescriptor = [SortDescriptor(\SDConsumptionSession.startTimeUtc, order: .reverse)] static func createStorage(userId: String) throws -> ConsumptionDatabaseStorage { guard let appGroupContainer = FileManager.default.containerURL(forSecurityApplicationGroupIdentifier: UserDefaults.defaultAppGroupIdentifier) else { throw Error(errorDescription: "Invalid app group container ID") } func createModelContainer(databaseUrl: URL) throws -> ModelContainer { return try ModelContainer(for: SDConsumptionSession.self, SDPriceSegment.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration(url: databaseUrl)) } let databaseUrl = appGroupContainer.appendingPathComponent("\(userId).sqlite") do { return self.init(modelContainer: try createModelContainer(databaseUrl: databaseUrl)) } catch { // Creating the model storage failed. Remove the database file and try again. try? FileManager.default.removeItem(at: databaseUrl) return self.init(modelContainer: try createModelContainer(databaseUrl: databaseUrl)) } } func isStorageEmpty() async -> Bool { (try? self.modelContext.fetchCount(FetchDescriptor<SDConsumptionSession>())) ?? 0 == 0 // <-- Crash here! } func sessionsIn(interval: DateInterval) async throws -> [ConsumptionSession] { let fetchDescriptor = FetchDescriptor(predicate: #Predicate<SDConsumptionSession> { sdSession in if let startDate = sdSession.startTimeUtc { return interval.start <= startDate && interval.end > startDate } else { return false } }, sortBy: self.sortDescriptor) let consumptionSessions = try self.modelContext.fetch(fetchDescriptor) // <-- Crash here! return consumptionSessions.map { ConsumptionSession(swiftDataSession: $0) } } func updateSessions(sessions: [ConsumptionSession]) async throws { if #unavailable(iOS 18) { // Price segments are duplicated if re-inserted so unfortunately we have to delete and reinsert sessions. // On iOS 18, this is enforced by the #Unique macro on SDPriceSegment. let sessionIds = Set(sessions.map(\.id)) try self.modelContext.delete(model: SDConsumptionSession.self, where: #Predicate<SDConsumptionSession> { sessionIds.contains($0.id) }) } for session in sessions { self.modelContext.insert(SDConsumptionSession(consumptionSession: session)) } if self.modelContext.hasChanges { try self.modelContext.save() } } func deleteAllSessions() async { if #available(iOS 18, *) { try? self.modelContainer.erase() } else { self.modelContainer.deleteAllData() } } } The actor conforms to this protocol: protocol ConsumptionSessionStorage { func isStorageEmpty() async -> Bool func hasCreditCardSessions() async -> Bool func sessionsIn(interval: DateInterval) async throws -> [ConsumptionSession] func updateSessions(sessions: [ConsumptionSession]) async throws func deleteAllSessions() async } The crash is coming in from line 30 and 41, in other words, when trying to fetch data from the database. There doesn't seem to be any common trait for the crashes. They occur across iOS versions and device types. Any idea what might cause this?