Hi everyone In the last 24 hours, I’ve been running into some issues with the CloudKit console. Most of the time, I‘ll get an error stating an error has caused this web page to stop working correctly. Reloading doesn’t fix the issue, nor does using different browsers: Today I’ve got another error, something along the lines of the Console not being able to fetch the teams I’m assigned to and an XHF error pop-up. Has anyone encountered the same issues? After trying multiple times, I’m able to reach my database but it’s a bit frustrating as it’s very unreliable this way. Thanks for your feedback! Dave

Hello Devs, I'm encountering a persistent INTERNAL_ERROR (HTTP 500) when making Server-to-Server API calls to CloudKit, specifically when trying to hit the /users/current endpoint, even after meticulously verifying all client-side components. I'm hoping someone might have insight into what could cause this. Context: Goal: Authenticate to CloudKit from a Vercel Serverless Function (Node.js) to perform operations like record queries. Problem Endpoint: POST https://api.apple-cloudkit.com/database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Key Generation Method: Using the CloudKit Dashboard's "Tokens & Keys" -> "New Server-to-Server Key" flow, where I generate the private key using openssl ecparam -name prime256v1 -genkey -noout -out mykey.pem, then extract the public key using openssl ec -in mykey.pem -pubout, and paste the public key material (between BEGIN/END markers) into the dashboard. The private key was then converted to PKCS#8 format using openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -nocrypt -in mykey.pem -out mykey_pkcs8.pem. Current Setup Being Tested (in a Vercel Node.js function): CLOUDKIT_CONTAINER: iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball CLOUDKIT_KEY_ID: 9368dddf141ce9bc0da743b9f69bc3eda132b9bb3e62a4167e428d4f320b656e (This is the Key ID generated from the CloudKit Dashboard for the public key I provided). CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY (Environment Variable): Contains the base64 encoded string of the entire content of my PKCS#8 formatted private key file. Key Processing in Code: const p8Base64 = process.env.CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY; const privateKeyPEM = Buffer.from(p8Base64, 'base64').toString('utf8'); // This privateKeyPEM string starts with "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----" and ends with "-----END PRIVATE KEY-----" const privateKey = crypto.createPrivateKey({ key: privateKeyPEM, format: 'pem' }); // This line SUCCEEDS without DECODER errors in my Vercel function logs. Use code with caution. JavaScript Request Body for /users/current: "{}" Signing String (message = Date:BodyHash:Path): Date: Correct ISO8601 format (e.g., "2025-05-21T19:38:11.886Z") BodyHash: Correct SHA256 hash of "{}", then Base64 encoded (e.g., "RBNvo1WzZ4oRRq0W9+hknpT7T8If536DEMBg9hyq/4o=") Path: Exactly /database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Headers: X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-KeyID: Set to the correct Key ID. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-ISO8601Date: Set to the date used in the signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-SignatureV1: Set to the generated signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Environment: "production" Content-Type: "application/json" Observed Behavior & Logs: The Node.js crypto.createPrivateKey call successfully parses the decoded PEM key in my Vercel function. The request is sent to CloudKit. CloudKit responds with HTTP 500 and the following JSON body (UUID varies per request): { "uuid": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx", "serverErrorCode": "INTERNAL_ERROR" } Use code with caution. Json This happens consistently. Previously, with other key pairs or different P8 processing attempts, I was getting AUTHENTICATION_FAILED (401) or local DECODER errors. Now that the key parsing is successful on my end with this current key pair and setup, I'm hitting this INTERNAL_ERROR. Troubleshooting Done: Verified Key ID (9368dddf...) is correct and corresponds to the key generated via CloudKit Dashboard. Verified Container ID (iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball) is correct. Successfully parsed the private key from the environment variable (after base64 decoding) within the Vercel function. Meticulously checked the signing string components (Date, BodyHash, Path) against Apple's documentation. Path format is /database/1////. Ensured all required headers are present with correct values. Local Node.js tests (bypassing Vercel but using the same key data and signing logic) also result in this INTERNAL_ERROR. Question: What could cause CloudKit to return an INTERNAL_ERROR (500) for a /users/current request when the client-side key parsing is successful and all request components (path, body hash for signature, date, headers) appear to conform exactly to the Server-to-Server Web Services Reference? Are there any known subtle issues with EC keys generated via openssl ecparam (and then converted to PKCS#8) that might lead to this, even if crypto.createPrivateKey parses them in Node.js? Could there be an issue with my specific Key ID or container that would manifest this way, requiring Apple intervention? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can provide more detailed logs of the request components if needed. Thank you!

Hello, I tried to validate if my app was properly syncing to the cloud. To test this, I created some data in the app, and then deleted the app, and reinstalled. I was expecting the data to still exist but it isn't. Is this a valid test or is the data expected to be deleted when app is deleted?

Hi, I keep trying to use transformable to store an array of strings with SwiftData, and I can see that it is activating the transformer, but it keeps saying that I am still using NSArray instead of NSData. *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: 'Unacceptable type of value for attribute: property = "category"; desired type = NSData; given type = Swift.__SwiftDeferredNSArray; value = ( yo, gurt ).' terminating due to uncaught exception of type NSException CoreSimulator 1010.10 - Device: iPhone 16 18.0 (6879535B-3174-4025-AD37-ED06E60291AD) - Runtime: iOS 18.0 (22A3351) - DeviceType: iPhone 16 Message from debugger: killed @Model class MyModel: Identifiable, Equatable { @Attribute(.transformable(by: StringArrayTransformer.self)) var category: [String]? @Attribute(.transformable(by: StringArrayTransformer.self)) var amenities: [String]? var image: String? var parentChunck: MyModelDataChunk_V1? init(category: [String]?, amenities: [String]?) { self.category = category self.amenities = amenities } } class StringArrayTransformer: ValueTransformer { override func transformedValue(_ value: Any?) -> Any? { print(value) guard let array = value as? [String] else { return nil } let data = try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: array, options: []) print(data) return data } override func reverseTransformedValue(_ value: Any?) -> Any? { guard let data = value as? Data else { return nil } let string = (try? JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: [])) as? [String] print(string) return string } override class func transformedValueClass() -> AnyClass { return NSData.self } override class func allowsReverseTransformation() -> Bool { return true } static func register() { print("regitsering") ValueTransformer.setValueTransformer(StringArrayTransformer(), forName: .stringArrayTransformerName) } } extension NSValueTransformerName { static let stringArrayTransformerName = NSValueTransformerName("StringArrayTransformer") }

Hi everyone, I am a beginner in iOS/Swift programming. I'm trying to develop a mobile application that allows to mount a network drive in the iphone Files application via the WebDav protocol. I saw on the internet that WebDav is no longer implemented in iOS because considered deprecated by apple. To accomplish this task, I decided to separate responsibilities as follows: Framework: WebDav (responsible for communication with the WebDav server) FileProviderExtension: FileBridge (Responsible for bridging the gap between the WebDav Framework and the iOS Files app) Main App I also have an AppGroup that includes the main application and the fileproviderextension Initially, to measure the feasibility and complexity of this task, I'd like to make a simplistic version that simply displays the files on my drive in the Files app, without necessarily being able to interact with them. FileProviderExtension.swift: import FileProvider import WebDav class FileProviderExtension: NSObject, NSFileProviderReplicatedExtension { private var webDavService: WebDavService? required init(domain: NSFileProviderDomain) { super.init() self.webDavService = WebDavService(baseURL: URL(string: "https://www.mydrive.com/drive")!) } func invalidate() { // TODO: cleanup any resources } func item(for identifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { let progress = Progress(totalUnitCount: 1) Task { do { if let items = try await webDavService?.propfind(path: identifier.rawValue, depth: 1), let item = items.first(where: { $0.itemIdentifier == identifier }) { completionHandler(item, nil) } else { completionHandler(nil, NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFileNoSuchFileError, userInfo: nil)) } } catch { completionHandler(nil, error) } } return progress } func fetchContents(for itemIdentifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, version requestedVersion: NSFileProviderItemVersion?, request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (URL?, NSFileProviderItem?, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { let progress = Progress(totalUnitCount: 1) Task { do { guard let service = webDavService else { throw WebDavError.invalidResponse } let data = try await service.get(fileAt: itemIdentifier.rawValue) let tempURL = FileManager.default.temporaryDirectory.appendingPathComponent(itemIdentifier.rawValue) try data.write(to: tempURL) completionHandler(tempURL, nil, nil) } catch { completionHandler(nil, nil, error) } } return progress } func createItem(basedOn itemTemplate: NSFileProviderItem, fields: NSFileProviderItemFields, contents url: URL?, options: NSFileProviderCreateItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, NSFileProviderItemFields, Bool, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: a new item was created on disk, process the item's creation completionHandler(itemTemplate, [], false, nil) return Progress() } func modifyItem(_ item: NSFileProviderItem, baseVersion version: NSFileProviderItemVersion, changedFields: NSFileProviderItemFields, contents newContents: URL?, options: NSFileProviderModifyItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, NSFileProviderItemFields, Bool, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: an item was modified on disk, process the item's modification completionHandler(nil, [], false, NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFeatureUnsupportedError, userInfo:[:])) return Progress() } func deleteItem(identifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, baseVersion version: NSFileProviderItemVersion, options: NSFileProviderDeleteItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: an item was deleted on disk, process the item's deletion completionHandler(NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFeatureUnsupportedError, userInfo:[:])) return Progress() } func enumerator(for containerItemIdentifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, request: NSFileProviderRequest) throws -> NSFileProviderEnumerator { return FileProviderEnumerator(enumeratedItemIdentifier: containerItemIdentifier, service: webDavService) } } Here's the code I use to initialize my domain in the main app files: fileprivate func registerFileProviderDomain() { let domainIdentifier = NSFileProviderDomainIdentifier("FileProviderExtension Bundle Identifier") let domain = NSFileProviderDomain(identifier: domainIdentifier, displayName: "My Drive") NSFileProviderManager.add(domain) { error in NSFileProviderManager.add(domain) { error in if let error = error { print("Error cannot add domain file provider : \(error.localizedDescription)") } else { print("Success domain file provider added") } } } I can't get rid of the Error : Error cannot add domain file provider : The operation couldn’t be completed. Invalid argument. I don't know what I'm missing Please help me understand

Hi, I've been using Core Data + CloudKit via NSPersistentCloudKitContainer for several years now. Back then I just created my Core Data AND CloudKit fields by hand. Now the time has come for a little lightweight migration to a new Core Data model, let's say I just needed to add one String attribute. So I've done the Core Data local migration as usual, then added this to container code: try? persistentContainer.initializeCloudKitSchema(options: NSPersistentCloudKitContainerSchemaInitializationOptions()) Run. And everything worked great. but… Now I've noticed that CloudKit created new CKAsset fields for each String attribute that I had in Core Data (about 5 new CKAsset fields). Is this normal!? Why? ! Is it safe to deploy these changes to prod? ty. ChatGPT said: "This field is used internally by CloudKit to handle large string values. If the string value is small enough, it is stored in the normal String field, but if it exceeds the size limit (about 1KB), the string is automatically stored as a CKAsset."

I have a widely-used app that lets users keep track of personal data. This data is persisted with SwiftData, and synced with CloudKit. I understand that if the user's iCloud account changes on a device (for example, user logs out or toggles off an app's access to iCloud), then NSPersistentCloudKitContainer will erase the local data records on app launch. This is intentional behavior, intended as a privacy feature. However, we are receiving regular reports from users for whom the system has incorrectly indicated that the app's access to iCloud is unavailable, even when the user hasn't logged out or toggled off permission to access iCloud. This triggers the behavior to clear the local records, and even though the data is still available in iCloud, to the user, it looks like their data has disappeared for no reason. Helping the user find and troubleshoot their iCloud app data settings can be very difficult, since in many cases the user has no idea what iCloud is, and we can't link them directly to the correct settings screen. We seem to get these reports most frequently from users whose iCloud storage is full (which feels like punishment for not paying for additional storage), but we've also received reports from users who have enough storage space available (and are logged in and have the app's iCloud data permissions toggled on). It appears to happen randomly, as far as we can tell. I found a blog post from two years ago from another app developer who encountered the same issue: https://crunchybagel.com/nspersistentcloudkitcontainer/#:~:text=The%20problem%20we%20were%20experiencing To work around this and improve the user experience, we want to use CKContainer.accountStatus to check if the user has an available iCloud account, and if not, disable the CloudKit sync before it erases the local data. I've found steps to accomplish this workaround using CoreData, but I'm not sure how to best modify the ModelContainer's configuration after receiving the CKAccountStatus when using SwiftData. I've put together this approach so far; is this the right way to handle disabling/enabling sync based on account status? import SwiftUI import SwiftData import CloudKit @main struct AccountStatusTestApp: App { @State private var modelContainer: ModelContainer? var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { if let modelContainer { ContentView() .modelContainer(modelContainer) } else { ProgressView("Loading...") .task { await initializeModelContainer() } } } } func initializeModelContainer() async { let schema = Schema([ Item.self, ]) do { let accountStatus = try await CKContainer.default().accountStatus() let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration( schema: schema, cloudKitDatabase: accountStatus == .available ? .private("iCloud.com.AccountStatusTestApp") : .none ) do { let container = try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) modelContainer = container } catch { print("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } } catch { print("Could not determine iCloud account status: \(error)") } } } I understand that bypassing the clearing of local data when the iCloud account is "unavailable" introduces possible issues with data being mingled on shared devices, but I plan to mitigate that with warning messages when users are in this state. This would be a far more preferable user experience than what's happening now.

Hi everyone, I've recently implemented CKSyncEngine in my app, and I have two questions regarding its behavior: Duplicate FetchedRecordZoneChanges After Sending Changes: I’ve noticed that the engine sometimes receives a FetchedRecordZoneChanges event containing modifications and deletions that were just sent by the same device a few moments earlier. This event arrives after the SentRecordZoneChanges event, and both events share the same recordChangeTag, which results in double-handling the record. Is this expected behavior? I’d like to confirm if this is how CKSyncEngine works or if I might be overlooking something. Handling Initial Sync with a "Sync Screen": When a user opens the app for the first time and already has data stored in iCloud, I need to display a "Sync Screen" temporarily to prevent showing partial data or triggering abrupt, rapid UI changes. I’ve found that canceling current operations, then awaiting sendChanges() and fetchChanges() works well to ensure data is fully synced before dismissing the sync screen: displaySyncScreen = true await syncEngine.cancelOperations() try await syncEngine.sendChanges() try await syncEngine.fetchChanges() displaySyncScreen = false However, I’m unsure if canceling operations like this could lead to data loss or other issues. Is this a safe approach, or would you recommend a better strategy for handling this initial sync state?

Background: Our non-production App was using SwiftData locally. Yesterday we followed the documentation to enable CloudKit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cloudkit/enabling-cloudkit-in-your-app iCloud Works: Data is properly syncing via iCloud between 2 devices. Add on one shows on the other; delete on one deletes on the other. Today we logged into CloudKit Console for the first time; but there are no databases showing. We verified: Users and Roles: we have “Access to Cloud Managed… Certificates” Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles: our app has iCloud capabilities and is using our iCloud Container Signed into CloudKit Console with same developer ID as AppStoreConnect This is also the Apple ID of the iCloud account that has synced data from our app. In Xcode > Signing & Capabilities we are signed in as our Company team. Any guidance or tips to understanding how to what’s going on in CloudKit Console and gaining access to the database is appreciated!

I have two recordTypes in CloudKit: Author and Book. The Book records have their parent property set to an Author, enabling hierarchical record sharing (i.e., if an Author record is shared, the participant can see all books associated with that author in their shared database). When syncing with CKSyncEngine, I was expecting handleFetchedRecordZoneChanges to deliver all Author records before their associated Book records. However, unless I’m missing something, the order appears to be random. This randomness forces me to handle two codepaths in my app (opposed to just one) to replicate CloudKit references in my local persistency storage: Book arrives before its Author → I store the Book but defer setting its parent reference until the corresponding Author arrives. Author arrives before its Books → I can immediately set the parent reference when each Book arrives. Is there a way to ensure that Author records always arrive before Book records when syncing with CKSyncEngine? Or is this behavior inherently unordered and I have to implement two codepaths?

I have an iOS app using SwiftData with VersionedSchema. The schema is synchronized with an CloudKit container. I previously introduced some model properties that I have now removed, as they are no longer needed. This results in the current schema version being identical to one of the previous ones (except for its version number). This results in the following exception: 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: 'Duplicate version checksums across stages detected.' So it looks like we cannot have a newer schema version with an identical content to an older schema version. The intuitive way would be to re-add the old (identical) schema version to the end of the "schemas" list property in the SchemaMigrationPlan, in order to signal that it is the newest one, and to add a migration stage back to it, thus: public enum MySchemaMigrationPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan { public static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [ SchemaV100.self, SchemaV101.self, SchemaV100.self ] } public static var stages: [MigrationStage] { [ migrateV100toV101, migrateV101toV100 ] } However, I am not sure if this is the right way to go, as previously, as I wanted to write unit tests for schema migration and rollback, I tried defining an inverse for each migration stage, so that I could trigger a migration and a rollback from a unit test, which resulted in an exception saying that it is not supported to downgrade a VersionedSchema. I must admit that I solved the original problem by introducing a dummy model property that I will later remove. What would have been the correct approach?

Hi, I am testing a situation with shared CKRecords where the data in the CKRecord syncs fine, but the creatorUserRecordID.recordName and lastModifiedUserRecordID.recordName shows "defaultOwner" (which maps to the CKCurrentUserDefaultName constant) even though I made sure I edit the CKRecord value from a different iCloud account. In fact, on the CloudKit dashboard, it shows the correct user recordIDs in the metadata for the 'Created' and 'Modified' fields, but not in the CKRecord. I am mostly testing this on the iPhone simulator with the debugger attached. Is that a possible reason for this, or is there some other reason the lastModifiedUserRecordID is showing the value for 'CKCurrentUserDefaultName'? It would be pretty difficult to build in functionality to look up changes by a different userID if this is the case.

Hi, I am building an iOS app with SwiftUI and SwiftData for the first time and I am experiencing a lot of difficulty with this error: Thread 44: Fatal error: Never access a full future backing data - PersistentIdentifier(id: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.ID(backing: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.PersistentIdentifierBacking.managedObjectID(<ID> <x-coredata://<UUID>/MySwiftDataModel/p1>)), backing: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.PersistentIdentifierBacking.managedObjectID(<ID> <x-coredata://<UUID>/MySwiftDataModel/p1>)) with Optional(<UUID>) I have been trying to figure out what the problem is, but unfortunately I cannot find any information in the documentation or on other sources online. My only theory about this error is that it is somehow related to fetching an entity that has been created in-memory, but not yet saved to the modelContext in SwiftData. However, when I am trying to debug this, it's not clear this is the case. Sometimes the error happens, sometimes it doesn't. Saving manually does not always solve the error. Therefore, it would be extremely helpful if someone could explain what this error means and whether there are any best practices to do with SwiftData, or some pitfalls to avoid (such as wrapping my model context into a repository class). To be clear, this problem is NOT related to one area of my code, it happens throughout my app, at unpredictable places and time. Given that there is very little information related to this error, I am at a loss at how to make sure that this never happens. This question has been asked on the forum here as well as on StackOverflow, Reddit (can't link that here), but none of the answers worked for me. For reference, my models generally look like this: import Foundation import SwiftData @Model final class MySwiftDataModel { // Stable cross-device identity @Attribute(.unique) var uuid: UUID var someNumber: Int var someString: String @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify, inverse: \AnotherSwiftDataModel.parentModel) var childModels: [AnotherSwiftDataModel] init(uuid: UUID = UUID(), someNumber: Int = 1, someString: String = "Some", childModels: [AnotherSwiftDataModel] = []) { self.uuid = uuid self.someNumber = someNumber self.someString = someString self.childModels = childModels } func addChildModel(model: AnotherSwiftDataModel) { self.childModels.append(model) } func removeChildModel(by id: PersistentIdentifier) { self.childModels = self.childModels.filter { $0.id != id } } } and the child model: import Foundation import SwiftData @Model final class AnotherSwiftDataModel { // Stable cross-device identity @Attribute(.unique) var uuid: UUID var someNumber: Int var someString: String var parentModel: MySwiftDataModel? init(uuid: UUID = UUID(), someNumber: Int = 1, someString: String = "Some") { self.uuid = uuid self.someNumber = someNumber self.someString = someString } } For now, you can assume I am not using CloudKit - i know for a fact the error is unrelated to CloudKit, because it happens when I am not using CloudKit (so I do not need to follow CloudKit's requirements for model design, such as nullable values etc). As I said, the error surfaces at different times - sometimes during assignments, a lot of times during deletions of related models, etc. Could you please explain what I am doing wrong and how I can make sure that this error does not happen? What are the architectural patterns that work best for SwiftData in this case? Do you have any examples of things I should avoid? Thanks

Does the CloudKit participant limit of 100 include the owner?

I am having problems when I first loads the app. The time it takes for the Items to be sync from my CloudKit to my local CoreData is too long. Code I have the model below defined by my CoreData. public extension Item { @nonobjc class func fetchRequest() -> NSFetchRequest<Item> { NSFetchRequest<Item>(entityName: "Item") } @NSManaged var createdAt: Date? @NSManaged var id: UUID? @NSManaged var image: Data? @NSManaged var usdz: Data? @NSManaged var characteristics: NSSet? @NSManaged var parent: SomeParent? } image and usdz columns are both marked as BinaryData and Attribute Allows External Storage is also selected. I made a Few tests loading the data when the app is downloaded for the first time. I am loading on my view using the below code: @FetchRequest( sortDescriptors: [NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Item.createdAt, ascending: true)] ) private var items: FetchedResults<Item> var body: some View { VStack { ScrollView(.vertical, showsIndicators: false) { LazyVGrid(columns: columns, spacing: 40) { ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in Text(item.id) } } } } } Test 1 - Just loads everything When I have on my cloudKit images and usdz a total of 100mb data, it takes around 140 seconds to show some data on my view (Not all items were sync, that takes much longer time) Test 2 - Trying getting only 10 items at the time () This takes the same amount of times the long one . I have added the following in my class, and removed the @FetchRequest: @State private var items: [Item] = [] // CK @State private var isLoading = false @MainActor func loadMoreData() { guard !isLoading else { return } isLoading = true let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest<Item>(entityName: "Item") fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "title != nil AND title != ''") fetchRequest.fetchLimit = 10 fetchRequest.fetchOffset = items.count fetchRequest.predicate = getPredicate() fetchRequest.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Item.createdAt, ascending: true)] do { let newItems = try viewContext.fetch(fetchRequest) DispatchQueue.main.async { items.append(contentsOf: newItems) isLoading = false } } catch {} } Test 2 - Remove all images and usdz from CloudKit set all as Null Setting all items BinaryData to null, it takes around 8 seconds to Show the list. So as we can see here, all the solutions that I found are bad. I just wanna go to my CloudKit and fetch the data with my CoreData. And if possible to NOT fetch all the data because that would be not possible (imagine the future with 10 or 20GB or data) What is the solution for this loading problem? What do I need to do/fix in order to load lets say 10 items first, then later on the other items and let the user have a seamlessly experience? Questions What are the solutions I have when the user first loads the app? How to force CoreData to query directly cloudKit? Does CoreData + CloudKit + NSPersistentCloudKitContainer will download the whole CloudKit database in my local, is that good???? Storing images as BinaryData with Allow external Storage does not seems to be working well, because it is downloading the image even without the need for the image right now, how should I store the Binary data or Images in this case?

In the CloudKit logs I see logs that suggest users getting QUOTA_EXCEEDED error for RecordDelete operations. { "time":"21/07/2025, 7:57:46 UTC" "database":"PRIVATE" "zone":"***" "userId":"***" "operationId":"***" "operationGroupName":"2.3.3(185)" "operationType":"RecordDelete" "platform":"iPhone" "clientOS":"iOS;18.5" "overallStatus":"USER_ERROR" "error":"QUOTA_EXCEEDED" "requestId":"***" "executionTimeMs":"177" "interfaceType":"NATIVE" "recordInsertBytes":54352 "recordInsertCount":40 "returnedRecordTypes":"_pcs_data" } I'm confused as to what this means? Why would a RecordDelete operation have recordInsertBytes? I'd expect a RecordDelete operation to never fail on quotaExceeded and how would I handle that in the app?

Hello, I'm trying to work on an iPadOS and macOS app that will rely on the document-based system to create some kind of orientation task to follow. Let say task1.myfile will be a check point regulation from NYC to SF and task2.myfile will be a visit as many key location as you can in SF. The file represent the specific landmark location and rules of the game. And once open, I will be able to read KML/GPS file to evaluate their score based with the current task. But opened GPS files does not have to be stored in the task file itself, it stay alongside. I wanted to use that scenario to experiment with SwiftData (I'm a long time CoreData user, I even wrote my own WebDAV based persistent store back in the day), and so, mix both on file and in memory persistent store, with distribution based on object class. With CoreData it would have been possible, but I do not see how to achieve that with SwiftData and DocumentGroup integration. Any idea how to do that?

I have been trying to find out the app limits to my app when released into the app store, I understand that in the public database the app worldwide can use 200g of bandwidth free per month. What happens after that? is it throttled? is there a pricing structure for overages? thanks

When creating a new project in Xcode 26, the default for defaultIsolation is MainActor. Core Data creates classes for each entity using code gen, but now those classes are also internally marked as MainActor, which causes issues when accessing managed object from a background thread like this. Is there a way to fix this warning or should Xcode actually mark these auto generated classes as nonisolated to make this better? Filed as FB13840800. nonisolated struct BackgroundDataHandler { @concurrent func saveItem() async throws { let context = await PersistenceController.shared.container.newBackgroundContext() try await context.perform { let newGame = Item(context: context) newGame.timestamp = Date.now // Main actor-isolated property 'timestamp' can not be mutated from a nonisolated context; this is an error in the Swift 6 language mode try context.save() } } } Turning code gen off inside the model and creating it manually, with the nonisolated keyword, gets rid of the warning and still works fine. So I guess the auto generated class could adopt this as well? public import Foundation public import CoreData public typealias ItemCoreDataClassSet = NSSet @objc(Item) nonisolated public class Item: NSManagedObject { }

I’m seeing persistent issues with iCloud Drive hydration and Finder sync on a new M4 MacBook Pro running Sequoia 15.5 (24F74). The same folders hydrate correctly on other Macs (Intel and M1), but not on the M4. ✅ Tried: – killall bird – Safe Mode boot – Toggling iCloud Drive and System Settings > Apple ID – Isolating network, user profile, and running First Aid 🔍 Findings: – EtreCheck report shows consistent high CPU usage from bird with no resolution. – Console logs suggest bird is waiting on local metadata index. – No VPNs installed. No third-party sync tools active. I’ve sanitized and attached the EtreCheck report as text for reference (or can paste if needed). ❓ Questions: 1. Is this a known issue on M4 systems or Sequoia 15.5? 2. Could file system ownership have been impacted by command-line tools? 3. Is there a safe method to reset bird metadata or iCloud sync state locally? Any guidance from Apple or other developers would be appreciated. Thanks!