Currently I have an app which is completely free for all the users, I might have future versions where I will introduce paid version, where I will surely use Apple IAP and Revenue CAT. How should I clarify this to App store? Should I tell only what I am doing today, or also tell what I will do in future and keep Apple IAP in my conversation?

**Environment Platform:** iOS Distribution: TestFlight Product type: Consumable In-App Purchase Account used for testing: Real Apple ID (not Sandbox) StoreKit: StoreKit 1 iOS version: iOS 17+ (also reproduced on earlier versions) Issue Description We are encountering an issue when testing consumable in-app purchases in a TestFlight build using a real Apple ID. Under normal circumstances, consumable products should be purchasable repeatedly. However, in TestFlight, after a successful purchase flow, the same product may become unavailable for repurchase, and the transaction appears to be stuck, even though: • finishTransaction: is correctly called • The transaction state is .purchased • No pending transactions are left in the payment queue Once this happens, subsequent purchase attempts result in behavior similar to a non-consumable product (e.g. “already purchased” or no purchase UI shown).

Environment OS: iOS 26.2 ~ 26.3 SDK: Xcode 16.4 (Target: iOS 17.6) Framework: StoreKit 2 Environment: Production (Cannot reproduce in Sandbox or Xcode Configuration) Issue Description We are encountering a critical purchase failure that occurs exclusively in the Production environment. When a user who has a "Pending Downgrade" (scheduled for the next renewal date) attempts to re-purchase their current higher-tier product to cancel the downgrade, StoreKit 2 returns an error. Steps to Reproduce User is currently on "Product A" (Higher Tier). User schedules a downgrade to "Product B" (Lower Tier). The status changes to "Pending Downgrade". User attempts to purchase "Product A" again via Product.purchase(). The system purchase sheet appears, and the user confirms the purchase. Immediately after authentication, a system alert from StoreKit appears saying: "Cannot process request at this time. Please try again later." (現在リクエストを一時的に処理できません。しばらくしてからもう一度お試しください。) After dismissing the alert, the app receives StoreKitError code 2 (unknown) with the localized message: "Request could not be completed" (リクエストを完了できません). Technical Observations Transaction.currentEntitlements: Does not change. App Store Server Notifications (V2): No notifications are sent to our server. Sandbox Behavior: Works perfectly. Re-purchasing Product A successfully cancels the downgrade and the subscription remains at the Higher Tier. AppStore.sync(): Running a manual sync does not resolve the pending state after the error. Question Since we cannot debug production-level logs, we are stuck. Is this a known regression in the StoreKit 2 commerce engine regarding state synchronization for downgrades? Has anyone found a workaround for this specific scenario? Any insights would be greatly appreciated.

在iOS26.4中，新的交易完成后[NSBundle mainBundle] appStoreReceiptURL 获取的是历史票据，未给出新的票据

Hello, I am investigating a case where two different transaction IDs appear to refer to the same purchase, and I would like clarification on whether this behavior is expected. Additional context StoreKit version: StoreKit 1 (SKPaymentTransaction) Environment: Production Product type: Auto-renewable subscription Transaction sources The values are obtained from the following APIs: transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/skpaymentqueue receipt_data from the App Store receipt https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/bundle/appstorereceipturl Observed behavior After an In-App Purchase completes, the app receives: a transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction the corresponding receipt_data for the purchase When inspecting the receipt, the transaction_id inside latest_receipt_info differs from the transaction_id received directly from the purchase transaction. For clarity: A = transaction_id received from the purchase flow (SKPaymentTransaction) A' = transaction_id found in receipt_data.latest_receipt_info The two values are different, but they differ only by 1. Additional observation The original_transaction_id for A and A' is identical, which suggests that both transaction IDs belong to the same subscription purchase chain. Pattern observation on the ID difference We have observed that the difference between A and A' is consistently exactly 1 (i.e., A' = A + 1) across multiple transactions, not just a single case. This appears to be a reproducible pattern rather than a coincidence. This observation raises an additional question (Question 6 below). API verification When calling: GET /inApps/v1/transactions/{transactionId} Both A and A' return what appears to be the same purchase record. The response data is effectively identical except for the transactionId field. However, when calling: GET /inApps/v2/history/{transactionId} A does not appear in the transaction history only A' appears in the history response Questions If A does not appear in transaction history, where does this transaction ID originate from? Why does Get Transaction Info (/inApps/v1/transactions/{transactionId}) return a valid response for A even though it is not present in the transaction history? Why do A and A' both resolve to what appears to be the same purchase? In this situation, which transaction ID should be treated as the canonical transaction ID for server-side validation? Is this difference related to how StoreKit 1 (SKPaymentTransaction) and the App Store Server API represent transactions? Is the consistent off-by-one difference between the transaction_id from SKPaymentTransaction and the one recorded in latest_receipt_info an intentional behavior of StoreKit 1's internal transaction ID assignment? Specifically, we are wondering whether StoreKit 1 applies some form of internal offset when delivering the transaction ID to the client, while the App Store server records a different (adjacent) ID in the receipt. If so, is this documented anywhere? Note We are currently in the process of migrating to StoreKit 2, but this behavior was observed while investigating our existing StoreKit 1 implementation. Any clarification would help us better understand the correct transaction model during the migration.

I’m working on a Flutter application that implements subscriptions using in-app purchases (IAP). I currently have two apps under the same developer account: One for staging One for production In App A (staging), I successfully created a monthly subscription with the product ID: rc_1299_monthly However, when I try to create a subscription with the same product ID (rc_1299_monthly) in App B (production), I encounter the following error: "The Product ID you entered is already being used by another subscription." My understanding was that product IDs are scoped per app, but this error suggests there may be account-level constraints. Has anyone encountered this before? Is it required to use unique product IDs across all apps under the same account, or is there a recommended approach for handling staging vs production setups? Any clarification or best practices would be appreciated.

We have been using the purchase date to identify the latest transaction_id for a given original_transaction_id. However, I’ve noticed several cases where an immediate upgrade does not result in a later purchase date—in some instances, it is actually earlier than the previous transaction. Given this inconsistency, would it be more reliable to sort by transaction_id in descending order instead?

Hello Apple Developer Support, We are seeing a payment issue affecting users on iOS 26.3 and 26.4. Many users report that after a successful purchase flow, the purchased content is not delivered in-game. After investigation, we found that storeController?.ConfirmPurchase(pendingOrder); does not always effectively complete the transaction. As a result, the same receipt is sent to the client again on the next purchase attempt or after app restart. This causes repeated pending transactions and prevents users from purchasing the item again. Some affected users requested refunds from Apple, but those requests were rejected. Among 19 reported users: 11 users are on iOS 26.4 (recently upgraded) The remaining users are on iOS 26.3 We also received similar reports on earlier iOS 26 versions. Development environment: Unity Unity In-App Purchasing (IAP) 4.13.0 Could you please help confirm whether there are known StoreKit / transaction completion issues on iOS 26.3+ and suggest the recommended handling for this case? Thank you.

We are launching a new app with a subscription in-app purchase (IAP). The Status of the IAP is "Waiting for Review". We want to submit the app to app for review, but the section to select an IAP with the app is not appearing. According to online sources, if we submit a new app for review, without selecting the IAP that goes with it, then the app may be released in the App Store without users being able to purchase the IAP. This actually happened to us years ago and I can't remember how we got around it, but it was painful. It seems strange that Apple would allow this problem to persist for years. Why not just hire an intern to fix it? Maybe because they are too busy running around in circles at the new spaceship headquarters. Regardless, our IAP has been sitting in "Waiting for Review" status for a while now and I'm concerned it may never be approved. Any advice would be appreciated.

I am unable to sign in to a Sandbox Apple Account, where this issue occurs only via Simulator. Under Settings > Developer, I tap "Sign In" under Sandbox Apple Account. I enter my account credentials, and after bringing me back to the Developer page, the Sign In button briefly appears as disabled, before being re-enabled, without signing in to the account. (The account credentials are also recognized as correct, as I will receive an alert popup if incorrect.) See screenshots below: After signing in, Sign In button appears disabled... ... then is re-enabled without actually signing in to the account. I have now tried setting up multiple sandbox accounts via App Store Connect with various permutations (no confirmation of Apple Account email, confirming Apple Account email, logging in to iCloud and accepting terms of service), running different device simulators, running simulators on different Mac computers... none of which yield a different result. By contrast, I can sign in to the Sandbox Apple Account without issue on a physical device. The problem occurs only via Simulator.

When my app tries to access a subscription, StoreKit's products(for:) always returns zero results. Similarly, SubscriptionStoreView always shows "Subscription Unavailable" followed by "The subscription is unavailable in the current storefront". The app is a watch-only app (no iPhone companion app). The app and the subscription product were each approved in App Store Connect over two weeks ago. The problem occurs when the app is installed from TestFlight, when the app is installed from the App Store (production), and when run in the Xcode debugger. The only time the app successfully accesses the subscription when simulating it in Xcode with a .storekit file. How should my app access the subscription? Repro: App Store bundle ID: com.toolsay.hoopref Phone app target (unused) bundle ID: com.toolsay.hoopref Watch app bundle ID: com.toolsay.hoopref.watchapp Subscription product ID: com.toolsay.hoopref.pro.annual Subscription availability: All countries and regions App Store listing let products = try await Product.products(for: ["com.toolsay.hoopref.pro.annual"]) products.count is 0.

after doing all the steps as in The app version submission must be in the “Prepare for Submission” state There must be at least one IAP/subscription in the “Ready to Submit” state All banking & agreements must set up and in place I am still not seeing the In-App purchase and subscription in my iOS App Version page to add to my newest version slash build

Hello, I’m trying to understand which Apple subscription offer best fits a coupon-like flow in our app. Our ideal case is a 1-month Pro benefit that users can trigger inside the app: without entering a code manually possibly more than once over time then continue into a normal paid auto-renewable subscription Ideally, this would work for new, existing, and lapsed users, and if possible, even for users who are already actively subscribed (though that part is not required). From the docs, I understand that: Offer Codes require redemption Promotional Offers are for existing or previously subscribed users Introductory Offers are for new eligible users Win-Back Offers are for lapsed subscribers So my questions are: Is there any Apple-supported way to do this without manual code entry? Can the same user receive this kind of 1-month benefit multiple times over time? Which offer type is the closest fit? Is this use case partly incompatible with Apple’s subscription system? Thanks.

Hello, We are facing an issue with In-App Purchases (subscriptions) in two iOS apps built with React Native + react-native-iap. Issue Some users receive the error: E_CONNECTION_CLOSED during the purchase flow. However: The payment is successfully deducted via the App Store. The subscription appears in the user's Apple ID subscription list. But on our side: The app does not receive the StoreKit transaction callback No receipt or transaction ID is delivered Our backend cannot validate the purchase. Restore Purchases When affected users try Restore Purchases, StoreKit returns: No purchases found even though the subscription is visible in their Apple ID. Most affected users are from India, and many payments are made via UPI through App Store billing. Has anyone experienced a case where: the user is charged the subscription exists in Apple ID but StoreKit never returns the transaction or receipt? Any suggestions on how to recover these transactions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi, my app was rejected because IAP were not present in the app. I followed guidelines more carefully and filled all buisness detail since then. And now I have: StoreKit Configuration in XCode is set to None, Products (subscription + consumable product) are already approved (from the previous review) Paid Apps Agreement - active Bank account - active Tax forms - active Compliance - active Problems: When trying to test it with TestFlight + sandbox account, StoreKit is returning zero products. When trying to check my products by "initiate transaction" from Sandbox App Store manage dashboard I am getting an error "This item is not available" I am totally stuck and don't know what to process next. Unfortunately API.

I've added .storeButton(.visible, for:.policies) to my SubscriptionStoreView, and the buttons do appear, but when I tap on them I get a sheet that just says "Terms of Service Unavailable / Somethng went wrong. Try Again.". (similar for Privacy Policy). Is this expected in development? Will these start working correctly in production? (and, more importantly, in App Review?) The docs say that these use the values (i.e. URLs) set in App Store Connect, but that I can override those. This is a new app. Is that wrong, do I need to set the URLs explicitly? Edited to add: the console reports: Failed to fetch terms of service and privacy policy: Error Domain=NSURLErrorDomain Code=-1011 "(null)"

Hi - Using storekit2 on ios26.2 and using presentOfferCodeRedeemSheet to allow users to leverage Offer Codes. The codes work (sandbox and production), however on the confirmation view that shows Redeem Special Offer, while my App Icon is properly displayed up top, the associated product subscription image is missing and I see a grey App Store image/icon instead. I do successfully see the associated subscription and pricing to the right. My subscription product images are already reviewed/approved and have been live for a number of weeks. I see this in Sandbox and Production (with a live customer sending me the phone screenshot). PS, my product icons/logos all show up successfully during normal checkout in sandbox/production, this only occurs on Offer Code Redemption views.

Hi everyone, We are currently working on improving our subscription backend integration with Apple’s App Store Server API and StoreKit, and had a few questions around StoreKit 1 vs StoreKit 2 behavior and server-to-server notifications. Looking for clarification on the following points: /inApps/v1/subscriptions/{originalTransactionId} response compatibility Does the App Store Server API endpoint /inApps/v1/subscriptions/{originalTransactionId} return consistent response structures for subscriptions created via StoreKit 1 and StoreKit 2, or are there any differences we should account for when parsing the response? Transaction format in S2S notifications for StoreKit 1 purchases If a user initially purchases a subscription using StoreKit 1, and the subscription renews later, what transaction format is sent in server-to-server notifications? Does Apple still maintain StoreKit 1 style transaction payloads, or Are they converted into StoreKit 2–style signed transactions? Validation of signedTransactionInfo and signedRenewalInfo In App Store Server Notifications V2, the payload includes signedTransactionInfo and signedRenewalInfo. Is there an official Apple API endpoint that can be used to validate these tokens? Offer / coupon identification from S2S notifications Can server-to-server notifications reliably indicate which offer was applied (intro offer, promotional offer, or offer code)? If yes, which fields in the transaction payload should be used to identify this? Trial period identification in StoreKit 2 In StoreKit 1, the field is_trial_period was commonly used to detect free trials. Since this is deprecated in StoreKit 2, which field or transaction property should be used to identify whether a purchase corresponds to a trial period?

Hello, Can someone please tell me why the unlock button was unresponsive when tapped? The restore button worked. if let price = store.product?.displayPrice { Text(price) .font(.title2.bold()) .padding(.top, 4) } Button { Task { await store.purchase() } } label: { ZStack { if store.isLoading { ProgressView() .tint(.white) } else { Text("paywall.buy") .font(.headline) } } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity) .padding() } .background(.blue) .foregroundStyle(.white) .clipShape(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 14)) .disabled(store.product == nil || store.isLoading) Button { Task { await store.restorePurchases() } } label: { Text("paywall.restore") }

Hello, I am currently implementing External Purchase Link and External Purchase Custom Link and am encountering an issue where both ExternalPurchaseLink.canOpen and ExternalPurchaseCustomLink.isEligible always return false under all test conditions. I would like to confirm whether my setup is missing any required steps or whether this behavior is expected. Below are the details of my current environment and configuration: 🔧 1. Development Environment Xcode: 16.3, 16.4, 26.0 beta 4 Devices: iPhone running iOS 26.2 beta iPhone running iOS 16.7.12 macOS 15.5 (real device testing) Simulator iOS 18.0 Build Type: Local development build using a Developer Provisioning Profile Sandbox account signed in during testing 🔑 2. Entitlements (Developer site & Xcode) In Certificates → Identifiers → App ID, both capabilities are enabled: StoreKit External Purchase StoreKit External Purchase Link The .entitlements file in Xcode includes: com.apple.developer.storekit.external-purchase = YES com.apple.developer.storekit.external-purchase-link = YES The Provisioning Profile also contains both entitlements (confirmed via codesign -d --entitlements :-). 📄 3. Info.plist Configuration Both keys are configured with correct region codes according to documentation: SKExternalPurchase SKExternalPurchaseCustomLinkRegions 🌍 4. Test Storefront Device storefront verified as United States (US) or Portugal (PT) (US = target region for External Purchase Link, PT = EU region) But despite all the above configuration, both API calls consistently return false: ExternalPurchaseLink.canOpen // false ExternalPurchaseCustomLink.isEligible // false So I cannot proceed to testing the remaining flow (token retrieval, link opening, etc.) ------ Questions ------ ❓ Q1) Local Development Build Limitation Is it expected behavior that Developer-signed local builds always return canOpen = false / isEligible = false for External Purchase Link & Custom Link? Is there a technical or policy restriction that prevents eligibility in local dev builds? ❓ Q2) App Store Connect Configuration Requirement Are there mandatory App Store Connect settings (such as external purchase URLs, support URL, disclosures, or country configuration) that must be enabled before eligibility becomes true? Currently, no External Purchase Link or Custom Link menu is visible in my App Store Connect app settings. Is this menu only available after certain approvals or under specific conditions? ❓ Q3) TestFlight Requirement Do External Purchase Link and Custom Link only return eligibility = true on: TestFlight builds, or Distribution-signed builds? Or should eligibility also work on developer builds? Formal confirmation would be helpful. ❓ Q4) Developer Account Type Limitation We are using an Individual Developer Account (not Organization). Can Individual accounts fully request, test, and ship apps using: External Purchase Link External Purchase Custom Link Or are there limitations on account type? 🙏 Request We have completed all documented setup steps (Entitlements → Provisioning → Info.plist), but eligibility remains false, blocking feature validation. Please clarify which of the following is the cause: Local development builds do not support eligibility Missing App Store Connect configuration (not visible to us) Account type restriction Region rollout or entitlement approval requirement Any additional setup not documented publicly Thank you for your assistance.